第一篇:学校:基于学生的在线、按需专业发展对教育者的影响

S. Shaha, Kelly F. Glassett, Aimee Copas, Heather Ellsworth
{"title":"第一篇:学校:基于学生的在线、按需专业发展对教育者的影响","authors":"S. Shaha, Kelly F. Glassett, Aimee Copas, Heather Ellsworth","doi":"10.19030/CIER.V8I4.9430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Title I students remain among the most challenging population for achieving significant gains in academic performance and standardized test scores. This multi-state, quasi-experimental, pre-versus-post study reflects the comparative Title I gains for math and reading scores for teachers participating in an online, on-demand professional development program school-wide versus non-participating Title I in their respective districts as benchmarks. Average Title I gains in reading were 4.8% (p<.001) versus 0.1% (ns) in the non-participating Title I schools. For math scores, non-participating Title I schools in the districts saw a decline of 5.9% (p<.001), while Title I schools participating in the professional development experienced a gain of 7.3% (p<.001). Conclusions are that significant advantages for Title I students are achieved when teachers participate actively in such a high impact, high accessibility professional development program.","PeriodicalId":91062,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","volume":"4 1 1","pages":"227-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Title I Schools: The Student-Based Impact Of Online, On-Demand Professional Development On Educators\",\"authors\":\"S. Shaha, Kelly F. Glassett, Aimee Copas, Heather Ellsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.19030/CIER.V8I4.9430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Title I students remain among the most challenging population for achieving significant gains in academic performance and standardized test scores. This multi-state, quasi-experimental, pre-versus-post study reflects the comparative Title I gains for math and reading scores for teachers participating in an online, on-demand professional development program school-wide versus non-participating Title I in their respective districts as benchmarks. Average Title I gains in reading were 4.8% (p<.001) versus 0.1% (ns) in the non-participating Title I schools. For math scores, non-participating Title I schools in the districts saw a decline of 5.9% (p<.001), while Title I schools participating in the professional development experienced a gain of 7.3% (p<.001). Conclusions are that significant advantages for Title I students are achieved when teachers participate actively in such a high impact, high accessibility professional development program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)\",\"volume\":\"4 1 1\",\"pages\":\"227-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19030/CIER.V8I4.9430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/CIER.V8I4.9430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在学业成绩和标准化考试成绩方面,第一标题学生仍然是最具挑战性的群体。这项多州、准实验、前后对比的研究反映了教师在数学和阅读成绩方面的比较,这些教师参加了全校范围内的在线、按需专业发展计划,而在各自的学区,没有参加第一职称的教师作为基准。在阅读方面,一级学校的平均收益为4.8% (p< 0.001),而非一级学校的平均收益为0.1% (ns)。在数学成绩方面,该地区未参与的一级学校下降了5.9% (p< 0.001),而参与专业发展的一级学校则上升了7.3% (p< 0.001)。结论是,当教师积极参与这种高影响、高可及性的专业发展计划时,第一职称学生获得了显著的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Title I Schools: The Student-Based Impact Of Online, On-Demand Professional Development On Educators
Title I students remain among the most challenging population for achieving significant gains in academic performance and standardized test scores. This multi-state, quasi-experimental, pre-versus-post study reflects the comparative Title I gains for math and reading scores for teachers participating in an online, on-demand professional development program school-wide versus non-participating Title I in their respective districts as benchmarks. Average Title I gains in reading were 4.8% (p<.001) versus 0.1% (ns) in the non-participating Title I schools. For math scores, non-participating Title I schools in the districts saw a decline of 5.9% (p<.001), while Title I schools participating in the professional development experienced a gain of 7.3% (p<.001). Conclusions are that significant advantages for Title I students are achieved when teachers participate actively in such a high impact, high accessibility professional development program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fluency Strategies For Beginning Readers Dramatic Play In Relation To Self- Regulation In Preschool Age Exploring The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence And Academic Stress Among Students At A Small, Private College A Marketing Course And The Liberal Arts: Students’ Perspective Of Interdisciplinary Relevance Improving Engagement In A Lecture Course By Increasing Relevance To Student Needs And Interests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1