Luts-V:一种评估男性下尿路症状的新的简化评分

C. Silva, Ueslei Menezes de Araujo, M. Alvaia, K. S. Freitas, T. Tiraboschi, C. Gomes, J. B. Bessa Júnior
{"title":"Luts-V:一种评估男性下尿路症状的新的简化评分","authors":"C. Silva, Ueslei Menezes de Araujo, M. Alvaia, K. S. Freitas, T. Tiraboschi, C. Gomes, J. B. Bessa Júnior","doi":"10.1101/2020.05.05.20091835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To validate a new simplified score for the assessment of men with LUTS (LUTS-V). METHODS: We made adjustments to the VPSS, resulting in a new simplified instrument (LUTS visual score - LUTS-V). In a pilot study, LUTS-V was administered to 50 men to identify interpretation issues. We used the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as the gold standard to validate the new tool in 306 men. The total IPSS and LUTS-V scores for each subject were evaluated and we used Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation plot to assess the agreement between the scores. A ROC curve was utilized to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LUTS-V and its diagnostic properties were described in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values. RESULTS: Median age was 59 [52-67] years and, according to the IPSS, 26 (8.7%) patients had severe symptoms, while 99 (33%) had moderate symptoms, and 175 (58.3%) had mild symptoms. We found a positive correlation between the IPSS and LUTS-V (r = 0.72; p < 0.0001). The bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the two questionnaires. We found LUTS-V to have a diagnostic accuracy to detect more severe cases of 83% (95% CI: [78-87%]; p < 0.001), as estimated by the area under the ROC curve. The cut-off value of [≥] 4 points was the best threshold, with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 78%, which resulted in a negative predictive value of 81% and a positive predictive value of 71% in this scenario. Median completion time was 0.51 [0.41-1.07] min for LUTS-V and 2.5 [2.2-3.4] min for the IPSS (p < 0.0001). Also, 91.5% of patients completed the questionnaires with no help, while the other 8.5% were interviewed. CONCLUSION: LUTS-V is a simple, self-administered tool with a significant discriminating power to identify patients with moderate to severe symptoms.","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Luts-V: A new simplified score for assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in men\",\"authors\":\"C. Silva, Ueslei Menezes de Araujo, M. Alvaia, K. S. Freitas, T. Tiraboschi, C. Gomes, J. B. Bessa Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2020.05.05.20091835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To validate a new simplified score for the assessment of men with LUTS (LUTS-V). METHODS: We made adjustments to the VPSS, resulting in a new simplified instrument (LUTS visual score - LUTS-V). In a pilot study, LUTS-V was administered to 50 men to identify interpretation issues. We used the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as the gold standard to validate the new tool in 306 men. The total IPSS and LUTS-V scores for each subject were evaluated and we used Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation plot to assess the agreement between the scores. A ROC curve was utilized to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LUTS-V and its diagnostic properties were described in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values. RESULTS: Median age was 59 [52-67] years and, according to the IPSS, 26 (8.7%) patients had severe symptoms, while 99 (33%) had moderate symptoms, and 175 (58.3%) had mild symptoms. We found a positive correlation between the IPSS and LUTS-V (r = 0.72; p < 0.0001). The bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the two questionnaires. We found LUTS-V to have a diagnostic accuracy to detect more severe cases of 83% (95% CI: [78-87%]; p < 0.001), as estimated by the area under the ROC curve. The cut-off value of [≥] 4 points was the best threshold, with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 78%, which resulted in a negative predictive value of 81% and a positive predictive value of 71% in this scenario. Median completion time was 0.51 [0.41-1.07] min for LUTS-V and 2.5 [2.2-3.4] min for the IPSS (p < 0.0001). Also, 91.5% of patients completed the questionnaires with no help, while the other 8.5% were interviewed. CONCLUSION: LUTS-V is a simple, self-administered tool with a significant discriminating power to identify patients with moderate to severe symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.05.20091835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:验证一种新的简化LUTS男性评估评分(LUTS- v)。方法:我们对VPSS进行调整,形成一种新的简化仪器(LUTS视觉评分- LUTS- v)。在一项初步研究中,LUTS-V被用于50名男性,以确定解释问题。我们使用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)作为金标准来验证306名男性的新工具。评估每个受试者的IPSS和LUTS-V总分,并使用Bland-Altman分析和Pearson相关图来评估得分之间的一致性。采用ROC曲线确定LUTS-V的诊断准确性,并从敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值等方面描述其诊断特性。结果:中位年龄为59岁[52-67]岁,根据IPSS,重度症状26例(8.7%),中度症状99例(33%),轻度症状175例(58.3%)。我们发现IPSS与LUTS-V呈正相关(r = 0.72;P < 0.0001)。bland-Altman分析显示两份问卷吻合良好。我们发现LUTS-V检测更严重病例的诊断准确率为83% (95% CI: [78-87%];p < 0.001),由ROC曲线下的面积估计。截断值[≥]4分为最佳阈值,敏感性为74%,特异性为78%,阴性预测值为81%,阳性预测值为71%。LUTS-V的中位完成时间为0.51 [0.41-1.07]min, IPSS的中位完成时间为2.5 [2.2-3.4]min (p < 0.0001)。91.5%的患者在没有帮助的情况下完成了问卷,而其他8.5%的患者接受了访谈。结论:LUTS-V是一种简单、自我给药的工具,具有显著的鉴别能力,可识别中重度症状患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Luts-V: A new simplified score for assessing lower urinary tract symptoms in men
OBJECTIVE: To validate a new simplified score for the assessment of men with LUTS (LUTS-V). METHODS: We made adjustments to the VPSS, resulting in a new simplified instrument (LUTS visual score - LUTS-V). In a pilot study, LUTS-V was administered to 50 men to identify interpretation issues. We used the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as the gold standard to validate the new tool in 306 men. The total IPSS and LUTS-V scores for each subject were evaluated and we used Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation plot to assess the agreement between the scores. A ROC curve was utilized to determine the diagnostic accuracy of LUTS-V and its diagnostic properties were described in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values. RESULTS: Median age was 59 [52-67] years and, according to the IPSS, 26 (8.7%) patients had severe symptoms, while 99 (33%) had moderate symptoms, and 175 (58.3%) had mild symptoms. We found a positive correlation between the IPSS and LUTS-V (r = 0.72; p < 0.0001). The bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the two questionnaires. We found LUTS-V to have a diagnostic accuracy to detect more severe cases of 83% (95% CI: [78-87%]; p < 0.001), as estimated by the area under the ROC curve. The cut-off value of [≥] 4 points was the best threshold, with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 78%, which resulted in a negative predictive value of 81% and a positive predictive value of 71% in this scenario. Median completion time was 0.51 [0.41-1.07] min for LUTS-V and 2.5 [2.2-3.4] min for the IPSS (p < 0.0001). Also, 91.5% of patients completed the questionnaires with no help, while the other 8.5% were interviewed. CONCLUSION: LUTS-V is a simple, self-administered tool with a significant discriminating power to identify patients with moderate to severe symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advocating hormonal treatment to prevent adult infertility in patients diagnosed with congenital undescended testes REPLY TO THE AUTHORS: Re: One-day voiding diary in the evaluation of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in children Vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) in bladder cancer diagnosis in review in this number of International Brazilian Journal of Urology The evolution of stress urinary incontinence treatment techniques of the last three decades Impact of artificial urinary sphincter erosion in the reimplantation of the device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1