追求实质正义:在国际商法的灵活性与确定性之间导航

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2014-09-23 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2014.064929
P. Okoli
{"title":"追求实质正义:在国际商法的灵活性与确定性之间导航","authors":"P. Okoli","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2014.064929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competing approaches of legal certainty and legal flexibility have since formed a significant debate in international commercial law. This article, in the main, argues from a common law perspective using thematic analyses in the following respects: the quest for justice, the possibility of developing a common legal culture in light of some commercial uncertainties and the real status of legal certainty in the European Union with respect to the Brussels Regulation. It concludes that there is a need to develop a framework which guarantees substantial regularity without compromising the need to ensure that substantial justice always prevails.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"87 1","pages":"376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In pursuit of substantial justice: navigating between flexibility and certainty in international commercial law\",\"authors\":\"P. Okoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2014.064929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The competing approaches of legal certainty and legal flexibility have since formed a significant debate in international commercial law. This article, in the main, argues from a common law perspective using thematic analyses in the following respects: the quest for justice, the possibility of developing a common legal culture in light of some commercial uncertainties and the real status of legal certainty in the European Union with respect to the Brussels Regulation. It concludes that there is a need to develop a framework which guarantees substantial regularity without compromising the need to ensure that substantial justice always prevails.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.064929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.064929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此后,法律确定性和法律灵活性这两种相互竞争的方法在国际商法中形成了重大辩论。本文主要从普通法的角度,通过专题分析,从以下几个方面进行论证:对正义的追求,在一些商业不确定性的情况下发展共同法律文化的可能性,以及欧盟法律确定性的实际地位。它的结论是,有必要制定一个框架,在不损害确保实质正义始终占上风的需要的情况下,保证实质的规律性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In pursuit of substantial justice: navigating between flexibility and certainty in international commercial law
The competing approaches of legal certainty and legal flexibility have since formed a significant debate in international commercial law. This article, in the main, argues from a common law perspective using thematic analyses in the following respects: the quest for justice, the possibility of developing a common legal culture in light of some commercial uncertainties and the real status of legal certainty in the European Union with respect to the Brussels Regulation. It concludes that there is a need to develop a framework which guarantees substantial regularity without compromising the need to ensure that substantial justice always prevails.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1