伊朗和国外研究降低剖宫产率的策略评估:叙述性回顾

Pub Date : 2020-06-06 DOI:10.15296/ijwhr.2021.45
Sedigheh Hasani Moghadam, F. Alijani, Nastaran Bagherian Afrakoti, M. Bazargan, J. Ganji
{"title":"伊朗和国外研究降低剖宫产率的策略评估:叙述性回顾","authors":"Sedigheh Hasani Moghadam, F. Alijani, Nastaran Bagherian Afrakoti, M. Bazargan, J. Ganji","doi":"10.15296/ijwhr.2021.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study was conducted aiming at exploring strategies for reducing cesarean section (C-section) in Iranian and foreign studies. Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out using a matrix approach and searching keywords including \"Cesarean\", \"Effective Intervention\", and \"Cesarean Section Reduction Strategy\" to find studies (2000-2019) in databases such as PubMed, SID, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and WHO. Results: CS reduction strategies were classified into 3 categories of psychological, clinical, and structural-policy interventions. The first category supports women throughout labor and childbirth by the midwife, doula, coping skills with fear and pain of labor, changes in the attitudes of service providers and pregnant women. Clinical interventions include vaginal birth after CS, vaginal breech delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation, encouragement of service providers into intermittent auscultation for the fetal heart rate instead of continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM), and training of service providers, pregnant woman, and her family. The last category encompassed managing insurance and financial services, receiving one-to-one care and midwifery care throughout active labor, and updating policy of labor induction in post-term pregnancy, as well as women’s admission policy with cervical dilatation of more than 4 cm with regular uterine contractions, active team care in labor, and auditing and feedback. Conclusions: It seems that multi-dimensional interventions are required to reduce the CS rate. Concerning some of the strategies (e.g., ECV), it is suggested that further research should be performed by addressing the limitations and drawbacks of previous studies before applying clinical procedures due to contradictory results.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Strategies for the Reduction of Cesarean Section Rate in Iranian and Foreign Studies: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Sedigheh Hasani Moghadam, F. Alijani, Nastaran Bagherian Afrakoti, M. Bazargan, J. Ganji\",\"doi\":\"10.15296/ijwhr.2021.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This study was conducted aiming at exploring strategies for reducing cesarean section (C-section) in Iranian and foreign studies. Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out using a matrix approach and searching keywords including \\\"Cesarean\\\", \\\"Effective Intervention\\\", and \\\"Cesarean Section Reduction Strategy\\\" to find studies (2000-2019) in databases such as PubMed, SID, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and WHO. Results: CS reduction strategies were classified into 3 categories of psychological, clinical, and structural-policy interventions. The first category supports women throughout labor and childbirth by the midwife, doula, coping skills with fear and pain of labor, changes in the attitudes of service providers and pregnant women. Clinical interventions include vaginal birth after CS, vaginal breech delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation, encouragement of service providers into intermittent auscultation for the fetal heart rate instead of continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM), and training of service providers, pregnant woman, and her family. The last category encompassed managing insurance and financial services, receiving one-to-one care and midwifery care throughout active labor, and updating policy of labor induction in post-term pregnancy, as well as women’s admission policy with cervical dilatation of more than 4 cm with regular uterine contractions, active team care in labor, and auditing and feedback. Conclusions: It seems that multi-dimensional interventions are required to reduce the CS rate. Concerning some of the strategies (e.g., ECV), it is suggested that further research should be performed by addressing the limitations and drawbacks of previous studies before applying clinical procedures due to contradictory results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2021.45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2021.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨伊朗和国外研究中减少剖宫产的策略。材料与方法:本研究采用矩阵法,在PubMed、SID、Science Direct、Google Scholar、WHO等数据库中检索“剖宫产”、“有效干预”、“剖宫产减少策略”等关键词,查找2000-2019年的相关研究。结果:CS减少策略分为心理、临床和结构政策干预3类。第一类通过助产士、助产师、应对恐惧和分娩痛苦的技能、服务提供者和孕妇态度的改变,在分娩和分娩过程中为妇女提供支持。临床干预措施包括CS后阴道分娩、阴道臀位分娩、臀位外型(ECV)、鼓励服务提供者间歇听诊胎儿心率而不是连续胎儿电子监测(EFM),以及对服务提供者、孕妇及其家人的培训。最后一类包括管理保险和金融服务,在产程中接受一对一护理和助产护理,更新足月后引产政策,宫颈扩张大于4cm且子宫收缩规律的妇女入院政策,产程中积极的团队护理,审计和反馈。结论:似乎需要多维干预来降低CS率。对于一些策略(如ECV),建议在应用临床程序之前,应进一步研究解决先前研究的局限性和缺点,因为结果相互矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Assessment of Strategies for the Reduction of Cesarean Section Rate in Iranian and Foreign Studies: A Narrative Review
Objectives: This study was conducted aiming at exploring strategies for reducing cesarean section (C-section) in Iranian and foreign studies. Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out using a matrix approach and searching keywords including "Cesarean", "Effective Intervention", and "Cesarean Section Reduction Strategy" to find studies (2000-2019) in databases such as PubMed, SID, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and WHO. Results: CS reduction strategies were classified into 3 categories of psychological, clinical, and structural-policy interventions. The first category supports women throughout labor and childbirth by the midwife, doula, coping skills with fear and pain of labor, changes in the attitudes of service providers and pregnant women. Clinical interventions include vaginal birth after CS, vaginal breech delivery, external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation, encouragement of service providers into intermittent auscultation for the fetal heart rate instead of continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM), and training of service providers, pregnant woman, and her family. The last category encompassed managing insurance and financial services, receiving one-to-one care and midwifery care throughout active labor, and updating policy of labor induction in post-term pregnancy, as well as women’s admission policy with cervical dilatation of more than 4 cm with regular uterine contractions, active team care in labor, and auditing and feedback. Conclusions: It seems that multi-dimensional interventions are required to reduce the CS rate. Concerning some of the strategies (e.g., ECV), it is suggested that further research should be performed by addressing the limitations and drawbacks of previous studies before applying clinical procedures due to contradictory results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1