利用人工智能估计密度测井和声波测井:以澳大利亚珀斯盆地为例

Muhammad Ridha Adhari, Muhammad Yusuf Kardawi
{"title":"利用人工智能估计密度测井和声波测井:以澳大利亚珀斯盆地为例","authors":"Muhammad Ridha Adhari, Muhammad Yusuf Kardawi","doi":"10.25299/jgeet.2022.7.4.10050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well understood that with  a large number of data, an excellent interpretation of the subsurface condition can be produced, and also our understandings of the subsurface conditions can be improved significantly. However, having abundant subsurface geological and petrophysical data sometimes may not be possible, mainly due to budget issues. This situation can generate issues during hydrocarbon exploration and/or development activities. \nIn this paper, the authors tried to apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to estimate outcomes values of particular wireline log data, using available petrophysic data. Two types of AI were selected and these are artificial neural network (ANN), and multiple linear regression (MLR). This research aims to advance our understanding of AI and its application in geology. There are three objectives of this study: (1) to estimate sonic log (DT) and density log (RhoB) using different types of AI (ANN and MLR); (2) to assess the best AI technique that can be used to estimate certain wireline log data; and (3) to compare the estimated wireline log values with the real, recorded values from the subsurface. \nFindings from this study show that ANN consistently provided a better accuracy percentage compared to MLR when estimating density log (RhoB). While using different set of data and technique, estimation of sonic log (DT) produced different accuracy level. Moreover, crossplot validation of the results show that the results from ANN analysis produced higher trendline reliability (R2) and correlation coefficient (R) than the results from MLR analysis. Comparison of the estimated RhoB and DT log data with the original recorded data shows minor mismatch. This is evident that AI technique can be a reliable solution to estimate particular outcomes of wireline log data, due to limited availability of the original recorded subsurface petrophysic data. It is expected that these findings would provide new insights into the application of AI in geology, and encourage the readers to explore and expand the many possibilities of the application of AI in geology.","PeriodicalId":31931,"journal":{"name":"JGEET Journal of Geoscience Engineering Environment and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of density log and sonic log using artificial intelligence: an example from the Perth Basin, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ridha Adhari, Muhammad Yusuf Kardawi\",\"doi\":\"10.25299/jgeet.2022.7.4.10050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well understood that with  a large number of data, an excellent interpretation of the subsurface condition can be produced, and also our understandings of the subsurface conditions can be improved significantly. However, having abundant subsurface geological and petrophysical data sometimes may not be possible, mainly due to budget issues. This situation can generate issues during hydrocarbon exploration and/or development activities. \\nIn this paper, the authors tried to apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to estimate outcomes values of particular wireline log data, using available petrophysic data. Two types of AI were selected and these are artificial neural network (ANN), and multiple linear regression (MLR). This research aims to advance our understanding of AI and its application in geology. There are three objectives of this study: (1) to estimate sonic log (DT) and density log (RhoB) using different types of AI (ANN and MLR); (2) to assess the best AI technique that can be used to estimate certain wireline log data; and (3) to compare the estimated wireline log values with the real, recorded values from the subsurface. \\nFindings from this study show that ANN consistently provided a better accuracy percentage compared to MLR when estimating density log (RhoB). While using different set of data and technique, estimation of sonic log (DT) produced different accuracy level. Moreover, crossplot validation of the results show that the results from ANN analysis produced higher trendline reliability (R2) and correlation coefficient (R) than the results from MLR analysis. Comparison of the estimated RhoB and DT log data with the original recorded data shows minor mismatch. This is evident that AI technique can be a reliable solution to estimate