{"title":"不同奇异点提取技术的比较研究","authors":"Chunbei Luo, Yong Zhang, Hai Lin","doi":"10.1109/COMPEM.2015.7052665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) is presented Three types of methods which are the Duffy transform, projection integration and the analytic integration are implemented and compared Numerical results show the differences in the efficiency, memory usage and the accuracy of three methods. Furthermore, the best choice of the different methods is recommended for dealing with singularity when mesh sizes are different.","PeriodicalId":6530,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics","volume":"37 1","pages":"369-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of EFIE\",\"authors\":\"Chunbei Luo, Yong Zhang, Hai Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPEM.2015.7052665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) is presented Three types of methods which are the Duffy transform, projection integration and the analytic integration are implemented and compared Numerical results show the differences in the efficiency, memory usage and the accuracy of three methods. Furthermore, the best choice of the different methods is recommended for dealing with singularity when mesh sizes are different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"369-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPEM.2015.7052665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPEM.2015.7052665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of EFIE
A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) is presented Three types of methods which are the Duffy transform, projection integration and the analytic integration are implemented and compared Numerical results show the differences in the efficiency, memory usage and the accuracy of three methods. Furthermore, the best choice of the different methods is recommended for dealing with singularity when mesh sizes are different.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
