{"title":"第一原理发动机模型的前期设计:轴承模型和实例结果","authors":"Zheng-Dong Ma, N. Perkins","doi":"10.1115/imece2001/dsc-24514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The design of new engine concepts requires an engineering tool that can quickly estimate noise, vibration and durability metrics at the very onset of the engine design cycle. In (Ma et al., 2000), we presented an engine modeling template (EMT) to support up-front engine design. The engine models generated from the EMT use the minimum set of generalized coordinates to represent engine dynamics. This is achieved by employing a pre-selected set of relative coordinates. The resulting engine model is cast as a (minimum) set of ordinary differential equations in lieu of the differential-algebraic equations that result from using commercial multibody dynamics codes. The resulting models then enjoy greater computational efficiency.\n In (Ma et al., 2000), we formulate the equations of motion for the engine and its major components. The objective of this paper is to review the numerical results obtained from sample engine designs and to discuss several tradeoffs between model accuracy and efficiency. Attention focuses on the trade-offs resulting from several bearing models, including linear and nonlinear spring-damper bearing models, and hydrodynamic bearing models based on the Reynolds equation. Results computed using these bearing models are critically compared.","PeriodicalId":90691,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A First Principle Engine Model for Up-Front Design: Bearing Models and Example Results\",\"authors\":\"Zheng-Dong Ma, N. Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2001/dsc-24514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The design of new engine concepts requires an engineering tool that can quickly estimate noise, vibration and durability metrics at the very onset of the engine design cycle. In (Ma et al., 2000), we presented an engine modeling template (EMT) to support up-front engine design. The engine models generated from the EMT use the minimum set of generalized coordinates to represent engine dynamics. This is achieved by employing a pre-selected set of relative coordinates. The resulting engine model is cast as a (minimum) set of ordinary differential equations in lieu of the differential-algebraic equations that result from using commercial multibody dynamics codes. The resulting models then enjoy greater computational efficiency.\\n In (Ma et al., 2000), we formulate the equations of motion for the engine and its major components. The objective of this paper is to review the numerical results obtained from sample engine designs and to discuss several tradeoffs between model accuracy and efficiency. Attention focuses on the trade-offs resulting from several bearing models, including linear and nonlinear spring-damper bearing models, and hydrodynamic bearing models based on the Reynolds equation. Results computed using these bearing models are critically compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/dsc-24514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2001/dsc-24514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
新发动机概念的设计需要一种工程工具,能够在发动机设计周期的一开始就快速估计噪声、振动和耐久性指标。在(Ma et al., 2000)中,我们提出了一个引擎建模模板(EMT)来支持引擎的前期设计。由EMT生成的发动机模型使用最小广义坐标集来表示发动机动力学。这是通过使用一组预先选择的相对坐标来实现的。所得到的发动机模型被转换为一组(最小)常微分方程,而不是使用商用多体动力学代码得到的微分代数方程。由此产生的模型具有更高的计算效率。在(Ma et al., 2000)中,我们制定了发动机及其主要部件的运动方程。本文的目的是回顾从发动机样品设计中获得的数值结果,并讨论模型精度和效率之间的几种权衡。重点关注几种轴承模型的权衡,包括线性和非线性弹簧-阻尼器轴承模型,以及基于雷诺方程的流体动力轴承模型。使用这些轴承模型计算的结果进行了严格的比较。
A First Principle Engine Model for Up-Front Design: Bearing Models and Example Results
The design of new engine concepts requires an engineering tool that can quickly estimate noise, vibration and durability metrics at the very onset of the engine design cycle. In (Ma et al., 2000), we presented an engine modeling template (EMT) to support up-front engine design. The engine models generated from the EMT use the minimum set of generalized coordinates to represent engine dynamics. This is achieved by employing a pre-selected set of relative coordinates. The resulting engine model is cast as a (minimum) set of ordinary differential equations in lieu of the differential-algebraic equations that result from using commercial multibody dynamics codes. The resulting models then enjoy greater computational efficiency.
In (Ma et al., 2000), we formulate the equations of motion for the engine and its major components. The objective of this paper is to review the numerical results obtained from sample engine designs and to discuss several tradeoffs between model accuracy and efficiency. Attention focuses on the trade-offs resulting from several bearing models, including linear and nonlinear spring-damper bearing models, and hydrodynamic bearing models based on the Reynolds equation. Results computed using these bearing models are critically compared.