{"title":"咨询和心理治疗的多样性","authors":"G. Proctor","doi":"10.1080/13642537.2022.2156157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper is a commentary on the articles in this special issue on diversity and inclusion. The concepts of diversity and inclusion are critiqued, and a critical diversity approach is promoted. The difficulties and strengths for the profession of counselling and psychotherapy adopting this approach are explored. Ableism is raised as an issue with a plea for ongoing deconstruction of language and attention to inequalities both within and without the profession.","PeriodicalId":44564,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","volume":"43 1","pages":"198 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity in counselling & psychotherapy\",\"authors\":\"G. Proctor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13642537.2022.2156157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper is a commentary on the articles in this special issue on diversity and inclusion. The concepts of diversity and inclusion are critiqued, and a critical diversity approach is promoted. The difficulties and strengths for the profession of counselling and psychotherapy adopting this approach are explored. Ableism is raised as an issue with a plea for ongoing deconstruction of language and attention to inequalities both within and without the profession.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"198 - 209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2156157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2156157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT This paper is a commentary on the articles in this special issue on diversity and inclusion. The concepts of diversity and inclusion are critiqued, and a critical diversity approach is promoted. The difficulties and strengths for the profession of counselling and psychotherapy adopting this approach are explored. Ableism is raised as an issue with a plea for ongoing deconstruction of language and attention to inequalities both within and without the profession.