阿巴拉契亚煤矿区原生树木的生存与草本植物的建立

D. M. Evans
{"title":"阿巴拉契亚煤矿区原生树木的生存与草本植物的建立","authors":"D. M. Evans","doi":"10.21000/JASMR13020032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On a surface coal mine in southern West Virginia, the forestry reclamation approach was applied while quantifying the effects of substrate type and seeding prescription on survival and growth of native tree species and herbaceous vegetation. Four substrates were used: weathered sandstone (brown), unweathered sandstone/shale mix (gray), mixture of weathered and unweathered rock (mixed), and a mixture of the soil solum and unconsolidated soil parent material (soil). Each substrate treatment was split into two subplots; one seeded with a tree-compatible herbaceous seed mixture and one unseeded. Trees were planted in March 2012, measured for initial height in June 2012, and measured for height and survival in late October 2012. Herbaceous groundcover and species richness were measured during the growing season. After one growing season, mean percent survival and growth of planted trees differed among tree species and seeding treatments. There were no differences in tree survival among substrate treatments. Of planted tree species, survival was higher for hawthorn and black cherry (~85%) than for most other species and lowest for Eastern white pines (25.3%) and shagbark hickory (24.3%). Unseeded treatments had higher tree survival (70.4%) than seeded treatments (56.4%). Of the trees which survived the first growing season, black cherry, red oak, sugar maple, and white oak showed differences in height growth related to experimental treatments. Black cherry and red oak trees grew more in the unseeded treatment, compared to the seeded treatment. White oaks grew the most in the brown sandstone treatment. Sugar maples grew the most in the seeded mixed treatment. Gray and soil substrate treatments had the highest total herbaceous richness and the soil treatment had the highest volunteer richness. Seeded treatments had less bare ground and higher mean herbaceous species richness than unseeded subplots. Leaving the landscape unseeded facilitated tree establishment, but the impact of seeding on the future understory community remains unclear. Soil appears superior to rock spoils for re-establishing a diverse understory. We expect that the influence of substrate and seeding treatments will become clearer after additional growing seasons.","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"36 1","pages":"32-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NATIVE TREE SURVIVAL AND HERBACEOUS ESTABLISHMENT ON AN EXPERIMENTALLY RECLAIMED APPALACHIAN COAL MINE 1\",\"authors\":\"D. M. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.21000/JASMR13020032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On a surface coal mine in southern West Virginia, the forestry reclamation approach was applied while quantifying the effects of substrate type and seeding prescription on survival and growth of native tree species and herbaceous vegetation. Four substrates were used: weathered sandstone (brown), unweathered sandstone/shale mix (gray), mixture of weathered and unweathered rock (mixed), and a mixture of the soil solum and unconsolidated soil parent material (soil). Each substrate treatment was split into two subplots; one seeded with a tree-compatible herbaceous seed mixture and one unseeded. Trees were planted in March 2012, measured for initial height in June 2012, and measured for height and survival in late October 2012. Herbaceous groundcover and species richness were measured during the growing season. After one growing season, mean percent survival and growth of planted trees differed among tree species and seeding treatments. There were no differences in tree survival among substrate treatments. Of planted tree species, survival was higher for hawthorn and black cherry (~85%) than for most other species and lowest for Eastern white pines (25.3%) and shagbark hickory (24.3%). Unseeded treatments had higher tree survival (70.4%) than seeded treatments (56.4%). Of the trees which survived the first growing season, black cherry, red oak, sugar maple, and white oak showed differences in height growth related to experimental treatments. Black cherry and red oak trees grew more in the unseeded treatment, compared to the seeded treatment. White oaks grew the most in the brown sandstone treatment. Sugar