地理教学内容的感知难度是决定误解起源的一个因素

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Geografie-Sbornik CGS Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.37040/geografie.2022.003
Tereza Kocová, Miroslav Marada
{"title":"地理教学内容的感知难度是决定误解起源的一个因素","authors":"Tereza Kocová, Miroslav Marada","doi":"10.37040/geografie.2022.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study deals with the pupils’ and teachers’ perception of the geography content matter difficulty as a factor determining the origin of misconceptions. We assumed that the incidence of misconceptions will be higher with an increasing perceived difficulty of the content. The first part of the study examines the perceived difficulty of geographical topics by pupils and teachers. The second part is a didactic test verifying the occurrence of misconceptions on topics selected on the basis of perceived difficulty. The results indicate that students perceive the difficulty more “realistically” in line with the assumption that they will solve easy questions with greater success. Teachers’ estimates correspond to the occurrence of expected misconceptions. The study also noted differences in the perception of difficulty in the topics of physical and social geography. The present study underlines the importance of constructivist approaches in working with misconceptions in school.","PeriodicalId":35714,"journal":{"name":"Geografie-Sbornik CGS","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The perceived difficulty of content matter in geography tuition as a factor determining the origin of misconceptions\",\"authors\":\"Tereza Kocová, Miroslav Marada\",\"doi\":\"10.37040/geografie.2022.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study deals with the pupils’ and teachers’ perception of the geography content matter difficulty as a factor determining the origin of misconceptions. We assumed that the incidence of misconceptions will be higher with an increasing perceived difficulty of the content. The first part of the study examines the perceived difficulty of geographical topics by pupils and teachers. The second part is a didactic test verifying the occurrence of misconceptions on topics selected on the basis of perceived difficulty. The results indicate that students perceive the difficulty more “realistically” in line with the assumption that they will solve easy questions with greater success. Teachers’ estimates correspond to the occurrence of expected misconceptions. The study also noted differences in the perception of difficulty in the topics of physical and social geography. The present study underlines the importance of constructivist approaches in working with misconceptions in school.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geografie-Sbornik CGS\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geografie-Sbornik CGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2022.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografie-Sbornik CGS","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie.2022.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究探讨了学生和教师对地理内容难度的认知是决定误解起源的一个因素。我们假设,随着内容难度的增加,误解的发生率会更高。研究的第一部分考察了学生和教师对地理主题的认知难度。第二部分是一个教学测试,验证基于感知难度选择的主题的误解发生情况。结果表明,学生们对困难的感知更加“现实”,这与他们将更成功地解决简单问题的假设是一致的。教师的估计与预期误解的发生相对应。该研究还指出,在自然地理和社会地理主题中,人们对难度的感知存在差异。本研究强调了建构主义方法在解决学校误解方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The perceived difficulty of content matter in geography tuition as a factor determining the origin of misconceptions
The study deals with the pupils’ and teachers’ perception of the geography content matter difficulty as a factor determining the origin of misconceptions. We assumed that the incidence of misconceptions will be higher with an increasing perceived difficulty of the content. The first part of the study examines the perceived difficulty of geographical topics by pupils and teachers. The second part is a didactic test verifying the occurrence of misconceptions on topics selected on the basis of perceived difficulty. The results indicate that students perceive the difficulty more “realistically” in line with the assumption that they will solve easy questions with greater success. Teachers’ estimates correspond to the occurrence of expected misconceptions. The study also noted differences in the perception of difficulty in the topics of physical and social geography. The present study underlines the importance of constructivist approaches in working with misconceptions in school.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geografie-Sbornik CGS
Geografie-Sbornik CGS Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
In the garden with Lefebvre and Foucault: The cultivation of taste in spaces of food The admission of Ukrainian refugees from the perspective of municipalities in Czechia Electoral support in peripheral post-socialist regions as a product of nostalgia and grievances: The example of the Bruntál district The geography of discontent and resentment: A spatiotemporal analysis of populist radical right voting in Czechia between 1992 and 2021 Traditional and novel approaches to studying the human thermal environment in urban areas: A critical review of the current state of the art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1