心血管风险评分:伟大的工具……当好医生使用时

Perez De Isla, A. Saltijeral Cerezo
{"title":"心血管风险评分:伟大的工具……当好医生使用时","authors":"Perez De Isla, A. Saltijeral Cerezo","doi":"10.7775/rac.v91.i2.20624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk scores or risk scales are equations designed to determine the likelihood of an event occurring. In cardiology, cardiovascular risk scales are intended to calculate the probability of an individual’s experiencing a cardiovascular event over a period. Because of their widespread use, when we refer to risk scales, we are generally talking about scores that predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events related to atherosclerosis. But we must not forget that there are other scores dealing with other types of heart diseases. As the article in question states, (1) these scales are merely mathematical equations based on a series of variables that define risk much better than those same variables separately, as they consider the interactions that exist between their presence and intensity. The variables usually used should be accessible, pragmatic and, at the same time, valid for prediction. The accuracy of a risk equation in predicting the probability of an event occurring is usually calculated using a mathematical index called Harrell’s C-index. (2) Risk scores are very useful clinical tools, but we must be aware of their limitations before using them. Firstly, many important variables are not considered when designing a risk equation; therefore, they will have no effect in determining greater or lower risk. A clear example is seen in equations that include systolic blood pressure but not diastolic blood pressure for risk assessment. (3) What about a patient who has elevated diastolic pressure and controlled systolic pressure? Is his/her risk not increased? We believe this may be an example as easy to understand as the fact that body mass index is not yet included in many risk estimation scores. (3) Secondly, we must bear in mind that risk equations determine probability of experiencing a cardiovascular event in a population and not in a specific subject. Therefore, we can state that a certain probability will be fulfilled in a population of, for example, 1000 subjects, but we will most likely not be able to determine the exact probability of suffering a cardiovascular event in a specific subject. Further-","PeriodicalId":34966,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular Risk Scores: Great Tools... When Used by Good Physicians\",\"authors\":\"Perez De Isla, A. Saltijeral Cerezo\",\"doi\":\"10.7775/rac.v91.i2.20624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Risk scores or risk scales are equations designed to determine the likelihood of an event occurring. In cardiology, cardiovascular risk scales are intended to calculate the probability of an individual’s experiencing a cardiovascular event over a period. Because of their widespread use, when we refer to risk scales, we are generally talking about scores that predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events related to atherosclerosis. But we must not forget that there are other scores dealing with other types of heart diseases. As the article in question states, (1) these scales are merely mathematical equations based on a series of variables that define risk much better than those same variables separately, as they consider the interactions that exist between their presence and intensity. The variables usually used should be accessible, pragmatic and, at the same time, valid for prediction. The accuracy of a risk equation in predicting the probability of an event occurring is usually calculated using a mathematical index called Harrell’s C-index. (2) Risk scores are very useful clinical tools, but we must be aware of their limitations before using them. Firstly, many important variables are not considered when designing a risk equation; therefore, they will have no effect in determining greater or lower risk. A clear example is seen in equations that include systolic blood pressure but not diastolic blood pressure for risk assessment. (3) What about a patient who has elevated diastolic pressure and controlled systolic pressure? Is his/her risk not increased? We believe this may be an example as easy to understand as the fact that body mass index is not yet included in many risk estimation scores. (3) Secondly, we must bear in mind that risk equations determine probability of experiencing a cardiovascular event in a population and not in a specific subject. Therefore, we can state that a certain probability will be fulfilled in a population of, for example, 1000 subjects, but we will most likely not be able to determine the exact probability of suffering a cardiovascular event in a specific subject. Further-\",\"PeriodicalId\":34966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v91.i2.20624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v91.i2.20624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险评分或风险量表是用来确定事件发生可能性的方程。在心脏病学中,心血管风险量表旨在计算个体在一段时间内经历心血管事件的概率。由于它们的广泛使用,当我们提到风险量表时,我们通常谈论的是预测与动脉粥样硬化相关的心血管事件发生的分数。但我们不能忘记,还有其他类型的心脏疾病。正如文章所述,(1)这些尺度仅仅是基于一系列变量的数学方程,这些变量比单独定义风险要好得多,因为它们考虑了存在于它们的存在和强度之间的相互作用。通常使用的变量应该是可访问的、实用的,同时对预测有效。风险方程在预测事件发生概率时的准确性通常是用一种叫做哈勒尔c指数的数学指数来计算的。(2)风险评分是非常有用的临床工具,但在使用前必须了解其局限性。首先,在设计风险方程时没有考虑许多重要的变量;因此,它们对确定风险的高低没有任何影响。一个明显的例子是在风险评估中包括收缩压而不包括舒张压的方程式。(3)舒张压升高而收缩压控制的患者怎么办?他/她的风险没有增加吗?我们认为这可能是一个很容易理解的例子,因为许多风险评估评分中还没有包括体重指数。(3)其次,我们必须记住,风险方程决定的是人群中发生心血管事件的概率,而不是特定对象的概率。因此,我们可以说某一概率在1000人的人群中会实现,但我们很可能无法确定特定受试者患心血管事件的确切概率。进一步的,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiovascular Risk Scores: Great Tools... When Used by Good Physicians
Risk scores or risk scales are equations designed to determine the likelihood of an event occurring. In cardiology, cardiovascular risk scales are intended to calculate the probability of an individual’s experiencing a cardiovascular event over a period. Because of their widespread use, when we refer to risk scales, we are generally talking about scores that predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events related to atherosclerosis. But we must not forget that there are other scores dealing with other types of heart diseases. As the article in question states, (1) these scales are merely mathematical equations based on a series of variables that define risk much better than those same variables separately, as they consider the interactions that exist between their presence and intensity. The variables usually used should be accessible, pragmatic and, at the same time, valid for prediction. The accuracy of a risk equation in predicting the probability of an event occurring is usually calculated using a mathematical index called Harrell’s C-index. (2) Risk scores are very useful clinical tools, but we must be aware of their limitations before using them. Firstly, many important variables are not considered when designing a risk equation; therefore, they will have no effect in determining greater or lower risk. A clear example is seen in equations that include systolic blood pressure but not diastolic blood pressure for risk assessment. (3) What about a patient who has elevated diastolic pressure and controlled systolic pressure? Is his/her risk not increased? We believe this may be an example as easy to understand as the fact that body mass index is not yet included in many risk estimation scores. (3) Secondly, we must bear in mind that risk equations determine probability of experiencing a cardiovascular event in a population and not in a specific subject. Therefore, we can state that a certain probability will be fulfilled in a population of, for example, 1000 subjects, but we will most likely not be able to determine the exact probability of suffering a cardiovascular event in a specific subject. Further-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Argentina de Cardiologia
Revista Argentina de Cardiologia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinantes no convencionales de la salud cardiovascular de la mujer en Latinoamérica https://rac.sac.org.ar/index.php/rac/article/view/220/601 ¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de cuidados paliativos en insuficiencia cardíaca? Shock Cardiogénico; ARGEN SHOCK 2 y el duro camino de conocer la verdad para modificar la realidad La evolución en la discusión de pacientes: de la junta médica al Heart Team
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1