竖向不规则MRF建筑响应修正系数评价

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings Pub Date : 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1680/jstbu.22.00146
M. M. Ahmed, M. Abdo, W. Mohamed
{"title":"竖向不规则MRF建筑响应修正系数评价","authors":"M. M. Ahmed, M. Abdo, W. Mohamed","doi":"10.1680/jstbu.22.00146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most design codes assume the nonlinear seismic performance of structures using response reduction/modification factor (R). The R factor is sensitive to a variety of factors in terms of overall ductility and over-strength. This research assesses the actual R factor for vertical irregularity cases for RC bare buildings with moment-resisting frames (MRF) systems. Also, this research derives a significant relationship between R values and identified vertical irregularity index calculated from relative stiffness between adjacent stories. Three-dimensional numerical models are carried out for the soft story and setback irregularity scenarios using ETABS. Modal pushover analysis (MPA) is selected to obtain the inelastic seismic capacity. The obtained results demonstrate that vertical irregular buildings have weak inelastic seismic capacities compared to regular one. So, the response modification factor (R) should be scaled down before the design stage by 15% to 40% for single and combined vertical irregularity scenarios. Structures with a combined asymmetric setback with a soft ground story experience the worst R factor. Also, R factors are sensitive to the identified vertical irregularity index (Vtm) that has 80% regression percent. So, it may be used to specify the allowable vertical irregularity ratio, location, and combination for each seismic zone.","PeriodicalId":54570,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response modification factor evaluation for vertical irregular MRF buildings\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Ahmed, M. Abdo, W. Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jstbu.22.00146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most design codes assume the nonlinear seismic performance of structures using response reduction/modification factor (R). The R factor is sensitive to a variety of factors in terms of overall ductility and over-strength. This research assesses the actual R factor for vertical irregularity cases for RC bare buildings with moment-resisting frames (MRF) systems. Also, this research derives a significant relationship between R values and identified vertical irregularity index calculated from relative stiffness between adjacent stories. Three-dimensional numerical models are carried out for the soft story and setback irregularity scenarios using ETABS. Modal pushover analysis (MPA) is selected to obtain the inelastic seismic capacity. The obtained results demonstrate that vertical irregular buildings have weak inelastic seismic capacities compared to regular one. So, the response modification factor (R) should be scaled down before the design stage by 15% to 40% for single and combined vertical irregularity scenarios. Structures with a combined asymmetric setback with a soft ground story experience the worst R factor. Also, R factors are sensitive to the identified vertical irregularity index (Vtm) that has 80% regression percent. So, it may be used to specify the allowable vertical irregularity ratio, location, and combination for each seismic zone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.22.00146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.22.00146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数设计规范使用响应折减/修正系数(R)来假设结构的非线性抗震性能。R因子对整体延性和超强度方面的各种因素都很敏感。本研究评估具有抗弯矩框架(MRF)系统的钢筋混凝土裸建筑垂直不规则情况的实际R因子。此外,本研究还得出了R值与相邻层间相对刚度计算的识别竖向不规则指数之间的显著关系。利用ETABS对软层和回退不平顺两种情况进行了三维数值模拟。选择模态推覆分析(MPA)来获得非弹性抗震能力。结果表明,竖向不规则建筑的非弹性抗震能力较规则建筑弱。因此,在设计阶段,对于单一和组合垂直不规则情况,响应修正因子(R)应按比例降低15%至40%。不对称后退与软地基层相结合的结构的R因子最差。此外,R因子对识别的垂直不规则指数(Vtm)敏感,其回归率为80%。因此,它可以用来规定每个地震带允许的垂直不规则比、位置和组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response modification factor evaluation for vertical irregular MRF buildings
Most design codes assume the nonlinear seismic performance of structures using response reduction/modification factor (R). The R factor is sensitive to a variety of factors in terms of overall ductility and over-strength. This research assesses the actual R factor for vertical irregularity cases for RC bare buildings with moment-resisting frames (MRF) systems. Also, this research derives a significant relationship between R values and identified vertical irregularity index calculated from relative stiffness between adjacent stories. Three-dimensional numerical models are carried out for the soft story and setback irregularity scenarios using ETABS. Modal pushover analysis (MPA) is selected to obtain the inelastic seismic capacity. The obtained results demonstrate that vertical irregular buildings have weak inelastic seismic capacities compared to regular one. So, the response modification factor (R) should be scaled down before the design stage by 15% to 40% for single and combined vertical irregularity scenarios. Structures with a combined asymmetric setback with a soft ground story experience the worst R factor. Also, R factors are sensitive to the identified vertical irregularity index (Vtm) that has 80% regression percent. So, it may be used to specify the allowable vertical irregularity ratio, location, and combination for each seismic zone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Structures and Buildings publishes peer-reviewed papers on the design and construction of civil engineering structures and the applied research associated with such activities. Topics include the design, strength, durability and behaviour of structural components and systems. Topics covered: energy conservation, people movement within and around buildings, strength and durability of steel and concrete structural components, and the behaviour of building and bridge components and systems
期刊最新文献
The engineering legacy of the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022: Al Janoub stadium A simplified approach for local buckling in metal-faced profiled sandwich panels Mechanical behavior of sheathing-to-framing connections in laminated bamboo lumber shear walls Lateral torsional capacity of steel beams in different loading conditions by neural network Strengthening of slender webs of steel plate girders using FRP composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1