区域平均O3和SO2浓度对ADOM干沉积速度参数化的敏感性

J. Padro, K.J. Puckett, D.N. Woolridge
{"title":"区域平均O3和SO2浓度对ADOM干沉积速度参数化的敏感性","authors":"J. Padro,&nbsp;K.J. Puckett,&nbsp;D.N. Woolridge","doi":"10.1016/0960-1686(93)90054-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The influence of three different surface resistance formulations upon the resulting grid-averaged dry deposition velocity and the concentrations of O<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> calculated using the Acid Deposition and Oxidant Model (ADOM) has been investigated. Four ADOM simulations of the O<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were compared with each other and the observations. The results show that two of the resistance formulations can decrease the original ADOM area-averaged dry deposition velocity by as much as 50% and increase the corresponding concentration by as much as 37% for O<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>. However, all versions of the ADOM considerably underpredict the concentrations, implying weaknesses in ADOM that are not related to dry deposition. Wet surfaces appeared to have little influence on the estimated dry deposition velocity and concentration of O<sub>3</sub> but had a strong influence on those for SO<sub>2</sub>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100139,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics","volume":"27 14","pages":"Pages 2239-2242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90054-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The sensitivity of regionally averaged O3 and SO2 concentrations to ADOM dry deposition velocity parameterizations\",\"authors\":\"J. Padro,&nbsp;K.J. Puckett,&nbsp;D.N. Woolridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0960-1686(93)90054-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The influence of three different surface resistance formulations upon the resulting grid-averaged dry deposition velocity and the concentrations of O<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> calculated using the Acid Deposition and Oxidant Model (ADOM) has been investigated. Four ADOM simulations of the O<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were compared with each other and the observations. The results show that two of the resistance formulations can decrease the original ADOM area-averaged dry deposition velocity by as much as 50% and increase the corresponding concentration by as much as 37% for O<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>. However, all versions of the ADOM considerably underpredict the concentrations, implying weaknesses in ADOM that are not related to dry deposition. Wet surfaces appeared to have little influence on the estimated dry deposition velocity and concentration of O<sub>3</sub> but had a strong influence on those for SO<sub>2</sub>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics\",\"volume\":\"27 14\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2239-2242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90054-3\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0960168693900543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0960168693900543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

研究了三种不同的表面电阻配方对网格平均干沉积速度的影响以及使用酸沉积和氧化剂模型(ADOM)计算的O3和SO2浓度。将4种ADOM模拟的O3和SO2浓度与观测值进行了比较。结果表明,两种电阻配方可使原始ADOM面积平均干沉积速度降低50%,使O3和SO2的浓度提高37%。然而,ADOM的所有版本都大大低估了浓度,这意味着ADOM的弱点与干沉积无关。湿表面对O3干沉降速率和浓度的影响不大,但对SO2干沉降速率和浓度的影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The sensitivity of regionally averaged O3 and SO2 concentrations to ADOM dry deposition velocity parameterizations

The influence of three different surface resistance formulations upon the resulting grid-averaged dry deposition velocity and the concentrations of O3 and SO2 calculated using the Acid Deposition and Oxidant Model (ADOM) has been investigated. Four ADOM simulations of the O3 and SO2 concentrations were compared with each other and the observations. The results show that two of the resistance formulations can decrease the original ADOM area-averaged dry deposition velocity by as much as 50% and increase the corresponding concentration by as much as 37% for O3 and SO2. However, all versions of the ADOM considerably underpredict the concentrations, implying weaknesses in ADOM that are not related to dry deposition. Wet surfaces appeared to have little influence on the estimated dry deposition velocity and concentration of O3 but had a strong influence on those for SO2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction Calendar Errata Arctic aerosols in Greenland Size distributions of atmospheric trace elements at dye 3, Greenland—II. Sources and transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1