接受瑞芬太尼与舒芬太尼治疗的儿童术后阿片类药物使用情况

Tara M. Doherty, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Robert E. Christensen, Shobha Malviya
{"title":"接受瑞芬太尼与舒芬太尼治疗的儿童术后阿片类药物使用情况","authors":"Tara M. Doherty,&nbsp;Terri Voepel-Lewis,&nbsp;Robert E. Christensen,&nbsp;Shobha Malviya","doi":"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies have found a 30–50% increase in postoperative opioid demand following intraoperative use of remifentanil infusion, suggesting development of acute opioid tolerance. This study was undertaken to compare postoperative opioid requirements in children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions during spine fusion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A secondary review of data from children 8–18 years of age, who had undergone spine fusion was conducted. Patients who had received remifentanil infusions were matched by age, procedure, and duration of anaesthesia to those who received sufentanil infusions. Data included patient demographics, total intraoperative and postoperative opioids, and self-reported pain scores. Postoperative pain was managed with morphine patient controlled analgesia, and acetaminophen and diazepam as needed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-four children (13.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3 years) were included. Demographic and procedural data were similar between groups. There were no differences between remifentanil or sufentanil groups in high pain scores (5.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.4 vs. 5.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.6, respectively) or cumulative morphine requirements (1.02<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.32<!--> <!-->mg/kg vs. 1.07<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.48<!--> <!-->mg/kg) during the first 24<!--> <!-->h after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found no difference in opioid consumption between children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions. Findings suggest that these short-acting potent opioids similarly affect morphine requirements following spine fusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100023,"journal":{"name":"Acute Pain","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 107-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative opioid usage in children receiving Remifentanil vs. sufentanil\",\"authors\":\"Tara M. Doherty,&nbsp;Terri Voepel-Lewis,&nbsp;Robert E. Christensen,&nbsp;Shobha Malviya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies have found a 30–50% increase in postoperative opioid demand following intraoperative use of remifentanil infusion, suggesting development of acute opioid tolerance. This study was undertaken to compare postoperative opioid requirements in children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions during spine fusion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A secondary review of data from children 8–18 years of age, who had undergone spine fusion was conducted. Patients who had received remifentanil infusions were matched by age, procedure, and duration of anaesthesia to those who received sufentanil infusions. Data included patient demographics, total intraoperative and postoperative opioids, and self-reported pain scores. Postoperative pain was managed with morphine patient controlled analgesia, and acetaminophen and diazepam as needed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-four children (13.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3 years) were included. Demographic and procedural data were similar between groups. There were no differences between remifentanil or sufentanil groups in high pain scores (5.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.4 vs. 5.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.6, respectively) or cumulative morphine requirements (1.02<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.32<!--> <!-->mg/kg vs. 1.07<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.48<!--> <!-->mg/kg) during the first 24<!--> <!-->h after surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found no difference in opioid consumption between children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions. Findings suggest that these short-acting potent opioids similarly affect morphine requirements following spine fusion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Pain\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 107-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366007109000497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366007109000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究发现,术中使用瑞芬太尼输注后,术后阿片类药物需求增加30-50%,提示急性阿片类药物耐受性的发展。本研究旨在比较脊柱融合术中接受瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼输注的儿童术后阿片类药物需求。方法对8-18岁行脊柱融合术儿童的资料进行二次回顾。接受瑞芬太尼输注的患者与接受舒芬太尼输注的患者按年龄、手术和麻醉时间进行匹配。数据包括患者人口统计数据、术中和术后阿片类药物总量以及自我报告的疼痛评分。术后疼痛用吗啡控制镇痛,必要时用对乙酰氨基酚和地西泮。结果共纳入44例儿童(13.5±3岁)。组间人口学和程序数据相似。瑞芬太尼组和舒芬太尼组在术后24小时的高疼痛评分(分别为5.3±2.4比5.7±2.6)或吗啡累积需用量(1.02±0.32 mg/kg比1.07±0.48 mg/kg)方面无差异。结论本研究发现接受瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼输注的儿童在阿片类药物的消耗方面没有差异。研究结果表明,这些短效强效阿片类药物同样影响脊柱融合后的吗啡需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative opioid usage in children receiving Remifentanil vs. sufentanil

Background

Studies have found a 30–50% increase in postoperative opioid demand following intraoperative use of remifentanil infusion, suggesting development of acute opioid tolerance. This study was undertaken to compare postoperative opioid requirements in children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions during spine fusion.

Methods

A secondary review of data from children 8–18 years of age, who had undergone spine fusion was conducted. Patients who had received remifentanil infusions were matched by age, procedure, and duration of anaesthesia to those who received sufentanil infusions. Data included patient demographics, total intraoperative and postoperative opioids, and self-reported pain scores. Postoperative pain was managed with morphine patient controlled analgesia, and acetaminophen and diazepam as needed.

Results

Forty-four children (13.5 ± 3 years) were included. Demographic and procedural data were similar between groups. There were no differences between remifentanil or sufentanil groups in high pain scores (5.3 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.6, respectively) or cumulative morphine requirements (1.02 ± 0.32 mg/kg vs. 1.07 ± 0.48 mg/kg) during the first 24 h after surgery.

Conclusion

This study found no difference in opioid consumption between children who received remifentanil versus sufentanil infusions. Findings suggest that these short-acting potent opioids similarly affect morphine requirements following spine fusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conference Calendar Editorial Board Announcement Anaesthesiologist-associated risk factors for inadequate postoperative pain management Continuing use of droperidol in patient-controlled analgesia with morphine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1