“数码经济”特刊

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Network Economics Pub Date : 2017-09-26 DOI:10.1515/rne-2018-0029
Paul Belleflamme, Alexandre de Cornière, Oliver Falck, A. Gautier
{"title":"“数码经济”特刊","authors":"Paul Belleflamme, Alexandre de Cornière, Oliver Falck, A. Gautier","doi":"10.1515/rne-2018-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of digitization has already had a profound impact on the functioning of the markets in the last decade, and it should bring even more interesting changes in the near future. This Special Issue on the Economics of Digitization includes four selected articles, which illustrate the implications of various aspects of digitization for consumers and firms. The analysis of price discrimination has recently taken a new – and very interesting – turn, almost one century after the concept was formally introduced (Pigou proposed the first taxonomy of price discrimination practices in his book “Economics of Welfare” in 1920). The reason for this renewed interest is to be found in the continuously decreasing costs of processing data and in improved data algorithms, which allow firms to know much more about their consumers’ willingness to pay. These technological developments have four important consequences for the economic analysis of price discrimination. First, perfect price discrimination is no longer seen as a theoretical benchmark but as a true possibility. Second, as consumers care about their privacy and can act to protect it, they become strategic players, meaning that firms must factor in the consumers’ potential reactions when they choose their pricing strategy. Third, as more firms can easily collect and process data, a more careful examination of competitive price discrimination is called for. Finally, as data is the necessary input for price discrimination, it becomes a commodity, whose trade needs to be analyzed. The article by Alexandre de Cornière and Rodrigo Montes (Consumer Privacy and the Incentives to Price-Discriminate in Online Markets) contributes to the first two issues: it studies the interaction between a monopoly firm, which can (imperfectly) identify consumers’ willingness to pay, and consumers, who can prevent","PeriodicalId":45659,"journal":{"name":"Review of Network Economics","volume":"89 1","pages":"239 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Issue on “Economics of Digitization”\",\"authors\":\"Paul Belleflamme, Alexandre de Cornière, Oliver Falck, A. Gautier\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rne-2018-0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The process of digitization has already had a profound impact on the functioning of the markets in the last decade, and it should bring even more interesting changes in the near future. This Special Issue on the Economics of Digitization includes four selected articles, which illustrate the implications of various aspects of digitization for consumers and firms. The analysis of price discrimination has recently taken a new – and very interesting – turn, almost one century after the concept was formally introduced (Pigou proposed the first taxonomy of price discrimination practices in his book “Economics of Welfare” in 1920). The reason for this renewed interest is to be found in the continuously decreasing costs of processing data and in improved data algorithms, which allow firms to know much more about their consumers’ willingness to pay. These technological developments have four important consequences for the economic analysis of price discrimination. First, perfect price discrimination is no longer seen as a theoretical benchmark but as a true possibility. Second, as consumers care about their privacy and can act to protect it, they become strategic players, meaning that firms must factor in the consumers’ potential reactions when they choose their pricing strategy. Third, as more firms can easily collect and process data, a more careful examination of competitive price discrimination is called for. Finally, as data is the necessary input for price discrimination, it becomes a commodity, whose trade needs to be analyzed. The article by Alexandre de Cornière and Rodrigo Montes (Consumer Privacy and the Incentives to Price-Discriminate in Online Markets) contributes to the first two issues: it studies the interaction between a monopoly firm, which can (imperfectly) identify consumers’ willingness to pay, and consumers, who can prevent\",\"PeriodicalId\":45659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2018-0029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Network Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2018-0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年里,数字化的进程已经对市场的运作产生了深远的影响,在不久的将来,它应该会带来更多有趣的变化。本期《数字化经济学》特刊精选了四篇文章,阐述了数字化对消费者和企业的各个方面的影响。在价格歧视这一概念被正式引入近一个世纪之后,对价格歧视的分析最近出现了一个新的、非常有趣的转折(庇古在1920年的《福利经济学》一书中首次提出了价格歧视的分类)。这种重新引起兴趣的原因在于数据处理成本的不断降低和数据算法的改进,这使得企业能够更多地了解消费者的支付意愿。这些技术发展对价格歧视的经济分析有四个重要影响。首先,完全价格歧视不再被视为理论基准,而是一种真实的可能性。其次,由于消费者关心自己的隐私,并能采取行动保护隐私,他们成为了战略参与者,这意味着企业在选择定价策略时必须考虑到消费者的潜在反应。第三,由于越来越多的公司可以轻松地收集和处理数据,因此需要对竞争性价格歧视进行更仔细的检查。最后,由于数据是价格歧视的必要输入,因此它成为一种商品,需要对其交易进行分析。Alexandre de cornires和Rodrigo Montes的文章(《在线市场中的消费者隐私和价格歧视动机》)对前两个问题做出了贡献:它研究了垄断公司(可以(不完全)识别消费者的支付意愿)和消费者(可以阻止)之间的相互作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Special Issue on “Economics of Digitization”
The process of digitization has already had a profound impact on the functioning of the markets in the last decade, and it should bring even more interesting changes in the near future. This Special Issue on the Economics of Digitization includes four selected articles, which illustrate the implications of various aspects of digitization for consumers and firms. The analysis of price discrimination has recently taken a new – and very interesting – turn, almost one century after the concept was formally introduced (Pigou proposed the first taxonomy of price discrimination practices in his book “Economics of Welfare” in 1920). The reason for this renewed interest is to be found in the continuously decreasing costs of processing data and in improved data algorithms, which allow firms to know much more about their consumers’ willingness to pay. These technological developments have four important consequences for the economic analysis of price discrimination. First, perfect price discrimination is no longer seen as a theoretical benchmark but as a true possibility. Second, as consumers care about their privacy and can act to protect it, they become strategic players, meaning that firms must factor in the consumers’ potential reactions when they choose their pricing strategy. Third, as more firms can easily collect and process data, a more careful examination of competitive price discrimination is called for. Finally, as data is the necessary input for price discrimination, it becomes a commodity, whose trade needs to be analyzed. The article by Alexandre de Cornière and Rodrigo Montes (Consumer Privacy and the Incentives to Price-Discriminate in Online Markets) contributes to the first two issues: it studies the interaction between a monopoly firm, which can (imperfectly) identify consumers’ willingness to pay, and consumers, who can prevent
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Review of Network Economics seeks to help policy makers, academics, and practitioners keep informed of new research and policy debate in network economics and related subjects that are relevant to the study of network industries. By publishing high quality research on topical issues relevant to network industries, it is hoped readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of the economic issues involved and that this will improve the quality of decision making by private and public organisations, and debate among researchers. The articles can cover specific network industries, or may deal with general issues that have relevance to a number of different network industries, including topics in the economics of networks, regulation, competition law, or industrial organisation. Papers that provide insights into policy debates are especially welcome, as are up-to-date surveys, book reviews, and comments.
期刊最新文献
Reform, Not Revolution, is What is Needed Now for Yardstick Competition The Quality of Interactions in Competition Between Social Media Platforms Mixed Bundling and Mergers Price-Cap Regulation of Firms That Supply Their Rivals A Signaling Theory of the Online Consumer Review Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1