{"title":"有限和全高内边界均质和复合椭圆流模型的不受限制压力瞬态解","authors":"Leif Larsen","doi":"10.2118/196842-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Pressure-transient solutions for homogeneous and composite elliptical flow models have been presented by several authors over the past 40 years, but all have computational limitations, either with respect to time range or degree of eccentricity of elliptical boundaries. This paper removes these limitations on time and eccentricity with a new fully flexible computational scheme for unbounded and bounded homogeneous and composite elliptical flow also extended to cases with a limited-height inner boundary, thus also covering horizontal well scenarios in composite elliptic models.\n Kuchuk and Brigham's (1979) Laplace-space solution is fully flexible with respect to the shape of ellipses, but has a lower limit on time that does not reach purely linear early data unless slow extended precision computations are used. However, this limitation can be removed with the approach of Riley et al. (1991) using asymptotic expansions for early data and Kuchuk and Brigham's (1979) solution for late data. This works for a fracture as inner boundary but has restrictions on the outer boundary. Another asymptotic expansion was used by van den Hoek (2016) to derive a more flexible but not fully flexible solution, since limitations remain for highly eccentric scenarios. This paper extends results from these references with other asymptotic expansions to achieve full flexibility on time and eccentricity.\n A wide range of examples are included to highlight the flexibility and utility of the new solutions, with cases ranging from damage-zone dimensions to long-time injection-falloff scenarios, but only as stationary cases with emphasis on the dimensions of the scenarios. Contrasts between exact degenerate elliptical models and standard solutions for infinite-conductivity fractures based on uniform-flux models and an equivalent pressure point are also discussed briefly. This concerns a solution artifact that might be overlooked. With a limited-height fracture used as a horizontal well replacement, cases are also included for horizontal wells in composite elliptical models.","PeriodicalId":10977,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unrestricted Pressure-Transient Solutions for Homogeneous and Composite Elliptical Flow Models with Limited and Full Height Inner Boundary\",\"authors\":\"Leif Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/196842-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Pressure-transient solutions for homogeneous and composite elliptical flow models have been presented by several authors over the past 40 years, but all have computational limitations, either with respect to time range or degree of eccentricity of elliptical boundaries. This paper removes these limitations on time and eccentricity with a new fully flexible computational scheme for unbounded and bounded homogeneous and composite elliptical flow also extended to cases with a limited-height inner boundary, thus also covering horizontal well scenarios in composite elliptic models.\\n Kuchuk and Brigham's (1979) Laplace-space solution is fully flexible with respect to the shape of ellipses, but has a lower limit on time that does not reach purely linear early data unless slow extended precision computations are used. However, this limitation can be removed with the approach of Riley et al. (1991) using asymptotic expansions for early data and Kuchuk and Brigham's (1979) solution for late data. This works for a fracture as inner boundary but has restrictions on the outer boundary. Another asymptotic expansion was used by van den Hoek (2016) to derive a more flexible but not fully flexible solution, since limitations remain for highly eccentric scenarios. This paper extends results from these references with other asymptotic expansions to achieve full flexibility on time and eccentricity.\\n A wide range of examples are included to highlight the flexibility and utility of the new solutions, with cases ranging from damage-zone dimensions to long-time injection-falloff scenarios, but only as stationary cases with emphasis on the dimensions of the scenarios. Contrasts between exact degenerate elliptical models and standard solutions for infinite-conductivity fractures based on uniform-flux models and an equivalent pressure point are also discussed briefly. This concerns a solution artifact that might be overlooked. With a limited-height fracture used as a horizontal well replacement, cases are also included for horizontal wells in composite elliptical models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/196842-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196842-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去的40年里,已经有几位作者提出了均匀和复合椭圆流模型的压力瞬态解,但它们都有计算局限性,要么是时间范围,要么是椭圆边界的偏心度。本文采用了一种新的完全灵活的计算方案,消除了这些时间和偏心的限制,该方案适用于无界和有界均匀和复合椭圆流,并扩展到具有有限高度内边界的情况,从而也涵盖了复合椭圆模型中的水平井场景。Kuchuk和Brigham(1979)的拉普拉斯空间解在椭圆形状方面是完全灵活的,但在时间上有下限,除非使用缓慢的扩展精度计算,否则不能达到纯线性的早期数据。然而,这种限制可以通过Riley等人(1991)对早期数据使用渐近展开式和Kuchuk和Brigham(1979)对晚期数据的解决方案来消除。这适用于作为内边界的裂缝,但对外边界有限制。van den Hoek(2016)使用了另一个渐近展开来推导出一个更灵活但不是完全灵活的解决方案,因为对于高度偏心的场景仍然存在限制。本文用其他渐近展开式推广了这些文献的结果,以获得在时间和偏心上的充分灵活性。为了突出新解决方案的灵活性和实用性,包括从损伤区域尺寸到长时间注入脱落场景的各种案例,但仅作为固定案例,强调了场景的尺寸。并简要讨论了基于均匀通量模型和等效压力点的无限导流裂缝精确简并椭圆模型与标准解的对比。这涉及到一个可能被忽略的解决方案工件。随着有限高度裂缝被用作水平井的替代,在复合椭圆模型中也包括了水平井的情况。
Unrestricted Pressure-Transient Solutions for Homogeneous and Composite Elliptical Flow Models with Limited and Full Height Inner Boundary
Pressure-transient solutions for homogeneous and composite elliptical flow models have been presented by several authors over the past 40 years, but all have computational limitations, either with respect to time range or degree of eccentricity of elliptical boundaries. This paper removes these limitations on time and eccentricity with a new fully flexible computational scheme for unbounded and bounded homogeneous and composite elliptical flow also extended to cases with a limited-height inner boundary, thus also covering horizontal well scenarios in composite elliptic models.
Kuchuk and Brigham's (1979) Laplace-space solution is fully flexible with respect to the shape of ellipses, but has a lower limit on time that does not reach purely linear early data unless slow extended precision computations are used. However, this limitation can be removed with the approach of Riley et al. (1991) using asymptotic expansions for early data and Kuchuk and Brigham's (1979) solution for late data. This works for a fracture as inner boundary but has restrictions on the outer boundary. Another asymptotic expansion was used by van den Hoek (2016) to derive a more flexible but not fully flexible solution, since limitations remain for highly eccentric scenarios. This paper extends results from these references with other asymptotic expansions to achieve full flexibility on time and eccentricity.
A wide range of examples are included to highlight the flexibility and utility of the new solutions, with cases ranging from damage-zone dimensions to long-time injection-falloff scenarios, but only as stationary cases with emphasis on the dimensions of the scenarios. Contrasts between exact degenerate elliptical models and standard solutions for infinite-conductivity fractures based on uniform-flux models and an equivalent pressure point are also discussed briefly. This concerns a solution artifact that might be overlooked. With a limited-height fracture used as a horizontal well replacement, cases are also included for horizontal wells in composite elliptical models.