多器官超声检查对肺栓塞的诊断价值

Rosen Petkov, N. Kurtelova, Y. Yamakova, E. Mekov
{"title":"多器官超声检查对肺栓塞的诊断价值","authors":"Rosen Petkov, N. Kurtelova, Y. Yamakova, E. Mekov","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) are nonspecific and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography (MCTPA) is largely used as a second-line imaging test, exposing patients to high-dose radiation and potential complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of multiorgan ultrasonography (MOUS): chest (ChUS), heart (EchCG), and leg vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) combined with Wells score and D-dimer. Methods: In a prospective study (02.2017-02.2018) we observed 55 consecutive adults (28 males and 27 females) age x = 56.2 ± SD 14.0 with suspected PE. All patients with Wells score >4 and those with score Results: PE was diagnosed in 42 of 55 enrolled patients (76.4%). ChUS yielded sensitivity (Se) 66% and specificity (Sp) of 77%, EchCG 69% and 92%, and CUS 59% and 100%, respectively. One positive result of MOUS was with accuracy (Acc) 91%, Se 95%, Sp 77% for PE. In patients with ≥2 positive US tests the Acc was 84%, Se 81% and Sp 92%. No patient received PE as a final diagnosis among the MOUS negative patients (n=10, 18%). Conclusions: MOUS is more accurate and sensitive than each one single-organ ultrasonography. In emergency conditions and/or in cases contraindicated for CTPA it could be used as an alternative imaging method for PE diagnosis, safely reducing the MCTPA burden.","PeriodicalId":20797,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary embolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism\",\"authors\":\"Rosen Petkov, N. Kurtelova, Y. Yamakova, E. Mekov\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) are nonspecific and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography (MCTPA) is largely used as a second-line imaging test, exposing patients to high-dose radiation and potential complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of multiorgan ultrasonography (MOUS): chest (ChUS), heart (EchCG), and leg vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) combined with Wells score and D-dimer. Methods: In a prospective study (02.2017-02.2018) we observed 55 consecutive adults (28 males and 27 females) age x = 56.2 ± SD 14.0 with suspected PE. All patients with Wells score >4 and those with score Results: PE was diagnosed in 42 of 55 enrolled patients (76.4%). ChUS yielded sensitivity (Se) 66% and specificity (Sp) of 77%, EchCG 69% and 92%, and CUS 59% and 100%, respectively. One positive result of MOUS was with accuracy (Acc) 91%, Se 95%, Sp 77% for PE. In patients with ≥2 positive US tests the Acc was 84%, Se 81% and Sp 92%. No patient received PE as a final diagnosis among the MOUS negative patients (n=10, 18%). Conclusions: MOUS is more accurate and sensitive than each one single-organ ultrasonography. In emergency conditions and/or in cases contraindicated for CTPA it could be used as an alternative imaging method for PE diagnosis, safely reducing the MCTPA burden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary embolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺栓塞(PE)的临床症状是非特异性的,多探头CT肺血管造影(MCTPA)主要用作二线影像学检查,使患者暴露于高剂量辐射和潜在的并发症。本研究的目的是探讨多器官超声检查(MOUS):胸部(ChUS)、心脏(EchCG)和腿部静脉压迫超声(CUS)结合Wells评分和d -二聚体的诊断价值。方法:在一项前瞻性研究(02.2017-02.2018)中,我们观察了55名年龄x = 56.2±SD 14.0的疑似PE的连续成年人(28名男性,27名女性)。结果:55例入组患者中有42例(76.4%)被诊断为PE。ChUS的敏感性(Se) 66%,特异性(Sp) 77%, eccg分别为69%和92%,CUS分别为59%和100%。其中,MOUS阳性结果的准确率(Acc)为91%,Se为95%,Sp为77%。≥2例US检测阳性的患者Acc为84%,Se为81%,Sp为92%。在mou阴性患者中,没有患者最终诊断为PE (n=10, 18%)。结论:超声造影比单器官超声检查更准确、更灵敏。在紧急情况和/或CTPA禁忌病例中,它可以作为PE诊断的替代成像方法,安全地减少MCTPA负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) are nonspecific and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography (MCTPA) is largely used as a second-line imaging test, exposing patients to high-dose radiation and potential complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of multiorgan ultrasonography (MOUS): chest (ChUS), heart (EchCG), and leg vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) combined with Wells score and D-dimer. Methods: In a prospective study (02.2017-02.2018) we observed 55 consecutive adults (28 males and 27 females) age x = 56.2 ± SD 14.0 with suspected PE. All patients with Wells score >4 and those with score Results: PE was diagnosed in 42 of 55 enrolled patients (76.4%). ChUS yielded sensitivity (Se) 66% and specificity (Sp) of 77%, EchCG 69% and 92%, and CUS 59% and 100%, respectively. One positive result of MOUS was with accuracy (Acc) 91%, Se 95%, Sp 77% for PE. In patients with ≥2 positive US tests the Acc was 84%, Se 81% and Sp 92%. No patient received PE as a final diagnosis among the MOUS negative patients (n=10, 18%). Conclusions: MOUS is more accurate and sensitive than each one single-organ ultrasonography. In emergency conditions and/or in cases contraindicated for CTPA it could be used as an alternative imaging method for PE diagnosis, safely reducing the MCTPA burden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Imaging Modalities in Venous-Thromboembolism: Ultrasound for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Imaging Modalities in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Computerized Tomography Integrating Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Tests in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism Pulmonary Embolism: Information for the Patient and Family
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1