加拿大通信服务的准确价格比较和选定的外国司法管辖区

Christian M. Dippon
{"title":"加拿大通信服务的准确价格比较和选定的外国司法管辖区","authors":"Christian M. Dippon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3309214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2008, Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED) and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) have retained Wall Communications Inc. (Wall) or NGL Nordicity Group Ltd. (Nordicity) to conduct a price comparison of communication services in Canada and select foreign jurisdictions (“the Study”). Wall and Nordicity use nearly identical study methodologies, and every year both consultancies claim that Canadian prices are among the highest in the industrialized world. The purpose of the present report is first to examine the accuracy, or lack thereof, of the Wall/Nordicity Study and second to conduct an economically sound price comparison for the same countries.<br><br>This report reaches two overarching conclusions: (1) The Study’s finding of high prices in Canada relative to other countries is false because it is the result of a poorly designed study and incorrect data interpretation; and (2) a properly designed and executed study methodology reveals that the existing prices for communications services in Canada are cheaper than the prices that foreign providers would charge in Canada for the same service plans.<br><br>The Wall/Nordicity Study compares the prices of communications services in Canada and other countries that are closest to artificial demand profiles established by the consultancy performing the Study, not actual service plans. This approach results in an apples-to-oranges comparison because none of the plans the Study compares are identical. Often the plans being compared are fundamentally different in terms of the services they offer (e.g., number of voice minutes included, data allowance, roaming), network quality (e.g., upload and download speeds), and the geography in which the services are provisioned (e.g., a network in Japan has a different cost structure than a network in Canada). The comparisons in the Study prove nothing about price levels in Canada because they only reflect how close or far certain providers’ plans are relative to the artificial demand profiles established by the consultancy performing the Study. <br><br>Correcting for the significant shortcomings of the Wall/Nordicity Study, this report introduces a proper price comparison of communications services in Canada and ISED’s select foreign jurisdictions. This analysis reveals that: (1) Canadian providers do not charge high prices relative to the benchmark countries; and (2) approximately 80% of the Canadian mobile wireless telephony, mobile broadband Internet, and fixed broadband Internet plans studied have prices below international benchmarks, which means that Canadian consumers are paying relatively lower prices given the specific market offerings, networks, and country conditions.<br><br>","PeriodicalId":11837,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Accurate Price Comparison of Communications Services in Canada and Select Foreign Jurisdictions\",\"authors\":\"Christian M. Dippon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3309214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2008, Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED) and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) have retained Wall Communications Inc. (Wall) or NGL Nordicity Group Ltd. (Nordicity) to conduct a price comparison of communication services in Canada and select foreign jurisdictions (“the Study”). Wall and Nordicity use nearly identical study methodologies, and every year both consultancies claim that Canadian prices are among the highest in the industrialized world. The purpose of the present report is first to examine the accuracy, or lack thereof, of the Wall/Nordicity Study and second to conduct an economically sound price comparison for the same countries.<br><br>This report reaches two overarching conclusions: (1) The Study’s finding of high prices in Canada relative to other countries is false because it is the result of a poorly designed study and incorrect data interpretation; and (2) a properly designed and executed study methodology reveals that the existing prices for communications services in Canada are cheaper than the prices that foreign providers would charge in Canada for the same service plans.<br><br>The Wall/Nordicity Study compares the prices of communications services in Canada and other countries that are closest to artificial demand profiles established by the consultancy performing the Study, not actual service plans. This approach results in an apples-to-oranges comparison because none of the plans the Study compares are identical. Often the plans being compared are fundamentally different in terms of the services they offer (e.g., number of voice minutes included, data allowance, roaming), network quality (e.g., upload and download speeds), and the geography in which the services are provisioned (e.g., a network in Japan has a different cost structure than a network in Canada). The comparisons in the Study prove nothing about price levels in Canada because they only reflect how close or far certain providers’ plans are relative to the artificial demand profiles established by the consultancy performing the Study. <br><br>Correcting for the significant shortcomings of the Wall/Nordicity Study, this report introduces a proper price comparison of communications services in Canada and ISED’s select foreign jurisdictions. This analysis reveals that: (1) Canadian providers do not charge high prices relative to the benchmark countries; and (2) approximately 80% of the Canadian mobile wireless telephony, mobile broadband Internet, and fixed broadband Internet plans studied have prices below international benchmarks, which means that Canadian consumers are paying relatively lower prices given the specific market offerings, networks, and country conditions.<br><br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3309214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3309214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2008年起,创新、科学及经济发展局(ISED)及加拿大广播电视及电讯委员会(CRTC)委任Wall Communications Inc. (Wall)或NGL Nordicity Group Ltd. (Nordicity)对加拿大及部分外国司法管辖区的通讯服务进行价格比较(“研究”)。Wall和Nordicity使用几乎相同的研究方法,每年这两家咨询公司都声称加拿大的物价是工业化国家中最高的。本报告的目的首先是审查Wall/ nordic研究报告是否准确,其次是对同一国家进行经济上合理的价格比较。该报告得出了两个主要结论:(1)该研究关于加拿大相对于其他国家的高价格的发现是错误的,因为这是设计不良的研究和错误的数据解释的结果;(2)适当设计和执行的研究方法表明,加拿大现有的通信服务价格比外国供应商在加拿大为相同的服务计划收取的价格便宜。Wall/Nordicity研究比较了加拿大和其他国家的通信服务价格,这些国家最接近进行研究的咨询公司所建立的人工需求概况,而不是实际的服务计划。这种方法的结果是苹果和橙子的比较,因为研究所比较的计划都不相同。通常被比较的计划在它们提供的服务(例如,包含的语音分钟数,数据津贴,漫游),网络质量(例如,上传和下载速度)以及提供服务的地理位置(例如,日本的网络与加拿大的网络具有不同的成本结构)方面存在根本差异。研究中的比较并不能证明加拿大的价格水平,因为它们只反映了某些供应商的计划相对于执行研究的咨询公司所建立的人为需求概况有多接近或远。为了纠正Wall/ nordic研究的重大缺陷,本报告对加拿大和ise选定的外国司法管辖区的通信服务进行了适当的价格比较。这一分析表明:(1)相对于基准国家,加拿大供应商收取的价格并不高;(2)大约80%的加拿大移动无线电话、移动宽带互联网和固定宽带互联网计划的价格低于国际基准,这意味着考虑到特定的市场产品、网络和国家条件,加拿大消费者支付的价格相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Accurate Price Comparison of Communications Services in Canada and Select Foreign Jurisdictions
Since 2008, Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED) and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) have retained Wall Communications Inc. (Wall) or NGL Nordicity Group Ltd. (Nordicity) to conduct a price comparison of communication services in Canada and select foreign jurisdictions (“the Study”). Wall and Nordicity use nearly identical study methodologies, and every year both consultancies claim that Canadian prices are among the highest in the industrialized world. The purpose of the present report is first to examine the accuracy, or lack thereof, of the Wall/Nordicity Study and second to conduct an economically sound price comparison for the same countries.

