直接口服抗凝剂、华法林和抗血小板药物对器械袋血肿风险的影响:擦伤控制1和2的综合分析。

V. Essebag, J. Healey, J. Joza, P. Nery, E. Kalfon, T. Leiria, A. Verma, F. Ayala-Paredes, B. Coutu, G. Sumner, G. Becker, F. Philippon, J. Eikelboom, R. Sandhu, John Sapp, R. Leather, D. Yung, B. Thibault, C. Simpson, K. Ahmad, Satish C. Toal, M. Sturmer, K. Kavanagh, E. Crystal, G. Wells, A. Krahn, D. Birnie
{"title":"直接口服抗凝剂、华法林和抗血小板药物对器械袋血肿风险的影响:擦伤控制1和2的综合分析。","authors":"V. Essebag, J. Healey, J. Joza, P. Nery, E. Kalfon, T. Leiria, A. Verma, F. Ayala-Paredes, B. Coutu, G. Sumner, G. Becker, F. Philippon, J. Eikelboom, R. Sandhu, John Sapp, R. Leather, D. Yung, B. Thibault, C. Simpson, K. Ahmad, Satish C. Toal, M. Sturmer, K. Kavanagh, E. Crystal, G. Wells, A. Krahn, D. Birnie","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nOral anticoagulant use is common among patients undergoing pacemaker or defibrillator surgery. BRUISE CONTROL (Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT00800137) demonstrated that perioperative warfarin continuation reduced clinically significant hematomas (CSH) by 80% compared with heparin bridging (3.5% versus 16%). BRUISE-CONTROL-2 (NCT01675076) observed a similarly low risk of CSH when comparing continued versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulant (2.1% in both groups). Using patient level data from both trials, the current study aims to: (1) evaluate the effect of concomitant antiplatelet therapy on CSH, and (2) understand the relative risk of CSH in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe analyzed 1343 patients included in BRUISE-CONTROL-1 and BRUISE-CONTROL-2. The primary outcome for both trials was CSH. There were 408 patients identified as having continued either a single or dual antiplatelet agent at the time of device surgery.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAntiplatelet use (versus nonuse) was associated with CSH in 9.8% versus 4.3% of patients (P<0.001), and remained a strong independent predictor after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio, 1.965; 95% CI, 1.202-3.213; P=0.0071). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for antiplatelet use, there was no significant difference in CSH observed between direct oral anticoagulant use compared with continued warfarin (odds ratio, 0.858; 95% CI, 0.375-1.963; P=0.717).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nConcomitant antiplatelet therapy doubled the risk of CSH during device surgery. No difference in CSH was found between direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin. In anticoagulated patients undergoing elective or semi-urgent device surgery, the patient specific benefit/risk of holding an antiplatelet should be carefully considered.\n\n\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\nURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00800137, NCT01675076.","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants, Warfarin, and Antiplatelet Agents on Risk of Device Pocket Hematoma: Combined Analysis of BRUISE CONTROL 1 and 2.\",\"authors\":\"V. Essebag, J. Healey, J. Joza, P. Nery, E. Kalfon, T. Leiria, A. Verma, F. Ayala-Paredes, B. Coutu, G. Sumner, G. Becker, F. Philippon, J. Eikelboom, R. Sandhu, John Sapp, R. Leather, D. Yung, B. Thibault, C. Simpson, K. Ahmad, Satish C. Toal, M. Sturmer, K. Kavanagh, E. Crystal, G. Wells, A. Krahn, D. Birnie\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nOral anticoagulant use is common among patients undergoing pacemaker or defibrillator surgery. BRUISE CONTROL (Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT00800137) demonstrated that perioperative warfarin continuation reduced clinically significant hematomas (CSH) by 80% compared with heparin bridging (3.5% versus 16%). BRUISE-CONTROL-2 (NCT01675076) observed a similarly low risk of CSH when comparing continued versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulant (2.1% in both groups). Using patient level data from both trials, the current study aims to: (1) evaluate the effect of concomitant antiplatelet therapy on CSH, and (2) understand the relative risk of CSH in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe analyzed 1343 patients included in BRUISE-CONTROL-1 and BRUISE-CONTROL-2. The primary outcome for both trials was CSH. There were 408 patients identified as having continued either a single or dual antiplatelet agent at the time of device surgery.