超越理论的极限:埃塞俄比亚的选举威权主义(2005-2015)

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY South African Review of Sociology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21528586.2020.1761873
D. G. Kassa
{"title":"超越理论的极限:埃塞俄比亚的选举威权主义(2005-2015)","authors":"D. G. Kassa","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2020.1761873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Democratic transitions and consolidation stalled in many parts of Africa in the past three decades. Ethiopia followed a similar pattern of democratic recession, after promising openings at two important junctures, i.e. 1991 and 2005. In fact, the ruling party claimed a “100 percent victory” winning all the national parliament seats in the latest May 24, 2015 election. This article employs the case of Ethiopia to point at the limits of existing theoretical models on democratic transition explaining electoral authoritarianism. Consequently, the article underscores the need to go beyond the confines of institutional design, elite patronage, and modernization theory to factor in broader sociohistorical factors that buttress electoral authoritarianism. These, I submit, ought to include: (a) the historical sociology about the origin and development of the respective states themselves, and (b) their respective political cultures, and not least their histories of political violence.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"6 1","pages":"70 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Limits of Theory: Qualifying Electoral Authoritarianism in Ethiopia (2005–2015)\",\"authors\":\"D. G. Kassa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21528586.2020.1761873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Democratic transitions and consolidation stalled in many parts of Africa in the past three decades. Ethiopia followed a similar pattern of democratic recession, after promising openings at two important junctures, i.e. 1991 and 2005. In fact, the ruling party claimed a “100 percent victory” winning all the national parliament seats in the latest May 24, 2015 election. This article employs the case of Ethiopia to point at the limits of existing theoretical models on democratic transition explaining electoral authoritarianism. Consequently, the article underscores the need to go beyond the confines of institutional design, elite patronage, and modernization theory to factor in broader sociohistorical factors that buttress electoral authoritarianism. These, I submit, ought to include: (a) the historical sociology about the origin and development of the respective states themselves, and (b) their respective political cultures, and not least their histories of political violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"70 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2020.1761873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2020.1761873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在过去的三十年里,非洲许多地区的民主转型和巩固停滞不前。埃塞俄比亚在1991年和2005年这两个重要的转折点承诺开放之后,经历了类似的民主衰退模式。事实上,执政党在2015年5月24日的选举中声称“100%获胜”,赢得了所有的国会席位。本文以埃塞俄比亚为例,指出了解释选举威权主义的现有民主转型理论模型的局限性。因此,本文强调有必要超越制度设计、精英赞助和现代化理论的局限,考虑支持选举威权主义的更广泛的社会历史因素。我认为,这些应该包括:(a)关于各自国家本身的起源和发展的历史社会学,以及(b)各自的政治文化,尤其是政治暴力的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond the Limits of Theory: Qualifying Electoral Authoritarianism in Ethiopia (2005–2015)
ABSTRACT Democratic transitions and consolidation stalled in many parts of Africa in the past three decades. Ethiopia followed a similar pattern of democratic recession, after promising openings at two important junctures, i.e. 1991 and 2005. In fact, the ruling party claimed a “100 percent victory” winning all the national parliament seats in the latest May 24, 2015 election. This article employs the case of Ethiopia to point at the limits of existing theoretical models on democratic transition explaining electoral authoritarianism. Consequently, the article underscores the need to go beyond the confines of institutional design, elite patronage, and modernization theory to factor in broader sociohistorical factors that buttress electoral authoritarianism. These, I submit, ought to include: (a) the historical sociology about the origin and development of the respective states themselves, and (b) their respective political cultures, and not least their histories of political violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Guerrillas and combative mothers: women and the armed struggle in South Africa Menstruation and Society in South Africa: A Desktop Analysis Women from the South. Poetics of the Encounter with Asia and Africa “Fighting to Be a Real Man”: Constructions of Respectability and Contestations among African Migrant Men in Johannesburg Exploring Heteronormativity and the Illusion of the “Real Man”: A Case Study of Sivuyile (Siv) Ngesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1