This report reaches two overarching conclusions: (1) The Study’s finding of high prices in Canada relative to other countries is false because it is the result of a poorly designed study and incorrect data interpretation; and (2) a properly designed and executed study methodology reveals that the existing prices for communications services in Canada are cheaper than the prices that foreign providers would charge in Canada for the same service plans.

The Wall/Nordicity Study compares the prices of communications services in Canada and other countries that are closest to artificial demand profiles established by the consultancy performing the Study, not actual service plans. This approach results in an apples-to-oranges comparison because none of the plans the Study compares are identical. Often the plans being compared are fundamentally different in terms of the services they offer (e.g., number of voice minutes included, data allowance, roaming), network quality (e.g., upload and download speeds), and the geography in which the services are provisioned (e.g., a network in Japan has a different cost structure than a network in Canada). The comparisons in the Study prove nothing about price levels in Canada because they only reflect how close or far certain providers’ plans are relative to the artificial demand profiles established by the consultancy performing the Study.

Correcting for the significant shortcomings of the Wall/Nordicity Study, this report introduces a proper price comparison of communications services in Canada and ISED’s select foreign jurisdictions. This analysis reveals that: (1) Canadian providers do not charge high prices relative to the benchmark countries; and (2) approximately 80% of the Canadian mobile wireless telephony, mobile broadband Internet, and fixed broadband Internet plans studied have prices below international benchmarks, which means that Canadian consumers are paying relatively lower prices given the specific market offerings, networks, and country conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling Preference Heterogeneity Within and Across Behavioral Types: Evidence from a Real-world Betting Market The economics of movies (revisited): A decade of literature in review Does Industry Classification Matter in IT Business Value Research? A Simple Method to Estimate Discrete-type Random Coefficients Logit Models Intermittent versus Dispatchable Power Sources: An Integrated Competitive Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1