分裂社会中的情感与理性:纠缠、冲突、可能性

L. Tønder
{"title":"分裂社会中的情感与理性:纠缠、冲突、可能性","authors":"L. Tønder","doi":"10.1080/1600910X.2021.1999839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay introduces the special issue on affect and reason in deeply divided societies. Common to all essays in the special issue is a shared belief that political and social theory need a new framework for analyzing the relationship between affect and reason. This goes especially for societies marked by ever-growing cleavages, ethnic diversity, ideological struggles, and deep political pluralism. The purpose of this introductory essay is to outline – and substantiate – the reasons behind this belief. The essay provides an overview of the current debate on affect and reason, highlighting both contributions and limitations. The essay then proceeds to outline the specifics of the alternative framework developed in the ensuing 10 essays.","PeriodicalId":42670,"journal":{"name":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affect and reason in divided societies: entanglement, conflict, possibility\",\"authors\":\"L. Tønder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1600910X.2021.1999839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay introduces the special issue on affect and reason in deeply divided societies. Common to all essays in the special issue is a shared belief that political and social theory need a new framework for analyzing the relationship between affect and reason. This goes especially for societies marked by ever-growing cleavages, ethnic diversity, ideological struggles, and deep political pluralism. The purpose of this introductory essay is to outline – and substantiate – the reasons behind this belief. The essay provides an overview of the current debate on affect and reason, highlighting both contributions and limitations. The essay then proceeds to outline the specifics of the alternative framework developed in the ensuing 10 essays.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2021.1999839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2021.1999839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文介绍了深度分裂社会中情感与理性的特刊。特刊上的所有文章都有一个共同的信念,即政治和社会理论需要一个新的框架来分析情感与理性之间的关系。这尤其适用于那些分裂日益加剧、种族多样性、意识形态斗争和政治多元化的社会。这篇介绍性文章的目的是概述——并证实——这种信念背后的原因。这篇文章概述了目前关于情感和理性的辩论,突出了两者的贡献和局限性。这篇文章接着概述了在随后的10篇文章中开发的替代框架的细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Affect and reason in divided societies: entanglement, conflict, possibility
ABSTRACT This essay introduces the special issue on affect and reason in deeply divided societies. Common to all essays in the special issue is a shared belief that political and social theory need a new framework for analyzing the relationship between affect and reason. This goes especially for societies marked by ever-growing cleavages, ethnic diversity, ideological struggles, and deep political pluralism. The purpose of this introductory essay is to outline – and substantiate – the reasons behind this belief. The essay provides an overview of the current debate on affect and reason, highlighting both contributions and limitations. The essay then proceeds to outline the specifics of the alternative framework developed in the ensuing 10 essays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Special issue: the elements of theorizing The end (and persistence) of subjectivity: Lukács with Adorno, Adorno with Lukács Totality and incoherence: for a shared project of novel theory and black studies Thinking hegemony otherwise – an educational critique of Mouffe’s agonism (Re)search results: search engines and the logic of efficiency in scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1