利用先进机器学习算法预测凝析油露点压力的比较分析

Thitaree Lertliangchai, B. Dindoruk, Ligang Lu, Xi Yang
{"title":"利用先进机器学习算法预测凝析油露点压力的比较分析","authors":"Thitaree Lertliangchai, B. Dindoruk, Ligang Lu, Xi Yang","doi":"10.2118/205997-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Dew point pressure (DPP) is a key variable that may be needed to predict the condensate to gas ratio behavior of a reservoir along with some production/completion related issues and calibrate/constrain the EOS models for integrated modeling. However, DPP is a challenging property in terms of its predictability. Recognizing the complexities, we present a state-of-the-art method for DPP prediction using advanced machine learning (ML) techniques. We compare the outcomes of our methodology with that of published empirical correlation-based approaches on two datasets with small sizes and different inputs. Our ML method noticeably outperforms the correlation-based predictors while also showing its flexibility and robustness even with small training datasets provided various classes of fluids are represented within the datasets. We have collected the condensate PVT data from public domain resources and GeoMark RFDBASE containing dew point pressure (the target variable), and the compositional data (mole percentage of each component), temperature, molecular weight (MW), MW and specific gravity (SG) of heptane plus as input variables. Using domain knowledge, before embarking the study, we have extensively checked the measurement quality and the outcomes using statistical techniques. We then apply advanced ML techniques to train predictive models with cross-validation to avoid overfitting the models to the small datasets. We compare our models against the best published DDP predictors with empirical correlation-based techniques. For fair comparisons, the correlation-based predictors are also trained using the underlying datasets. In order to improve the outcomes and using the generalized input data, pseudo-critical properties and artificial proxy features are also employed.","PeriodicalId":10928,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of the Prediction of Gas Condensate Dew Point Pressure Using Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Thitaree Lertliangchai, B. Dindoruk, Ligang Lu, Xi Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205997-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Dew point pressure (DPP) is a key variable that may be needed to predict the condensate to gas ratio behavior of a reservoir along with some production/completion related issues and calibrate/constrain the EOS models for integrated modeling. However, DPP is a challenging property in terms of its predictability. Recognizing the complexities, we present a state-of-the-art method for DPP prediction using advanced machine learning (ML) techniques. We compare the outcomes of our methodology with that of published empirical correlation-based approaches on two datasets with small sizes and different inputs. Our ML method noticeably outperforms the correlation-based predictors while also showing its flexibility and robustness even with small training datasets provided various classes of fluids are represented within the datasets. We have collected the condensate PVT data from public domain resources and GeoMark RFDBASE containing dew point pressure (the target variable), and the compositional data (mole percentage of each component), temperature, molecular weight (MW), MW and specific gravity (SG) of heptane plus as input variables. Using domain knowledge, before embarking the study, we have extensively checked the measurement quality and the outcomes using statistical techniques. We then apply advanced ML techniques to train predictive models with cross-validation to avoid overfitting the models to the small datasets. We compare our models against the best published DDP predictors with empirical correlation-based techniques. For fair comparisons, the correlation-based predictors are also trained using the underlying datasets. In order to improve the outcomes and using the generalized input data, pseudo-critical properties and artificial proxy features are also employed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205997-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 22, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205997-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

露点压力(DPP)是预测储层凝析气比行为以及一些生产/完井相关问题所需的关键变量,可以校准/约束EOS模型进行集成建模。认识到复杂性,我们提出了一种使用先进机器学习(ML)技术进行DPP预测的最先进方法。我们将我们的方法的结果与发表的基于经验相关性的方法的结果在两个具有小尺寸和不同输入的数据集上进行了比较。我们的机器学习方法明显优于基于相关性的预测器,同时也显示出它的灵活性和鲁棒性,即使是在小的训练数据集中,只要数据集中有各种类型的流体。我们从公共领域资源和GeoMark RFDBASE中收集了凝析液PVT数据,其中包含露点压力(目标变量),组成数据(每种组分的摩尔百分比),温度,正庚烷的分子量(MW), MW和比重(SG)作为输入变量。利用领域知识,在开始研究之前,我们使用统计技术广泛检查了测量质量和结果。然后,我们应用先进的机器学习技术来训练交叉验证的预测模型,以避免模型过度拟合到小数据集。我们将我们的模型与基于经验相关的技术发表的最佳DDP预测器进行比较。为了公平的比较,基于相关性的预测器也使用底层数据集进行训练。为了改善结果和利用广义输入数据,还使用了伪临界特性和人工代理特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Analysis of the Prediction of Gas Condensate Dew Point Pressure Using Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms
Dew point pressure (DPP) is a key variable that may be needed to predict the condensate to gas ratio behavior of a reservoir along with some production/completion related issues and calibrate/constrain the EOS models for integrated modeling. However, DPP is a challenging property in terms of its predictability. Recognizing the complexities, we present a state-of-the-art method for DPP prediction using advanced machine learning (ML) techniques. We compare the outcomes of our methodology with that of published empirical correlation-based approaches on two datasets with small sizes and different inputs. Our ML method noticeably outperforms the correlation-based predictors while also showing its flexibility and robustness even with small training datasets provided various classes of fluids are represented within the datasets. We have collected the condensate PVT data from public domain resources and GeoMark RFDBASE containing dew point pressure (the target variable), and the compositional data (mole percentage of each component), temperature, molecular weight (MW), MW and specific gravity (SG) of heptane plus as input variables. Using domain knowledge, before embarking the study, we have extensively checked the measurement quality and the outcomes using statistical techniques. We then apply advanced ML techniques to train predictive models with cross-validation to avoid overfitting the models to the small datasets. We compare our models against the best published DDP predictors with empirical correlation-based techniques. For fair comparisons, the correlation-based predictors are also trained using the underlying datasets. In order to improve the outcomes and using the generalized input data, pseudo-critical properties and artificial proxy features are also employed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of Wettability Alteration from Alkali/Nanoparticles/Polymer Flooding - Integrating Data of Imbibition, Contact Angle and Interfacial-Tension to Screen Injection Agents Benchmarking and Field-Testing of the Distributed Quasi-Newton Derivative-Free Optimization Method for Field Development Optimization Aplicability of an Innovative and Light Seismic Approach to Monitor SAGD Operations in Surmont: A Blind Test Four Simple Questions: Decision-Centered Risk and Project Management Gas Migration in Wellbores During Pressurized Mud Cap Drilling PMCD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1