北欧家具业的职业事故成本(瑞典、挪威、芬兰)

A. Söderqvist, T. Rundmo, M. Aaltonen
{"title":"北欧家具业的职业事故成本(瑞典、挪威、芬兰)","authors":"A. Söderqvist,&nbsp;T. Rundmo,&nbsp;M. Aaltonen","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90071-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Söderqvist, A., Rundmo, T. and Aaltonen, M., 1990. Costs of occupational accidents in the nordic furniture industry (Sweden, Norway, Finland). <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 12: 79–88.</p><p>An empirical study of the costs of occupational accidents was carried out during 1986-87 in 57 furniture companies in Finland, Norway and Sweden, employing 5,000 cabinet-makers. The sample covered 18 percent of the furniture manufacturing industry in the three countries. The main objective of this study was to increase safety management motivation. The layout of the study was identical in all three. A total of 460 accidents were investigated. The consequences of each accident were identified and analyzed.</p><p>The costing is based on three costing models, called the market pricing model, the accounting model, and the spare-capacity model. The latter was developed within the project and tested in Norway and Sweden. Total costs calculated with the spare-capacity model were 4 times greater than costs calculated with the market pricing model. The accounting model reflects management perception of losses, but is not adequate to mirror the true accident costs. Using of the traditional market pricing model, monetary losses can easily be underestimated.</p><p>The cost analyses indicate that the company costs for the sample of participating firms in Finland are 0.5%, in Norway 0.3% and in Sweden 0.2% of the total wages using the market pricing model. A substantial portion of the total costs were borne by other than the company. Owing to the differences of insurance rules, the costs that firms incur would appear to be about 63% in Finland, 44% in Norway and in Sweden only about 9% of costs for lost production time (<em>n</em> = 399).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 79-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90071-3","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costs of occupational accidents in the Nordic furniture industry (Sweden, Norway, FInland)\",\"authors\":\"A. Söderqvist,&nbsp;T. Rundmo,&nbsp;M. Aaltonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90071-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Söderqvist, A., Rundmo, T. and Aaltonen, M., 1990. Costs of occupational accidents in the nordic furniture industry (Sweden, Norway, Finland). <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 12: 79–88.</p><p>An empirical study of the costs of occupational accidents was carried out during 1986-87 in 57 furniture companies in Finland, Norway and Sweden, employing 5,000 cabinet-makers. The sample covered 18 percent of the furniture manufacturing industry in the three countries. The main objective of this study was to increase safety management motivation. The layout of the study was identical in all three. A total of 460 accidents were investigated. The consequences of each accident were identified and analyzed.</p><p>The costing is based on three costing models, called the market pricing model, the accounting model, and the spare-capacity model. The latter was developed within the project and tested in Norway and Sweden. Total costs calculated with the spare-capacity model were 4 times greater than costs calculated with the market pricing model. The accounting model reflects management perception of losses, but is not adequate to mirror the true accident costs. Using of the traditional market pricing model, monetary losses can easily be underestimated.</p><p>The cost analyses indicate that the company costs for the sample of participating firms in Finland are 0.5%, in Norway 0.3% and in Sweden 0.2% of the total wages using the market pricing model. A substantial portion of the total costs were borne by other than the company. Owing to the differences of insurance rules, the costs that firms incur would appear to be about 63% in Finland, 44% in Norway and in Sweden only about 9% of costs for lost production time (<em>n</em> = 399).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 79-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90071-3\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0376634990900713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0376634990900713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

Söderqvist, A., Rundmo, T.和altonen, M., 1990。北欧家具工业的职业事故费用(瑞典、挪威、芬兰)。职业事故学报,12:79-88。1986-87年期间,对芬兰、挪威和瑞典雇用5 000名橱柜制造商的57家家具公司进行了职业事故成本的实证研究。样本涵盖了这三个国家18%的家具制造业。本研究的主要目的是增加安全管理的动机。这三个书房的布局都是一样的。共调查了460起事故。对每起事故的后果进行了识别和分析。成本计算基于三种成本计算模型,即市场定价模型、会计模型和备用容量模型。后者是在该项目中开发的,并在挪威和瑞典进行了测试。用备用容量模型计算的总成本是用市场定价模型计算的成本的4倍。该会计模型反映了管理层对损失的认知,但不足以反映真实的事故成本。使用传统的市场定价模型,货币损失很容易被低估。成本分析表明,使用市场定价模型,芬兰参与公司样本的公司成本为总工资的0.5%,挪威为0.3%,瑞典为0.2%。总费用的很大一部分是由公司以外的人承担的。由于保险规则的不同,芬兰的公司所承担的成本约为63%,挪威为44%,瑞典仅为生产时间损失的9% (n = 399)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Costs of occupational accidents in the Nordic furniture industry (Sweden, Norway, FInland)

Söderqvist, A., Rundmo, T. and Aaltonen, M., 1990. Costs of occupational accidents in the nordic furniture industry (Sweden, Norway, Finland). Journal of Occupational Accidents, 12: 79–88.

An empirical study of the costs of occupational accidents was carried out during 1986-87 in 57 furniture companies in Finland, Norway and Sweden, employing 5,000 cabinet-makers. The sample covered 18 percent of the furniture manufacturing industry in the three countries. The main objective of this study was to increase safety management motivation. The layout of the study was identical in all three. A total of 460 accidents were investigated. The consequences of each accident were identified and analyzed.

The costing is based on three costing models, called the market pricing model, the accounting model, and the spare-capacity model. The latter was developed within the project and tested in Norway and Sweden. Total costs calculated with the spare-capacity model were 4 times greater than costs calculated with the market pricing model. The accounting model reflects management perception of losses, but is not adequate to mirror the true accident costs. Using of the traditional market pricing model, monetary losses can easily be underestimated.

The cost analyses indicate that the company costs for the sample of participating firms in Finland are 0.5%, in Norway 0.3% and in Sweden 0.2% of the total wages using the market pricing model. A substantial portion of the total costs were borne by other than the company. Owing to the differences of insurance rules, the costs that firms incur would appear to be about 63% in Finland, 44% in Norway and in Sweden only about 9% of costs for lost production time (n = 399).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The physiology of work Physical ergonomics job design: an accident prevention approach to control upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in manufacturing industry An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1