管理控制系统对启动资金的重要性——来自外部融资者的经验证据

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI:10.1108/JAOC-07-2020-0089
Hanna Schachel, M. Lachmann, Christoph Endenich, Oliver Breucker
{"title":"管理控制系统对启动资金的重要性——来自外部融资者的经验证据","authors":"Hanna Schachel, M. Lachmann, Christoph Endenich, Oliver Breucker","doi":"10.1108/JAOC-07-2020-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine which categories of management control systems (MCSs) in startups are most important to external financiers. Furthermore, this paper investigates how equity and debt financiers differ in their perceptions of MCS categories and examines the relevance of MCSs for their investment decisions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study collects data through a cross-sectional survey sent to equity and debt financiers actively investing in startups. The results are based on survey responses from 73 financiers.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that financial MCSs are considered most important, followed by strategic MCSs, while human resources MCSs are perceived as only moderately important. This paper finds significant differences in the perceived importance of MCS categories between equity and debt providers, which can be explained by differing risk profiles and monitoring needs. Although debt financiers consider financial and strategic MCSs to be less important for their portfolios’ startups than equity financiers do, debt financiers perceive MCSs as more important for their initial investment decisions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study sheds new light on the importance of different MCS categories in startups by analyzing external financiers’ perceptions. Overall, the empirical study provides insights that are particularly valuable for startups seeking external financing for company growth.\n","PeriodicalId":46141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of management control systems for startup funding – empirical evidence from external financiers\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Schachel, M. Lachmann, Christoph Endenich, Oliver Breucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JAOC-07-2020-0089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to examine which categories of management control systems (MCSs) in startups are most important to external financiers. Furthermore, this paper investigates how equity and debt financiers differ in their perceptions of MCS categories and examines the relevance of MCSs for their investment decisions.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study collects data through a cross-sectional survey sent to equity and debt financiers actively investing in startups. The results are based on survey responses from 73 financiers.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results show that financial MCSs are considered most important, followed by strategic MCSs, while human resources MCSs are perceived as only moderately important. This paper finds significant differences in the perceived importance of MCS categories between equity and debt providers, which can be explained by differing risk profiles and monitoring needs. Although debt financiers consider financial and strategic MCSs to be less important for their portfolios’ startups than equity financiers do, debt financiers perceive MCSs as more important for their initial investment decisions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe study sheds new light on the importance of different MCS categories in startups by analyzing external financiers’ perceptions. Overall, the empirical study provides insights that are particularly valuable for startups seeking external financing for company growth.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-07-2020-0089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-07-2020-0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在探讨创业公司中哪些类别的管理控制系统(mcs)对外部融资者最为重要。此外,本文还研究了股权和债务金融家对MCS类别的看法如何不同,并研究了MCS对其投资决策的相关性。设计/方法/方法本研究通过向积极投资初创公司的股权和债务金融家发送横断面调查来收集数据。这一结果是基于对73名金融家的调查。研究结果表明,财务管理责任被认为是最重要的,其次是战略管理责任,而人力资源管理责任被认为只是中等重要。本文发现,股权和债务提供者对MCS类别的感知重要性存在显著差异,这可以通过不同的风险概况和监测需求来解释。尽管债务融资者认为财务和战略mcs对其投资组合中的初创企业的重要性不如股权融资者,但债务融资者认为mcs对其初始投资决策更为重要。该研究通过分析外部投资者的看法,揭示了不同MCS类别在初创企业中的重要性。总体而言,该实证研究为寻求外部融资以促进公司增长的初创公司提供了特别有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The importance of management control systems for startup funding – empirical evidence from external financiers
Purpose This study aims to examine which categories of management control systems (MCSs) in startups are most important to external financiers. Furthermore, this paper investigates how equity and debt financiers differ in their perceptions of MCS categories and examines the relevance of MCSs for their investment decisions. Design/methodology/approach This study collects data through a cross-sectional survey sent to equity and debt financiers actively investing in startups. The results are based on survey responses from 73 financiers. Findings The results show that financial MCSs are considered most important, followed by strategic MCSs, while human resources MCSs are perceived as only moderately important. This paper finds significant differences in the perceived importance of MCS categories between equity and debt providers, which can be explained by differing risk profiles and monitoring needs. Although debt financiers consider financial and strategic MCSs to be less important for their portfolios’ startups than equity financiers do, debt financiers perceive MCSs as more important for their initial investment decisions. Originality/value The study sheds new light on the importance of different MCS categories in startups by analyzing external financiers’ perceptions. Overall, the empirical study provides insights that are particularly valuable for startups seeking external financing for company growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners from multiple disciplines to disseminate information on organizational and accounting systems change. To achieve this, the journal will be directed at mapping out contemporary changes in the new global business environment. It will seek to explain the new techniques, processes, and philosophies associated with the rise of strategy-oriented accounting and information systems.
期刊最新文献
Show me? Inspire me? Make me? An institutional theory exploration of social and environmental reporting practices Toward an epistemology for anarchist accounting and stakeholder relationship capability: evidence from Iran Does the Directive of the European Union on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information improve reporting? Corporate reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals: a structured literature review and research agenda Value for money (VFM) in private finance initiative (PFI) implementation in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1