马克思、恩格斯与学术劳动批判

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor Pub Date : 2016-08-01 DOI:10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I28.186209
Karen Gregory, J. Winn
{"title":"马克思、恩格斯与学术劳动批判","authors":"Karen Gregory, J. Winn","doi":"10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I28.186209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the production of this special issue of Workplace , we hope to contribute to a negative critique of academic labor that not only helps make such “productive” social relations more transparent, but situates academic labor as an object of critique within the discourse of recent developments in Marxist praxis. To undertake this, we sought papers that acknowledge the foundational work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels for labor theory and engaged closely and critically with the critique of political economy. Marx regarded his discovery of the “dual character” of labor in capitalism (i.e. concrete and abstract) as one of his most important achievements and “the pivot on which a clear comprehension of political economy turns.” (Marx, 1996, 51) With this in mind, we sought contributions that employ Marx’s and Engels’ critical categories of labor, value, the commodity, capital, etc. in reflexive ways which illuminate the role and character of academic labor today and how its existing form might be, according to Marx, abolished, transcended and overcome ( aufheben ).","PeriodicalId":42624,"journal":{"name":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marx, Engels and the critique of academic labor\",\"authors\":\"Karen Gregory, J. Winn\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I28.186209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the production of this special issue of Workplace , we hope to contribute to a negative critique of academic labor that not only helps make such “productive” social relations more transparent, but situates academic labor as an object of critique within the discourse of recent developments in Marxist praxis. To undertake this, we sought papers that acknowledge the foundational work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels for labor theory and engaged closely and critically with the critique of political economy. Marx regarded his discovery of the “dual character” of labor in capitalism (i.e. concrete and abstract) as one of his most important achievements and “the pivot on which a clear comprehension of political economy turns.” (Marx, 1996, 51) With this in mind, we sought contributions that employ Marx’s and Engels’ critical categories of labor, value, the commodity, capital, etc. in reflexive ways which illuminate the role and character of academic labor today and how its existing form might be, according to Marx, abolished, transcended and overcome ( aufheben ).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I28.186209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I28.186209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

随着《工作场所》特刊的出版,我们希望对学术劳动的负面批评有所贡献,这不仅有助于使这种“生产性”社会关系更加透明,而且将学术劳动置于马克思主义实践最新发展的话语中作为批评对象。为此,我们寻找承认卡尔·马克思和弗里德里希·恩格斯在劳动理论方面的基础性工作,并与政治经济学批判密切和批判性地联系在一起的论文。马克思认为他对资本主义劳动的“两重性”(即具体的和抽象的)的发现是他最重要的成就之一,也是“清晰理解政治经济学的支点”。(马克思,1996,51)考虑到这一点,我们寻求运用马克思和恩格斯的劳动、价值、商品、资本等批判范畴的贡献,以反思性的方式阐明了今天学术劳动的角色和特征,以及根据马克思的说法,它的现有形式如何被废除、超越和克服(aufheben)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Marx, Engels and the critique of academic labor
With the production of this special issue of Workplace , we hope to contribute to a negative critique of academic labor that not only helps make such “productive” social relations more transparent, but situates academic labor as an object of critique within the discourse of recent developments in Marxist praxis. To undertake this, we sought papers that acknowledge the foundational work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels for labor theory and engaged closely and critically with the critique of political economy. Marx regarded his discovery of the “dual character” of labor in capitalism (i.e. concrete and abstract) as one of his most important achievements and “the pivot on which a clear comprehension of political economy turns.” (Marx, 1996, 51) With this in mind, we sought contributions that employ Marx’s and Engels’ critical categories of labor, value, the commodity, capital, etc. in reflexive ways which illuminate the role and character of academic labor today and how its existing form might be, according to Marx, abolished, transcended and overcome ( aufheben ).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor
Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The All-Administrative Campus: University of British Columbia, Okanagan "Amos D. Squire, Chief Physician of Sing Sing, 1914-1925" and Other Poems Here We Come Resolving the Contradictions of Academic Unionism John Trudell and the Spirit of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1