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAntiplatelet use (versus nonuse) was associated with CSH in 9.8% versus 4.3% of patients (P<0.001), and remained a strong independent predictor after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio, 1.965; 95% CI, 1.202-3.213; P=0.0071). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for antiplatelet use, there was no significant difference in CSH observed between direct oral anticoagulant use compared with continued warfarin (odds ratio, 0.858; 95% CI, 0.375-1.963; P=0.717).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nConcomitant antiplatelet therapy doubled the risk of CSH during device surgery. No difference in CSH was found between direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin. In anticoagulated patients undergoing elective or semi-urgent device surgery, the patient specific benefit/risk of holding an antiplatelet should be carefully considered.\\n\\n\\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\\nURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00800137, NCT01675076.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

背景:在接受起搏器或除颤器手术的患者中,经口使用抗凝剂是很常见的。器械手术中擦伤控制(桥接或持续香豆素)的随机对照试验NCT00800137)表明,与肝素桥接相比,围手术期继续华法林可减少80%的临床显著血肿(CSH)(3.5%对16%)。bruice - control -2 (NCT01675076)在比较持续和中断直接口服抗凝剂时观察到类似的低CSH风险(两组均为2.1%)。利用两项试验的患者水平数据,本研究旨在:(1)评估联合抗血小板治疗对CSH的影响,(2)了解直接口服抗凝剂与持续华法林治疗的患者CSH的相对风险。方法对1343例合并挫伤-1和挫伤-2的患者进行分析。两项试验的主要结局均为CSH。有408名患者在器械手术时继续使用单一或双重抗血小板药物。结果抗血小板使用(与不使用)与CSH相关的患者比例分别为9.8%和4.3% (P<0.001),并且在多变量调整后仍然是一个强大的独立预测因子(优势比,1.965;95% ci, 1.202-3.213;P = 0.0071)。在多变量分析中,调整抗血小板使用,直接口服抗凝剂与持续使用华法林相比,CSH无显著差异(优势比,0.858;95% ci, 0.375-1.963;P = 0.717)。结论在器械手术中同时使用抗血小板治疗可使CSH发生的风险增加一倍。直接口服抗凝剂与持续使用华法林之间CSH无差异。在接受选择性或半紧急装置手术的抗凝患者中,应仔细考虑患者持有抗血小板药物的具体获益/风险。临床试验注册网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00800137, NCT01675076。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants, Warfarin, and Antiplatelet Agents on Risk of Device Pocket Hematoma: Combined Analysis of BRUISE CONTROL 1 and 2.
BACKGROUND Oral anticoagulant use is common among patients undergoing pacemaker or defibrillator surgery. BRUISE CONTROL (Bridge or Continue Coumadin for Device Surgery Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT00800137) demonstrated that perioperative warfarin continuation reduced clinically significant hematomas (CSH) by 80% compared with heparin bridging (3.5% versus 16%). BRUISE-CONTROL-2 (NCT01675076) observed a similarly low risk of CSH when comparing continued versus interrupted direct oral anticoagulant (2.1% in both groups). Using patient level data from both trials, the current study aims to: (1) evaluate the effect of concomitant antiplatelet therapy on CSH, and (2) understand the relative risk of CSH in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin. METHODS We analyzed 1343 patients included in BRUISE-CONTROL-1 and BRUISE-CONTROL-2. The primary outcome for both trials was CSH. There were 408 patients identified as having continued either a single or dual antiplatelet agent at the time of device surgery. RESULTS Antiplatelet use (versus nonuse) was associated with CSH in 9.8% versus 4.3% of patients (P<0.001), and remained a strong independent predictor after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio, 1.965; 95% CI, 1.202-3.213; P=0.0071). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for antiplatelet use, there was no significant difference in CSH observed between direct oral anticoagulant use compared with continued warfarin (odds ratio, 0.858; 95% CI, 0.375-1.963; P=0.717). CONCLUSIONS Concomitant antiplatelet therapy doubled the risk of CSH during device surgery. No difference in CSH was found between direct oral anticoagulant versus continued warfarin. In anticoagulated patients undergoing elective or semi-urgent device surgery, the patient specific benefit/risk of holding an antiplatelet should be carefully considered. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00800137, NCT01675076.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronary Sinus Metabolite 12,13-diHOME Is a Novel Biomarker for Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter Characteristics of Right-Sided Accessory Pathways Associated With Right Cardiac Veins Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1