建议更改热电联产管制的经济影响

David E. Serot
{"title":"建议更改热电联产管制的经济影响","authors":"David E. Serot","doi":"10.1016/0165-0572(91)90014-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since PURPA, there has been a significant increase in cogeneration and other forms of non-utility power production. However, under regulations implementing PURPA, prices paid to cogenerators in some states exceeded the rates these firms pay to the utilities and some cogeneration contracts were based on oil prices far in excess of prevailing oil prices. FERC and state regulators now take a more market-oriented perspective, including competitive bidding. A simple model of cogeneration economics is proposed and a decision rule is derived. The implications of the decision rule are examined in terms of how potential cogenerators would respond to pricing procedures based on competitive bidding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101080,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(91)90014-T","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic implications of proposed changes in the regulation of cogeneration\",\"authors\":\"David E. Serot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-0572(91)90014-T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Since PURPA, there has been a significant increase in cogeneration and other forms of non-utility power production. However, under regulations implementing PURPA, prices paid to cogenerators in some states exceeded the rates these firms pay to the utilities and some cogeneration contracts were based on oil prices far in excess of prevailing oil prices. FERC and state regulators now take a more market-oriented perspective, including competitive bidding. A simple model of cogeneration economics is proposed and a decision rule is derived. The implications of the decision rule are examined in terms of how potential cogenerators would respond to pricing procedures based on competitive bidding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(91)90014-T\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016505729190014T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016505729190014T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自PURPA以来,热电联产和其他形式的非公用事业电力生产显著增加。然而,根据实施PURPA的规定,在一些州,支付给热电联产电厂的价格超过了这些公司支付给公用事业公司的价格,一些热电联产合同的基础价格远远高于现行油价。联邦能源管理委员会和各州监管机构现在采取了更以市场为导向的观点,包括竞争性招标。提出了一个简单的热电联产经济模型,并推导了决策规则。根据潜在的联合发电机组将如何对基于竞争性招标的定价程序作出反应来审查决策规则的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic implications of proposed changes in the regulation of cogeneration

Since PURPA, there has been a significant increase in cogeneration and other forms of non-utility power production. However, under regulations implementing PURPA, prices paid to cogenerators in some states exceeded the rates these firms pay to the utilities and some cogeneration contracts were based on oil prices far in excess of prevailing oil prices. FERC and state regulators now take a more market-oriented perspective, including competitive bidding. A simple model of cogeneration economics is proposed and a decision rule is derived. The implications of the decision rule are examined in terms of how potential cogenerators would respond to pricing procedures based on competitive bidding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capital recovery for the regulated firm under certainty and regulatory uncertainty The oil market and international agreements on CO2 emissions Land use with endogenous environmental degradation and conservation Announcement and call for papers Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1