{"title":"云计算中的价格和质量竞争","authors":"Cinar Kilcioglu, Justin M. Rao","doi":"10.1145/2872427.2883043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The public cloud \"infrastructure as a service\" market possesses unique features that make it difficult to predict long-run economic behavior. On the one hand, major providers buy their hardware from the same manufacturers, operate in similar locations and offer a similar menu of products. On the other hand, the competitors use different proprietary \"fabric\" to manage virtualization, resource allocation and data transfer. The menus offered by each provider involve a discrete number of choices (virtual machine sizes) and allow providers to locate in different parts of the price-quality space. We document this differentiation empirically by running benchmarking tests. This allows us to calibrate a model of firm technology. Firm technology is an input into our theoretical model of price-quality competition. The monopoly case highlights the importance of competition in blocking \"bad equilibrium\" where performance is intentionally slowed down or options are unduly limited. In duopoly, price competition is fierce, but prices do not converge to the same level because of price-quality differentiation. The model helps explain market trends, such the healthy operating profit margin recently reported by Amazon Web Services. Our empirically calibrated model helps not only explain price cutting behavior but also how providers can manage a profit despite predictions that the market \"should be\" totally commoditized.","PeriodicalId":20455,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition on Price and Quality in Cloud Computing\",\"authors\":\"Cinar Kilcioglu, Justin M. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2872427.2883043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The public cloud \\\"infrastructure as a service\\\" market possesses unique features that make it difficult to predict long-run economic behavior. On the one hand, major providers buy their hardware from the same manufacturers, operate in similar locations and offer a similar menu of products. On the other hand, the competitors use different proprietary \\\"fabric\\\" to manage virtualization, resource allocation and data transfer. The menus offered by each provider involve a discrete number of choices (virtual machine sizes) and allow providers to locate in different parts of the price-quality space. We document this differentiation empirically by running benchmarking tests. This allows us to calibrate a model of firm technology. Firm technology is an input into our theoretical model of price-quality competition. The monopoly case highlights the importance of competition in blocking \\\"bad equilibrium\\\" where performance is intentionally slowed down or options are unduly limited. In duopoly, price competition is fierce, but prices do not converge to the same level because of price-quality differentiation. The model helps explain market trends, such the healthy operating profit margin recently reported by Amazon Web Services. Our empirically calibrated model helps not only explain price cutting behavior but also how providers can manage a profit despite predictions that the market \\\"should be\\\" totally commoditized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
摘要
公共云“基础设施即服务”市场具有独特的特点,很难预测长期的经济行为。一方面,主要供应商从相同的制造商那里购买硬件,在相似的地点运营,并提供类似的产品菜单。另一方面,竞争对手使用不同的专有“结构”来管理虚拟化、资源分配和数据传输。每个供应商提供的菜单包含离散数量的选择(虚拟机大小),并允许供应商定位在价格-质量空间的不同部分。我们通过运行基准测试来记录这种差异。这使我们能够校准企业技术模型。企业技术是我们的价格质量竞争理论模型的一个输入。垄断案例突出了竞争在阻止“不良均衡”方面的重要性,在这种均衡中,业绩被故意拖慢或选择被过度限制。在双寡头垄断中,价格竞争是激烈的,但由于价格质量的差异,价格不会趋同于同一水平。该模型有助于解释市场趋势,比如亚马逊网络服务(Amazon Web Services)最近公布的健康的营业利润率。我们的经验校准模型不仅有助于解释降价行为,还有助于解释供应商如何在市场“应该”完全商品化的预测下管理利润。
Competition on Price and Quality in Cloud Computing
The public cloud "infrastructure as a service" market possesses unique features that make it difficult to predict long-run economic behavior. On the one hand, major providers buy their hardware from the same manufacturers, operate in similar locations and offer a similar menu of products. On the other hand, the competitors use different proprietary "fabric" to manage virtualization, resource allocation and data transfer. The menus offered by each provider involve a discrete number of choices (virtual machine sizes) and allow providers to locate in different parts of the price-quality space. We document this differentiation empirically by running benchmarking tests. This allows us to calibrate a model of firm technology. Firm technology is an input into our theoretical model of price-quality competition. The monopoly case highlights the importance of competition in blocking "bad equilibrium" where performance is intentionally slowed down or options are unduly limited. In duopoly, price competition is fierce, but prices do not converge to the same level because of price-quality differentiation. The model helps explain market trends, such the healthy operating profit margin recently reported by Amazon Web Services. Our empirically calibrated model helps not only explain price cutting behavior but also how providers can manage a profit despite predictions that the market "should be" totally commoditized.