影响准备、准备和重返工作/重返工作旅程的信心的个人倾向:受伤工人的观点

P. Odgers
{"title":"影响准备、准备和重返工作/重返工作旅程的信心的个人倾向:受伤工人的观点","authors":"P. Odgers","doi":"10.1017/idm.2014.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It is widely recognised that the type of injury sustained plays a role in an individual's ability to return to work (RTW). Employers are quick to point out, though, that the injury alone does not always impact an injured/unwell worker's RTW outcome. Objectives: The objectives of this research were to provide Comcare with greater insights and a better understanding of the factors that influence RTW outcomes for workers in the Australian federal workers’ compensation scheme. Methods: A total of 47 in-depth interviews were conducted with injured workers from both premium paying and self-insured organisations in four Australian States and Territories. An independent research company conducted the interviews on behalf of Comcare between December 2012 and February 2013. A purposeful sampling approach was employed, however, this was influenced by the willingness of people to participate. Findings: Personal situation, expectations of the organisation, relationship with the organisation and personality traits were identified as key factors influencing an individual's ability to return to work. The two driving characteristics of ‘personal resilience’ and ‘trust in the employer’ were used to identify four key types of claimants – Strivers, Temporarily Floored, Defensive & Entitled, and Victims. Discussion: Although individuals were found to have a clear disposition towards one typology over another, it was apparent that they could move between these typologies depending on how their RTW journey was going. For example, a ‘Temporarily Floored’ individual encountering perceived ‘unfair or harsh’ judgement from their employer could develop a ‘Victim’ mindset. Conclusion: Understanding that core individual dispositions impact a person's readiness, preparedness and confidence to RTW, has provided Comcare with the framework to further explore how we can identify and use these personal characteristics at the beginning of a claim to improve the recovery and RTW outcomes of our claimants.","PeriodicalId":53532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual dispositions that impact readiness, preparedness and confidence in returning to work / Return to work journey: an injured worker perspective\",\"authors\":\"P. Odgers\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/idm.2014.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: It is widely recognised that the type of injury sustained plays a role in an individual's ability to return to work (RTW). Employers are quick to point out, though, that the injury alone does not always impact an injured/unwell worker's RTW outcome. Objectives: The objectives of this research were to provide Comcare with greater insights and a better understanding of the factors that influence RTW outcomes for workers in the Australian federal workers’ compensation scheme. Methods: A total of 47 in-depth interviews were conducted with injured workers from both premium paying and self-insured organisations in four Australian States and Territories. An independent research company conducted the interviews on behalf of Comcare between December 2012 and February 2013. A purposeful sampling approach was employed, however, this was influenced by the willingness of people to participate. Findings: Personal situation, expectations of the organisation, relationship with the organisation and personality traits were identified as key factors influencing an individual's ability to return to work. The two driving characteristics of ‘personal resilience’ and ‘trust in the employer’ were used to identify four key types of claimants – Strivers, Temporarily Floored, Defensive & Entitled, and Victims. Discussion: Although individuals were found to have a clear disposition towards one typology over another, it was apparent that they could move between these typologies depending on how their RTW journey was going. For example, a ‘Temporarily Floored’ individual encountering perceived ‘unfair or harsh’ judgement from their employer could develop a ‘Victim’ mindset. Conclusion: Understanding that core individual dispositions impact a person's readiness, preparedness and confidence to RTW, has provided Comcare with the framework to further explore how we can identify and use these personal characteristics at the beginning of a claim to improve the recovery and RTW outcomes of our claimants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Disability Management\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Disability Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2014.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2014.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们普遍认为,受伤的类型在个人重返工作岗位(RTW)的能力中起着重要作用。然而,雇主们很快指出,受伤本身并不总是影响受伤/身体不适的工人的转职结果。目的:本研究的目的是为Comcare提供更深入的见解,更好地了解影响澳大利亚联邦工人补偿计划中工人RTW结果的因素。方法:对澳大利亚四个州和地区的保费支付和自我保险组织的受伤工人进行了总共47次深入访谈。一家独立研究公司在2012年12月至2013年2月期间代表Comcare进行了访谈。采用了有目的的抽样方法,然而,这受到人们参与意愿的影响。研究发现:个人情况、对组织的期望、与组织的关系和个性特征被确定为影响个人重返工作岗位能力的关键因素。“个人适应力”和“对雇主的信任”这两个驱动特征被用来确定四种关键类型的索赔人——奋斗者、暂时被解雇者、防御性和有权索赔者以及受害者。讨论:尽管个体被发现对一种类型有明确的倾向,但很明显,他们可以根据他们的RTW旅程进行情况在这些类型之间移动。例如,一个“暂时被解雇”的人遇到雇主“不公平或严厉”的判断,可能会形成“受害者”心态。结论:了解核心个人性格会影响一个人对RTW的准备,准备和信心,为Comcare提供了一个框架,以进一步探索我们如何在索赔开始时识别和使用这些个人特征,以提高索赔人的恢复和RTW结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual dispositions that impact readiness, preparedness and confidence in returning to work / Return to work journey: an injured worker perspective
Background: It is widely recognised that the type of injury sustained plays a role in an individual's ability to return to work (RTW). Employers are quick to point out, though, that the injury alone does not always impact an injured/unwell worker's RTW outcome. Objectives: The objectives of this research were to provide Comcare with greater insights and a better understanding of the factors that influence RTW outcomes for workers in the Australian federal workers’ compensation scheme. Methods: A total of 47 in-depth interviews were conducted with injured workers from both premium paying and self-insured organisations in four Australian States and Territories. An independent research company conducted the interviews on behalf of Comcare between December 2012 and February 2013. A purposeful sampling approach was employed, however, this was influenced by the willingness of people to participate. Findings: Personal situation, expectations of the organisation, relationship with the organisation and personality traits were identified as key factors influencing an individual's ability to return to work. The two driving characteristics of ‘personal resilience’ and ‘trust in the employer’ were used to identify four key types of claimants – Strivers, Temporarily Floored, Defensive & Entitled, and Victims. Discussion: Although individuals were found to have a clear disposition towards one typology over another, it was apparent that they could move between these typologies depending on how their RTW journey was going. For example, a ‘Temporarily Floored’ individual encountering perceived ‘unfair or harsh’ judgement from their employer could develop a ‘Victim’ mindset. Conclusion: Understanding that core individual dispositions impact a person's readiness, preparedness and confidence to RTW, has provided Comcare with the framework to further explore how we can identify and use these personal characteristics at the beginning of a claim to improve the recovery and RTW outcomes of our claimants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Disability Management
International Journal of Disability Management Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voraussetzungen für eine erfolgreiche Implementierung Vorteile eines gelingenden DisAbility-Managements Interrelated Factors for Return to Work of Sick-Listed Employees in Sweden Disclosing a Diagnosis in the Workplace: Perspective of People With Multiple Sclerosis Mögliche Widerstände
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1