maples grew the most in the seeded mixed treatment. Gray and soil substrate treatments had the highest total herbaceous richness and the soil treatment had the highest volunteer richness. Seeded treatments had less bare ground and higher mean herbaceous species richness than unseeded subplots. Leaving the landscape unseeded facilitated tree establishment, but the impact of seeding on the future understory community remains unclear. Soil appears superior to rock spoils for re-establishing a diverse understory. We expect that the influence of substrate and seeding treatments will become clearer after additional growing seasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"32-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR13020032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR13020032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在西弗吉尼亚州南部的一个露天煤矿上,采用林业复垦方法,量化了基质类型和播种处方对本地树种和草本植被生存和生长的影响。使用了四种基质:风化砂岩(棕色),未风化砂岩/页岩混合物(灰色),风化和未风化岩石的混合物(混合),以及土壤溶胶和松散土壤母质(土壤)的混合物。每个基质处理被分成两个子图;一种用与树相容的草本种子混合物播种,另一种不播种。2012年3月种植,6月测初高,10月下旬测高和成活率。在生长季节测定草本地被和物种丰富度。一个生长季后,不同树种和不同种子处理的平均成活率和生长率存在差异。基质处理对树木存活率无显著影响。在人工林树种中,山楂和黑樱桃的成活率最高(约85%),东部白松(25.3%)和山胡桃(24.3%)的成活率最低。无籽处理的树成活率(70.4%)高于有籽处理(56.4%)。在第一个生长季存活的树木中,黑樱桃、红橡树、糖枫和白橡树的高度生长表现出与试验处理有关的差异。黑樱桃和红橡树在未播种处理下比在播种处理下生长得更好。白橡树在棕色砂岩处理下生长最多。混合种子处理的糖槭生长最好。灰色和土壤基质处理的草本植物总丰富度最高,土壤处理的志愿丰富度最高。与未播种亚样区相比,播种处理的裸地较少,平均草本物种丰富度较高。不播种有利于树木的生长,但播种对未来林下群落的影响尚不清楚。在重建多样的林下植被方面,土壤似乎优于岩石。我们预计基质和种子处理的影响将在额外的生长季节后变得更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NATIVE TREE SURVIVAL AND HERBACEOUS ESTABLISHMENT ON AN EXPERIMENTALLY RECLAIMED APPALACHIAN COAL MINE 1
On a surface coal mine in southern West Virginia, the forestry reclamation approach was applied while quantifying the effects of substrate type and seeding prescription on survival and growth of native tree species and herbaceous vegetation. Four substrates were used: weathered sandstone (brown), unweathered sandstone/shale mix (gray), mixture of weathered and unweathered rock (mixed), and a mixture of the soil solum and unconsolidated soil parent material (soil). Each substrate treatment was split into two subplots; one seeded with a tree-compatible herbaceous seed mixture and one unseeded. Trees were planted in March 2012, measured for initial height in June 2012, and measured for height and survival in late October 2012. Herbaceous groundcover and species richness were measured during the growing season. After one growing season, mean percent survival and growth of planted trees differed among tree species and seeding treatments. There were no differences in tree survival among substrate treatments. Of planted tree species, survival was higher for hawthorn and black cherry (~85%) than for most other species and lowest for Eastern white pines (25.3%) and shagbark hickory (24.3%). Unseeded treatments had higher tree survival (70.4%) than seeded treatments (56.4%). Of the trees which survived the first growing season, black cherry, red oak, sugar maple, and white oak showed differences in height growth related to experimental treatments. Black cherry and red oak trees grew more in the unseeded treatment, compared to the seeded treatment. White oaks grew the most in the brown sandstone treatment. Sugar maples grew the most in the seeded mixed treatment. Gray and soil substrate treatments had the highest total herbaceous richness and the soil treatment had the highest volunteer richness. Seeded treatments had less bare ground and higher mean herbaceous species richness than unseeded subplots. Leaving the landscape unseeded facilitated tree establishment, but the impact of seeding on the future understory community remains unclear. Soil appears superior to rock spoils for re-establishing a diverse understory. We expect that the influence of substrate and seeding treatments will become clearer after additional growing seasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System to Evaluate Prime Farmland Reclamation Success Based on Spatial Soil Properties PENNSYLVANIA’S ABANDONED MINE LAND (AML) EMERGENCY PROGRAM THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEEPAGE ANALYSIS OF A COAL REFUSE PILE RECLAMATION PENNSYLVANIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL GOOD SAMARITAN PROGRAM DIMENSIONS IN POST-INDUSTRIAL LAND TRANSFORMATION IN PLANNING AND DESIGN: A PORTUGESE CASE STUDY CONCERNING PUBLIC PERCEPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1