异步在线讨论中学生参与模式与学习满意度、学习成就的关系研究

IF 8.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI:10.46328/ijte.420
Beomkyu Choi
{"title":"异步在线讨论中学生参与模式与学习满意度、学习成就的关系研究","authors":"Beomkyu Choi","doi":"10.46328/ijte.420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examining how people learn in various learning environments is at the core of the science of learning. The more we understand how students learn from different dimensions and aspects, the better equipped we are to support their learning. This study aims to expand our understanding of how learning occurs within the context of an asynchronous online discussion. Several studies have investigated and reported on how to effectively structure and facilitate an asynchronous online discussion to promote high-quality discourse from an interventionist perspective. From the situative, participatory perspective on knowing and learning, this study aims at examining the quality of participation in an asynchronous online discussion. This includes the examination of students’ participation patterns in asynchronous online discussions and the analyses of how these patterns explain their learning satisfaction and achievement. The present study identified the following participation patterns: Efficientist, Facilitator, Synthesizer, and Slacker found that there was a strong relationship of the participation patterns with learning satisfaction and learning achievement. The results indicate that participation patterns could be an important factor influencing student learning experience in an asynchronous online discussion. Future directions for research are discussed, including the analysis of social dynamics that could have an impact on participation patterns","PeriodicalId":13871,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Relationships of the Students’ Participation Patterns with their Learning Satisfaction and Learning Achievement in Asynchronous Online Discussions\",\"authors\":\"Beomkyu Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.46328/ijte.420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Examining how people learn in various learning environments is at the core of the science of learning. The more we understand how students learn from different dimensions and aspects, the better equipped we are to support their learning. This study aims to expand our understanding of how learning occurs within the context of an asynchronous online discussion. Several studies have investigated and reported on how to effectively structure and facilitate an asynchronous online discussion to promote high-quality discourse from an interventionist perspective. From the situative, participatory perspective on knowing and learning, this study aims at examining the quality of participation in an asynchronous online discussion. This includes the examination of students’ participation patterns in asynchronous online discussions and the analyses of how these patterns explain their learning satisfaction and achievement. The present study identified the following participation patterns: Efficientist, Facilitator, Synthesizer, and Slacker found that there was a strong relationship of the participation patterns with learning satisfaction and learning achievement. The results indicate that participation patterns could be an important factor influencing student learning experience in an asynchronous online discussion. Future directions for research are discussed, including the analysis of social dynamics that could have an impact on participation patterns\",\"PeriodicalId\":13871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.420\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人们如何在不同的学习环境中学习是学习科学的核心。我们越了解学生如何从不同的维度和方面学习,我们就越能更好地支持他们的学习。本研究旨在扩展我们对异步在线讨论中学习如何发生的理解。一些研究调查并报道了如何从干预主义的角度有效地组织和促进异步在线讨论,以促进高质量的话语。本研究从认知与学习的情境性、参与性视角出发,旨在考察异步在线讨论的参与质量。这包括检查学生在异步在线讨论中的参与模式,并分析这些模式如何解释他们的学习满意度和成就。本研究确定了效率型、Facilitator型、Synthesizer型和Slacker型的参与模式,发现参与模式与学习满意度和学习成就之间存在较强的关系。结果表明,在异步在线讨论中,参与模式可能是影响学生学习体验的重要因素。讨论了未来的研究方向,包括分析可能对参与模式产生影响的社会动态
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Relationships of the Students’ Participation Patterns with their Learning Satisfaction and Learning Achievement in Asynchronous Online Discussions
Examining how people learn in various learning environments is at the core of the science of learning. The more we understand how students learn from different dimensions and aspects, the better equipped we are to support their learning. This study aims to expand our understanding of how learning occurs within the context of an asynchronous online discussion. Several studies have investigated and reported on how to effectively structure and facilitate an asynchronous online discussion to promote high-quality discourse from an interventionist perspective. From the situative, participatory perspective on knowing and learning, this study aims at examining the quality of participation in an asynchronous online discussion. This includes the examination of students’ participation patterns in asynchronous online discussions and the analyses of how these patterns explain their learning satisfaction and achievement. The present study identified the following participation patterns: Efficientist, Facilitator, Synthesizer, and Slacker found that there was a strong relationship of the participation patterns with learning satisfaction and learning achievement. The results indicate that participation patterns could be an important factor influencing student learning experience in an asynchronous online discussion. Future directions for research are discussed, including the analysis of social dynamics that could have an impact on participation patterns
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
76.7 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks to foster the sharing of critical scholarly works and information exchange across diverse cultural perspectives in the fields of technology-enhanced and digital learning in higher education. It aims to advance scientific knowledge on the human and personal aspects of technology use in higher education, while keeping readers informed about the latest developments in applying digital technologies to learning, training, research, and management.
期刊最新文献
Mediation/moderation effects of engagement, foreign language enjoyment, and ambiguity tolerance in metaverse-based foreign language learning Comparison of generative AI performance on undergraduate and postgraduate written assessments in the biomedical sciences Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education Understanding college students’ test anxiety in asynchronous online courses: the mediating role of emotional engagement Rethinking assessment strategies to improve authentic representations of learning: using blogs as a creative assessment alternative to develop professional skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1