数据所有权和消费者保护

Eric Tjong Tjin Tai
{"title":"数据所有权和消费者保护","authors":"Eric Tjong Tjin Tai","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3172725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The possibility of ownership of data, or data property, is denied by most legal scholars. However, on closer inspection there exists an actual form of control over data files (instead of the information as such), which allows a limited recognition of property of data files. It is argued that this form of data ownership needs to be recognised. This is first shown by comparative research into the remedy of reclaiming data. Secondly it is argued that data ownership allows a more precise analysis of the practice of data harvesting, by showing that data ownership does not include ownership of licensed copies of data files.","PeriodicalId":15724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law","volume":"87 1","pages":"136-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data ownership and consumer protection\",\"authors\":\"Eric Tjong Tjin Tai\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3172725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The possibility of ownership of data, or data property, is denied by most legal scholars. However, on closer inspection there exists an actual form of control over data files (instead of the information as such), which allows a limited recognition of property of data files. It is argued that this form of data ownership needs to be recognised. This is first shown by comparative research into the remedy of reclaiming data. Secondly it is argued that data ownership allows a more precise analysis of the practice of data harvesting, by showing that data ownership does not include ownership of licensed copies of data files.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"136-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3172725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Consumer and Market Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3172725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

数据所有权或数据财产的可能性被大多数法律学者所否认。然而,仔细观察就会发现,存在一种对数据文件的实际控制形式(而不是信息本身),这允许对数据文件的属性进行有限的识别。有人认为,这种形式的数据所有权需要得到承认。这首先通过对数据回收补救方法的比较研究得到证明。其次,有人认为,通过表明数据所有权不包括数据文件的许可副本的所有权,数据所有权允许对数据收集实践进行更精确的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data ownership and consumer protection
The possibility of ownership of data, or data property, is denied by most legal scholars. However, on closer inspection there exists an actual form of control over data files (instead of the information as such), which allows a limited recognition of property of data files. It is argued that this form of data ownership needs to be recognised. This is first shown by comparative research into the remedy of reclaiming data. Secondly it is argued that data ownership allows a more precise analysis of the practice of data harvesting, by showing that data ownership does not include ownership of licensed copies of data files.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consumer ADR in the Republic of Cyprus Citizens as Consumers in the Data Economy: The Case of Smart Cities Data ownership and consumer protection Does the Amazon Dash Button Violate EU Consumer Law? Balancing Consumer Protection and Technological Innovation in the Internet of Things Metamorphosis? The Role of Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Cases Concerning National Remedies and Procedures Under Directive 93/13/EEC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1