particular outcomes of wireline log data, due to limited availability of the original recorded subsurface petrophysic data. It is expected that these findings would provide new insights into the application of AI in geology, and encourage the readers to explore and expand the many possibilities of the application of AI in geology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JGEET Journal of Geoscience Engineering Environment and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JGEET Journal of Geoscience Engineering Environment and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25299/jgeet.2022.7.4.10050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGEET Journal of Geoscience Engineering Environment and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25299/jgeet.2022.7.4.10050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,有了大量的数据,就可以很好地解释地下状况,也可以大大提高我们对地下状况的认识。然而,由于预算问题,有时可能无法获得丰富的地下地质和岩石物理数据。这种情况可能会在油气勘探和/或开发活动中产生问题。在本文中,作者尝试应用人工智能(AI)技术,利用现有的岩石物理数据来估计特定电缆测井数据的结果值。本文选择了人工神经网络(ANN)和多元线性回归(MLR)两种类型的人工智能。本研究旨在加深我们对人工智能及其在地质学中的应用的认识。本研究有三个目标:(1)使用不同类型的人工智能(ANN和MLR)估计声波对数(DT)和密度对数(RhoB);(2)评估可用于估算某些电缆测井数据的最佳人工智能技术;(3)将估计的电缆测井值与地下的实际记录值进行比较。本研究结果表明,在估计密度对数(RhoB)时,与MLR相比,ANN始终提供更好的准确率。采用不同的数据和技术,声波测井估计的精度水平也不同。此外,交叉图验证结果表明,人工神经网络分析结果的趋势线信度(R2)和相关系数(R)高于MLR分析结果。估计的RhoB和DT测井数据与原始记录数据的比较显示出轻微的不匹配。显然,由于原始记录的地下岩石物理数据的可用性有限,人工智能技术可以作为一种可靠的解决方案来估计电缆测井数据的特定结果。期望这些发现能够为人工智能在地质学中的应用提供新的见解,并鼓励读者探索和拓展人工智能在地质学中的应用的多种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of density log and sonic log using artificial intelligence: an example from the Perth Basin, Australia
It is well understood that with  a large number of data, an excellent interpretation of the subsurface condition can be produced, and also our understandings of the subsurface conditions can be improved significantly. However, having abundant subsurface geological and petrophysical data sometimes may not be possible, mainly due to budget issues. This situation can generate issues during hydrocarbon exploration and/or development activities. In this paper, the authors tried to apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to estimate outcomes values of particular wireline log data, using available petrophysic data. Two types of AI were selected and these are artificial neural network (ANN), and multiple linear regression (MLR). This research aims to advance our understanding of AI and its application in geology. There are three objectives of this study: (1) to estimate sonic log (DT) and density log (RhoB) using different types of AI (ANN and MLR); (2) to assess the best AI technique that can be used to estimate certain wireline log data; and (3) to compare the estimated wireline log values with the real, recorded values from the subsurface. Findings from this study show that ANN consistently provided a better accuracy percentage compared to MLR when estimating density log (RhoB). While using different set of data and technique, estimation of sonic log (DT) produced different accuracy level. Moreover, crossplot validation of the results show that the results from ANN analysis produced higher trendline reliability (R2) and correlation coefficient (R) than the results from MLR analysis. Comparison of the estimated RhoB and DT log data with the original recorded data shows minor mismatch. This is evident that AI technique can be a reliable solution to estimate particular outcomes of wireline log data, due to limited availability of the original recorded subsurface petrophysic data. It is expected that these findings would provide new insights into the application of AI in geology, and encourage the readers to explore and expand the many possibilities of the application of AI in geology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geomorphology and Geology Studies Using Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Data In the Watershed Area of Kampar Regency, Riau Province Geological Analysis for Slope Stability Using the Rock Structure Rating (RSR) Method and Atterberg Limit at Riau - West Sumatra Cross road Km 165 Harau Subdistrict, Lima puluh Kota Regency, West Sumatra Province Economic And Sensitivity Analysis Stimulation Of Coiled Tubing And Bullhead Combination On A Horizontal Well The Effect of Vermicompost Fertilizer and Mutiara Npk 16:16:16 on the Growth and Production of Pakcoy Plant (Brassica Rapa L.) The Effect of Sales Growth, Dividend Policy and Return on Assets on Debt Policy in Property and Real Estate Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013 - 2017
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1