迪拉大学转诊医院医疗废物的产生、组成和管理实践:一项横断面研究

IF 2.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Environment Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/27658511.2021.1988383
Girum Gebremeskel Kanno, B. N. Gondol, Tizalegn Tesfaye Mamo, Abriham Shiferaw Areba1, Zemachu Ashuro Lagiso, Awash Alembo Tsebe, Miheret Tesfu Legesse, Daniel Abera Dansa, M. Admasu, Dagmawit Tesfaye, G. Sisay, Negassa Eshete, Mekonnen Birhanie Aregu
{"title":"迪拉大学转诊医院医疗废物的产生、组成和管理实践:一项横断面研究","authors":"Girum Gebremeskel Kanno, B. N. Gondol, Tizalegn Tesfaye Mamo, Abriham Shiferaw Areba1, Zemachu Ashuro Lagiso, Awash Alembo Tsebe, Miheret Tesfu Legesse, Daniel Abera Dansa, M. Admasu, Dagmawit Tesfaye, G. Sisay, Negassa Eshete, Mekonnen Birhanie Aregu","doi":"10.1080/27658511.2021.1988383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Improper collection, segregation, transportation, treatment, and disposal of healthcare waste pose risk to public health and the environment. This study aimed to determine healthcare waste generation rate, composition, and management practice in Dilla University Referral Hospital. Methods Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Dilla University Referral Hospital from May 2019 to June 2019. The quantitative data were collected for eight consecutive days using direct measurement of healthcare waste. The qualitative data were collected by using an observational checklist, and in-depth interview. The collected qualitative data were transcribed, and thematic content analysis was done. A total of 1212.5 kg of healthcare waste was generated in the study period with an average of 151.56 kg (±73.4). The hazardous fraction of the healthcare waste was 581.9 kg (48%) while the generation rate was 0.866 kg bed−1day−1. General waste accounted for 630.6 kg (52%) of the total healthcare waste generated in the teaching hospital, followed by infectious waste at 299.5 kg (24.7%). There was no segregation of healthcare waste by type at the point of generation and there was no pre-treatment of infectious wastes. The placenta pit was used for pathological wastes and open burning was the main disposal mechanism for the remaining wastes. The finding indicated that the proportion of the hazardous waste generated from the hospital was above the World Health Organization recommended threshold. There was a lack of appropriate waste segregation, storage, transport, and disposal practices in the referral hospital. Abbreviations: DURH- Dilla University Referral HospitalHCW- Health Care WasteICU- Intensive Care UnitNICU- Neonatal Intensive Care UnitOR- Operation RoomOPD- Out Patient DepartmentSD- Standard DeviationSDG- Sustainable Development GoalsSNNPRS- Southern Nation Nationality and People Regional StateWHO-World Health Organization","PeriodicalId":29858,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare waste generation, composition and management practice in Dilla university referral hospital: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Girum Gebremeskel Kanno, B. N. Gondol, Tizalegn Tesfaye Mamo, Abriham Shiferaw Areba1, Zemachu Ashuro Lagiso, Awash Alembo Tsebe, Miheret Tesfu Legesse, Daniel Abera Dansa, M. Admasu, Dagmawit Tesfaye, G. Sisay, Negassa Eshete, Mekonnen Birhanie Aregu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/27658511.2021.1988383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Improper collection, segregation, transportation, treatment, and disposal of healthcare waste pose risk to public health and the environment. This study aimed to determine healthcare waste generation rate, composition, and management practice in Dilla University Referral Hospital. Methods Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Dilla University Referral Hospital from May 2019 to June 2019. The quantitative data were collected for eight consecutive days using direct measurement of healthcare waste. The qualitative data were collected by using an observational checklist, and in-depth interview. The collected qualitative data were transcribed, and thematic content analysis was done. A total of 1212.5 kg of healthcare waste was generated in the study period with an average of 151.56 kg (±73.4). The hazardous fraction of the healthcare waste was 581.9 kg (48%) while the generation rate was 0.866 kg bed−1day−1. General waste accounted for 630.6 kg (52%) of the total healthcare waste generated in the teaching hospital, followed by infectious waste at 299.5 kg (24.7%). There was no segregation of healthcare waste by type at the point