{"title":"缝合痔切除术的初步经验:一份本地报告","authors":"K. K. Yau, C. Chung, E. Chan, Michael Li","doi":"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00125.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \n \nStapled haemorrhoidectomy is a new modality in the surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease and rectal mucosal prolapse. This paper aims at reporting the initial experience in a local institution. \n \n \n \nMethod: \n \nFrom July 2000 to March 2001, a total of 17 patients underwent stapled haemorrhoidectomy, including 16 patients with third-degree haemorrhoids and one patient with rectal mucosal prolapse. With the aid of a specially designed assessment form, data were collected during the inpatient period and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation. \n \n \n \nResults: \n \nThe median operation time was 18 min (range 5–45 min) with a median blood loss of 10 mL (range 0–100 mL). Only three patients required pethidine injection during the postoperative period; other patients could be managed with simple oral analgesic. Thirteen patients (76%) could be discharged on the second day after the operation (range 1–7 patients), and the median time off work was 9 days (range 1–21 days). Complications encountered were minor, and symptom control and functional outcome appeared superior to excisional haemorrhoidectomy. \n \n \n \nConclusion: \n \nStapled haemorrhoidectomy is safe. The improved postoperative pain and the reduced time off work are evident; however, long-term outcomes still need further evaluation. \n \n \n \nChinese Abstract \n \n \n \n \nFigure Chinese Abstract.","PeriodicalId":7943,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","volume":"18 1","pages":"8-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial experience with stapled haemorrhoidectomy: A local report\",\"authors\":\"K. K. Yau, C. Chung, E. Chan, Michael Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00125.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\n \\nStapled haemorrhoidectomy is a new modality in the surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease and rectal mucosal prolapse. This paper aims at reporting the initial experience in a local institution. \\n \\n \\n \\nMethod: \\n \\nFrom July 2000 to March 2001, a total of 17 patients underwent stapled haemorrhoidectomy, including 16 patients with third-degree haemorrhoids and one patient with rectal mucosal prolapse. With the aid of a specially designed assessment form, data were collected during the inpatient period and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation. \\n \\n \\n \\nResults: \\n \\nThe median operation time was 18 min (range 5–45 min) with a median blood loss of 10 mL (range 0–100 mL). Only three patients required pethidine injection during the postoperative period; other patients could be managed with simple oral analgesic. Thirteen patients (76%) could be discharged on the second day after the operation (range 1–7 patients), and the median time off work was 9 days (range 1–21 days). Complications encountered were minor, and symptom control and functional outcome appeared superior to excisional haemorrhoidectomy. \\n \\n \\n \\nConclusion: \\n \\nStapled haemorrhoidectomy is safe. The improved postoperative pain and the reduced time off work are evident; however, long-term outcomes still need further evaluation. \\n \\n \\n \\nChinese Abstract \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFigure Chinese Abstract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"8-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00125.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00125.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Initial experience with stapled haemorrhoidectomy: A local report
Objective:
Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is a new modality in the surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease and rectal mucosal prolapse. This paper aims at reporting the initial experience in a local institution.
Method:
From July 2000 to March 2001, a total of 17 patients underwent stapled haemorrhoidectomy, including 16 patients with third-degree haemorrhoids and one patient with rectal mucosal prolapse. With the aid of a specially designed assessment form, data were collected during the inpatient period and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the operation.
Results:
The median operation time was 18 min (range 5–45 min) with a median blood loss of 10 mL (range 0–100 mL). Only three patients required pethidine injection during the postoperative period; other patients could be managed with simple oral analgesic. Thirteen patients (76%) could be discharged on the second day after the operation (range 1–7 patients), and the median time off work was 9 days (range 1–21 days). Complications encountered were minor, and symptom control and functional outcome appeared superior to excisional haemorrhoidectomy.
Conclusion:
Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is safe. The improved postoperative pain and the reduced time off work are evident; however, long-term outcomes still need further evaluation.
Chinese Abstract
Figure Chinese Abstract.