绩效评估中的评价者连接与偏差检测

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15366367.2021.1942672
Stefanie A. Wind
{"title":"绩效评估中的评价者连接与偏差检测","authors":"Stefanie A. Wind","doi":"10.1080/15366367.2021.1942672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In many performance assessments, one or two raters from the complete rater pool scores each performance, resulting in a sparse rating design, where there are limited observations of each rater relative to the complete sample of students. Although sparse rating designs can be constructed to facilitate estimation of student achievement, the relatively limited observations of each rater can pose challenges for identifying raters who may exhibit scoring idiosyncrasies specific to individual or subgroups of examinees, such as differential rater functioning (DRF; i.e., rater bias). In particular, when raters who exhibit DRF are directly connected to other raters who exhibit the same type of DRF, there is limited information with which to detect this effect. On the other hand, if raters who exhibit DRF are connected to raters who do not exhibit DRF, this effect may be more readily detected. In this study, a simulation is used to systematically examine the degree to which the nature of connections among raters who exhibit common DRF patterns in sparse rating designs impacts the sensitivity of DRF indices. The use of additional “monitoring ratings” and variable rater assignment to student performances are considered as strategies to improve DRF detection in sparse designs. The results indicate that the nature of connections among DRF raters has a substantial impact on the sensitivity of DRF indices, and that monitoring ratings and variable rater assignment to student performances can improve DRF detection.","PeriodicalId":46596,"journal":{"name":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","volume":"26 1","pages":"91 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rater Connections and the Detection of Bias in Performance Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie A. Wind\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15366367.2021.1942672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In many performance assessments, one or two raters from the complete rater pool scores each performance, resulting in a sparse rating design, where there are limited observations of each rater relative to the complete sample of students. Although sparse rating designs can be constructed to facilitate estimation of student achievement, the relatively limited observations of each rater can pose challenges for identifying raters who may exhibit scoring idiosyncrasies specific to individual or subgroups of examinees, such as differential rater functioning (DRF; i.e., rater bias). In particular, when raters who exhibit DRF are directly connected to other raters who exhibit the same type of DRF, there is limited information with which to detect this effect. On the other hand, if raters who exhibit DRF are connected to raters who do not exhibit DRF, this effect may be more readily detected. In this study, a simulation is used to systematically examine the degree to which the nature of connections among raters who exhibit common DRF patterns in sparse rating designs impacts the sensitivity of DRF indices. The use of additional “monitoring ratings” and variable rater assignment to student performances are considered as strategies to improve DRF detection in sparse designs. The results indicate that the nature of connections among DRF raters has a substantial impact on the sensitivity of DRF indices, and that monitoring ratings and variable rater assignment to student performances can improve DRF detection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2021.1942672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2021.1942672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在许多绩效评估中,从完整的评分者池中选出一个或两个评分者对每个绩效进行评分,导致了稀疏的评分设计,其中每个评分者相对于完整的学生样本的观察结果有限。尽管可以构建稀疏评分设计来促进对学生成绩的估计,但对每个评分员的相对有限的观察可能会对识别可能表现出特定于个人或考生亚组的评分特质的评分员构成挑战,例如差异评分功能(DRF;也就是,评分偏差)。特别是,当表现出DRF的评分者与表现出相同类型DRF的其他评分者直接联系时,用于检测这种影响的信息有限。另一方面,如果表现出DRF的评分者与没有表现出DRF的评分者有联系,这种影响可能更容易被发现。在本研究中,模拟用于系统地检查在稀疏评级设计中表现出常见DRF模式的评分者之间的连接性质对DRF指数敏感性的影响程度。在稀疏设计中,使用额外的“监控评分”和对学生成绩分配可变评分者被认为是改进DRF检测的策略。结果表明,DRF评分者之间的联系性质对DRF指标的敏感性有实质性影响,监测评分和对学生成绩的可变评分分配可以提高DRF检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rater Connections and the Detection of Bias in Performance Assessment
ABSTRACT In many performance assessments, one or two raters from the complete rater pool scores each performance, resulting in a sparse rating design, where there are limited observations of each rater relative to the complete sample of students. Although sparse rating designs can be constructed to facilitate estimation of student achievement, the relatively limited observations of each rater can pose challenges for identifying raters who may exhibit scoring idiosyncrasies specific to individual or subgroups of examinees, such as differential rater functioning (DRF; i.e., rater bias). In particular, when raters who exhibit DRF are directly connected to other raters who exhibit the same type of DRF, there is limited information with which to detect this effect. On the other hand, if raters who exhibit DRF are connected to raters who do not exhibit DRF, this effect may be more readily detected. In this study, a simulation is used to systematically examine the degree to which the nature of connections among raters who exhibit common DRF patterns in sparse rating designs impacts the sensitivity of DRF indices. The use of additional “monitoring ratings” and variable rater assignment to student performances are considered as strategies to improve DRF detection in sparse designs. The results indicate that the nature of connections among DRF raters has a substantial impact on the sensitivity of DRF indices, and that monitoring ratings and variable rater assignment to student performances can improve DRF detection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
Measurement-Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
A Latent Trait Approach to the Measurement of Physical Fitness Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Fake News Classification The Use of Multidimensional Item Response Theory Estimations in Controlling Differential Item Functioning Opinion Instability and Measurement Errors: A G-Theory Analysis of College Students Predicting the Risk of Diabetes and Heart Disease with Machine Learning Classifiers: The Mediation Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1