of generation and there was no pre-treatment of infectious wastes. The placenta pit was used for pathological wastes and open burning was the main disposal mechanism for the remaining wastes. The finding indicated that the proportion of the hazardous waste generated from the hospital was above the World Health Organization recommended threshold. There was a lack of appropriate waste segregation, storage, transport, and disposal practices in the referral hospital. Abbreviations: DURH- Dilla University Referral HospitalHCW- Health Care WasteICU- Intensive Care UnitNICU- Neonatal Intensive Care UnitOR- Operation RoomOPD- Out Patient DepartmentSD- Standard DeviationSDG- Sustainable Development GoalsSNNPRS- Southern Nation Nationality and People Regional StateWHO-World Health Organization\",\"PeriodicalId\":29858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Environment\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.1988383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.1988383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

医疗废物的不当收集、分离、运输、处理和处置对公众健康和环境构成风险。本研究旨在确定迪拉大学转诊医院的医疗废物产生率、组成和管理实践。方法2019年5月至2019年6月在迪拉大学转诊医院进行基于机构的横断面研究。通过直接测量医疗废物,连续8天收集定量数据。采用观察性检查表和深度访谈法收集定性数据。对收集到的定性数据进行转录,并进行专题内容分析。研究期间共产生医疗垃圾1212.5 kg,平均151.56 kg(±73.4)。医疗废弃物有害组分为581.9 kg(48%),产生率为0.866 kg(床- 1day - 1)。一般废物占教学医院医疗废物总量的630.6 kg(52%),其次是感染性废物299.5 kg(24.7%)。在产生时没有按类型对医疗废物进行分类,也没有对感染性废物进行预处理。病理废物采用胎盘坑处理,剩余废物以露天焚烧处理为主。调查结果表明,该医院产生的有害废物比例高于世界卫生组织建议的阈值。转诊医院缺乏适当的废物分类、储存、运输和处置做法。缩写:DURH-迪拉大学转诊医院hcw -卫生保健废物icu -重症监护病房nicu -新生儿重症监护病房opd -门诊sd -标准差sdg -可持续发展目标snnprs -南方国家民族和人民地区国家who -世界卫生组织
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare waste generation, composition and management practice in Dilla university referral hospital: a cross-sectional study
ABSTRACT Improper collection, segregation, transportation, treatment, and disposal of healthcare waste pose risk to public health and the environment. This study aimed to determine healthcare waste generation rate, composition, and management practice in Dilla University Referral Hospital. Methods Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Dilla University Referral Hospital from May 2019 to June 2019. The quantitative data were collected for eight consecutive days using direct measurement of healthcare waste. The qualitative data were collected by using an observational checklist, and in-depth interview. The collected qualitative data were transcribed, and thematic content analysis was done. A total of 1212.5 kg of healthcare waste was generated in the study period with an average of 151.56 kg (±73.4). The hazardous fraction of the healthcare waste was 581.9 kg (48%) while the generation rate was 0.866 kg bed−1day−1. General waste accounted for 630.6 kg (52%) of the total healthcare waste generated in the teaching hospital, followed by infectious waste at 299.5 kg (24.7%). There was no segregation of healthcare waste by type at the point of generation and there was no pre-treatment of infectious wastes. The placenta pit was used for pathological wastes and open burning was the main disposal mechanism for the remaining wastes. The finding indicated that the proportion of the hazardous waste generated from the hospital was above the World Health Organization recommended threshold. There was a lack of appropriate waste segregation, storage, transport, and disposal practices in the referral hospital. Abbreviations: DURH- Dilla University Referral HospitalHCW- Health Care WasteICU- Intensive Care UnitNICU- Neonatal Intensive Care UnitOR- Operation RoomOPD- Out Patient DepartmentSD- Standard DeviationSDG- Sustainable Development GoalsSNNPRS- Southern Nation Nationality and People Regional StateWHO-World Health Organization
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Environment
Sustainable Environment ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Exploring loss and damage from climate change and global perspectives that influence response mechanism in vulnerable communities Exploring knowledge, attitudes and practices of farmers at the edge of Budongo forest on agrochemicals usage Pesticides in use, their application and risks on human health and ecosystems: A case of Fogera District, Ethiopia Hidden hazards in urban soils: A meta-analysis review of global heavy metal contamination (2010-2022), sources and its Ecological and health consequences Do innovation, financial development and institutional quality matter in managing carbon risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1