Михаил Гаухман
{"title":"В поисках новой истории: историографические дискуссии начала XXI в. о метанарративе истории Украины","authors":"Михаил Гаухман","doi":"10.1353/imp.2022.0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:Mykhaylo Gaukhman surveys the history of development of a new historical canon in independent Ukraine from 1991 to summer 2022. It was June 2022 when a group of Ukrainian historians came up with the concept of a \"multifrontier\" as the best way to structure the narrative of Ukrainian history. Gaukhman characterizes this concept as metamodernist in the sense of its combining modernist nation-centrism with the postmodernist deconstruction of any rigid identity politics. The latter point seems to be shared by leading Ukrainian historians, who insist on prioritizing a commonality of values over a single normative cultural identity as the foundation of Ukrainian society. They criticize ethnoconfessional particularity as delegitimizing the modern Ukrainian state project that embraces a regionally and culturally diverse society. In this respect, a \"multifrontier\" perspective fits the bill by combining a multitude of situational arrangements with the singular and all-embracing mode of their interpretation. Following Serhii Plokhy, Gaukhman prefers to speak of a new metanarrative as a new national history that transcends the ethnonational historical canon and engages in dialogue with the global, transnational, multiethnic, and regional histories.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":"48 1","pages":"27 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2022.0060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:米哈伊洛·高科曼调查了1991年至2022年夏季独立的乌克兰新历史经典的发展历史。2022年6月,一群乌克兰历史学家提出了“多边疆”的概念,认为这是构建乌克兰历史叙事的最佳方式。高曼将这一概念定义为元现代主义,因为它将现代主义的民族中心主义与后现代主义对任何僵化的身份政治的解构结合在一起。后一点似乎得到了乌克兰著名历史学家的认同,他们坚持将价值观的共性置于单一规范的文化认同之上,作为乌克兰社会的基础。他们批评民族忏悔的特殊性使现代乌克兰国家计划失去了合法性,该计划包含了一个地区和文化多样化的社会。在这方面,“多边界”视角通过将大量情境安排与单一的、包罗万象的解释模式结合起来而符合要求。继Serhii Plokhy之后,高赫曼更倾向于将新的元叙事称为一种超越民族国家历史经典的新的民族历史,并与全球、跨国、多民族和地区历史进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
В поисках новой истории: историографические дискуссии начала XXI в. о метанарративе истории Украины
SUMMARY:Mykhaylo Gaukhman surveys the history of development of a new historical canon in independent Ukraine from 1991 to summer 2022. It was June 2022 when a group of Ukrainian historians came up with the concept of a "multifrontier" as the best way to structure the narrative of Ukrainian history. Gaukhman characterizes this concept as metamodernist in the sense of its combining modernist nation-centrism with the postmodernist deconstruction of any rigid identity politics. The latter point seems to be shared by leading Ukrainian historians, who insist on prioritizing a commonality of values over a single normative cultural identity as the foundation of Ukrainian society. They criticize ethnoconfessional particularity as delegitimizing the modern Ukrainian state project that embraces a regionally and culturally diverse society. In this respect, a "multifrontier" perspective fits the bill by combining a multitude of situational arrangements with the singular and all-embracing mode of their interpretation. Following Serhii Plokhy, Gaukhman prefers to speak of a new metanarrative as a new national history that transcends the ethnonational historical canon and engages in dialogue with the global, transnational, multiethnic, and regional histories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Propaganda, Immigration, and Monuments: Perspectives on Methods Used to Entrench Soviet Power in Estonia in the 1950s–1980s ed. by Meelis Saueauk and Meelis Maripuu (review) Toward a Queer Postnational Politics: Imagining the Nation Not Surviving Black Garden Aflame: The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in the Soviet and Russian Press by Artyom Tonoyan (review) На пути к постнациональной истории Евразии: деконструкция империи и денационализация группности From the Editors: Toward A Postnational History of Eurasia: Deconstructing Empires, Denationalizing Groupness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1