FMO、QM/MM、MM- pb /SA和MP-CAFEE方法对FKBP配体结合亲和力评价的比较

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Chem-Bio Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.1273/CBIJ.10.32
博文 渡邉, 成典 田中, 憲明 沖本, 亜樹 長谷川, 泰地 真弘人, 義明 谷田, 崇志 三井, 勝山 マリコ, 秀章 藤谷
{"title":"FMO、QM/MM、MM- pb /SA和MP-CAFEE方法对FKBP配体结合亲和力评价的比较","authors":"博文 渡邉, 成典 田中, 憲明 沖本, 亜樹 長谷川, 泰地 真弘人, 義明 谷田, 崇志 三井, 勝山 マリコ, 秀章 藤谷","doi":"10.1273/CBIJ.10.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared binding affinity evaluations for 10 FKBP ligands with such state-of-the-art computational methods as FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA, and MP-CAFEE. For the FKBP ligands, we confirmed that each method could provide good correlations between the experimental and computational binding affinities. From the calculated results, we discussed the importance of solvation effect and structural sampling for these methods in detail. In addition, we argued the issue of computational time and present arguments on the future perspective of the computational binding affinity evaluations.","PeriodicalId":40659,"journal":{"name":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of binding affinity evaluations for FKBP ligands with state-of-the-art computational methods: FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA and MP-CAFEE approaches\",\"authors\":\"博文 渡邉, 成典 田中, 憲明 沖本, 亜樹 長谷川, 泰地 真弘人, 義明 谷田, 崇志 三井, 勝山 マリコ, 秀章 藤谷\",\"doi\":\"10.1273/CBIJ.10.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compared binding affinity evaluations for 10 FKBP ligands with such state-of-the-art computational methods as FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA, and MP-CAFEE. For the FKBP ligands, we confirmed that each method could provide good correlations between the experimental and computational binding affinities. From the calculated results, we discussed the importance of solvation effect and structural sampling for these methods in detail. In addition, we argued the issue of computational time and present arguments on the future perspective of the computational binding affinity evaluations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1273/CBIJ.10.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1273/CBIJ.10.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们比较了FMO、QM/MM、MM- pb /SA和MP-CAFEE等最先进的计算方法对10种FKBP配体的结合亲和力评价。对于FKBP配体,我们证实了每种方法都可以在实验和计算的结合亲和力之间提供良好的相关性。从计算结果出发,详细讨论了溶剂化效应和结构取样对这些方法的重要性。此外,我们还讨论了计算时间的问题,并就计算绑定亲和力评估的未来前景提出了论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of binding affinity evaluations for FKBP ligands with state-of-the-art computational methods: FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA and MP-CAFEE approaches
We compared binding affinity evaluations for 10 FKBP ligands with such state-of-the-art computational methods as FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA, and MP-CAFEE. For the FKBP ligands, we confirmed that each method could provide good correlations between the experimental and computational binding affinities. From the calculated results, we discussed the importance of solvation effect and structural sampling for these methods in detail. In addition, we argued the issue of computational time and present arguments on the future perspective of the computational binding affinity evaluations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Structural Stability and Binding Ability of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease with GC376: A Stereoisomeric Covalent Ligand Analysis by FMO calculation Enzyme Kinetics Based on the Concept of Flux Enzyme Kinetics Based on the Concept of Flux Application of Model Core Potentials to Zn- and Mg-containing Metalloproteins in the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method How Beneficial or Threatening is Artificial Intelligence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1