移民和澳大利亚学校教育的隐藏历史

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Education Review Pub Date : 2019-09-26 DOI:10.1108/her-08-2019-0032
H. Proctor
{"title":"移民和澳大利亚学校教育的隐藏历史","authors":"H. Proctor","doi":"10.1108/her-08-2019-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDespite Australia’s history as an exemplary migrant nation, there are gaps in the literature and a lack of explicit conceptualisation of either “migrants” or “migration” in the Australian historiography of schooling. The purpose of this paper is to seek out traces of migration history that nevertheless exist in the historiography, despite the apparent silences.Design/methodology/approachTwo foundational yet semi-forgotten twentieth-century historical monographs are re-interpreted to support a rethinking of the relationship between migration and settler colonialism in the history and historiography of Australian schooling.FindingsThese texts, from their different school system (state/Catholic) orientations, are, it is argued, replete with accounts of migration despite their apparent gaps, if read closely. Within them, nineteenth-century British migrants are represented as essentially entitled constituents of the protonation. This is a very different framing from twentieth century histories of migrants as minority or “other”.Originality/valueInstead of an academic reading practice that dismisses and simply supersedes old work, this paper proposes that fresh engagements with texts from the past can yield new insights into the connections between migration, schooling and colonialism. It argues that the historiography of Australian schooling should not simply be expanded to include or encompass the stories of “migrants” within a “minority studies” framework, although there is plenty of useful work yet to be accomplished in that area, but should be re-examined as having been about migration all along.","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hidden historiography of migration and Australian schooling\",\"authors\":\"H. Proctor\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/her-08-2019-0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeDespite Australia’s history as an exemplary migrant nation, there are gaps in the literature and a lack of explicit conceptualisation of either “migrants” or “migration” in the Australian historiography of schooling. The purpose of this paper is to seek out traces of migration history that nevertheless exist in the historiography, despite the apparent silences.Design/methodology/approachTwo foundational yet semi-forgotten twentieth-century historical monographs are re-interpreted to support a rethinking of the relationship between migration and settler colonialism in the history and historiography of Australian schooling.FindingsThese texts, from their different school system (state/Catholic) orientations, are, it is argued, replete with accounts of migration despite their apparent gaps, if read closely. Within them, nineteenth-century British migrants are represented as essentially entitled constituents of the protonation. This is a very different framing from twentieth century histories of migrants as minority or “other”.Originality/valueInstead of an academic reading practice that dismisses and simply supersedes old work, this paper proposes that fresh engagements with texts from the past can yield new insights into the connections between migration, schooling and colonialism. It argues that the historiography of Australian schooling should not simply be expanded to include or encompass the stories of “migrants” within a “minority studies” framework, although there is plenty of useful work yet to be accomplished in that area, but should be re-examined as having been about migration all along.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-08-2019-0032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-08-2019-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管澳大利亚历史上是一个模范的移民国家,但在澳大利亚的教育史学中,文献中存在空白,缺乏“移民”或“移民”的明确概念。本文的目的是寻找在历史编纂中仍然存在的移民历史的痕迹,尽管表面上是沉默的。设计/方法/方法重新解读了两本基础性但又半被遗忘的20世纪历史专著,以支持对澳大利亚教育历史和史学中移民和定居者殖民主义之间关系的重新思考。这些文本来自不同的学校系统(国家/天主教)取向,有人认为,尽管它们之间存在明显的差距,但如果仔细阅读,它们充满了对移民的描述。在其中,19世纪的英国移民被认为是质子化的重要组成部分。这与20世纪将移民视为少数民族或“其他”的历史截然不同。原创性/价值本文提出,与过去的文本进行新的接触,可以对移民、学校教育和殖民主义之间的联系产生新的见解,而不是摒弃和简单地取代旧作品的学术阅读实践。它认为,澳大利亚学校教育的史学不应该简单地扩展到包括或包含“少数民族研究”框架内的“移民”故事,尽管在该领域还有很多有用的工作有待完成,但应该重新审视,因为一直以来都是关于移民的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The hidden historiography of migration and Australian schooling
PurposeDespite Australia’s history as an exemplary migrant nation, there are gaps in the literature and a lack of explicit conceptualisation of either “migrants” or “migration” in the Australian historiography of schooling. The purpose of this paper is to seek out traces of migration history that nevertheless exist in the historiography, despite the apparent silences.Design/methodology/approachTwo foundational yet semi-forgotten twentieth-century historical monographs are re-interpreted to support a rethinking of the relationship between migration and settler colonialism in the history and historiography of Australian schooling.FindingsThese texts, from their different school system (state/Catholic) orientations, are, it is argued, replete with accounts of migration despite their apparent gaps, if read closely. Within them, nineteenth-century British migrants are represented as essentially entitled constituents of the protonation. This is a very different framing from twentieth century histories of migrants as minority or “other”.Originality/valueInstead of an academic reading practice that dismisses and simply supersedes old work, this paper proposes that fresh engagements with texts from the past can yield new insights into the connections between migration, schooling and colonialism. It argues that the historiography of Australian schooling should not simply be expanded to include or encompass the stories of “migrants” within a “minority studies” framework, although there is plenty of useful work yet to be accomplished in that area, but should be re-examined as having been about migration all along.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The demise of school-developed elective courses in NSW: a case study in centralisation “A pleasant walk on the Pakihi”: ecological orientations in mid-century nature study Enchanting things: the scientific communication of Julius Sumner Miller The Endeavour scholarships program in the era of the Asian century: promise unfulfilled Changing policy, changing plans: responses to the end of fee-free education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1