与使用Periotest®的标准种植体相比,评估短种植体的稳定性:一项初步研究

S. A. Banihashemrad, A. Forouzanfar, M. Gholami, Farshad Ramezani, S. B. Rad, Farid Haghdadi
{"title":"与使用Periotest®的标准种植体相比,评估短种植体的稳定性:一项初步研究","authors":"S. A. Banihashemrad, A. Forouzanfar, M. Gholami, Farshad Ramezani, S. B. Rad, Farid Haghdadi","doi":"10.22038/JDMT.2020.44952.1327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Among different non-invasive approaches for determining the stability of the implant within the bone is to use a dynamic device called Periotest®.It is designed to provide objective measurement of tooth mobility. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the stress transfer and stability in short and standard dental implants using Periotest® device. Methods: This study evaluated 15 short and 15 standard implants for non-systemically compromised patients who were candidates for dental implant. After the implant insertion, the Periotest Value (PTV) index was measured by the Periotest® device in two periods, three month after implant installation when the healing abutment was placed and six months after permanent restoration. The stability was measured by Periotest®, and the obtained numbers were analyzed by the Wilcoxon test. Results: The mean values of PTVs in the group of short implants were as much as -1.13±0.91 and -1.46±0.91 before and after loading, respectively. Moreover, the mean values of PTVs in the standard implant group were as much as -1.6±1.12 and -1.8±0.67 before and after loading, respectively. The difference between short implants before and after loading was not significant. Furthermore, the PTVs in standard implants showed no significant difference before and after loading. Also there was no significant difference between short and standard implants at both times before and after loading. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between short and standard implants in terms of stability; therefore, they can be a good alternative to standard implants in atrophic jaws.","PeriodicalId":15640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","volume":"29 1","pages":"63-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Stability in Short Implants Compared to Standard Implants using Periotest ®: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Banihashemrad, A. Forouzanfar, M. Gholami, Farshad Ramezani, S. B. Rad, Farid Haghdadi\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/JDMT.2020.44952.1327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Among different non-invasive approaches for determining the stability of the implant within the bone is to use a dynamic device called Periotest®.It is designed to provide objective measurement of tooth mobility. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the stress transfer and stability in short and standard dental implants using Periotest® device. Methods: This study evaluated 15 short and 15 standard implants for non-systemically compromised patients who were candidates for dental implant. After the implant insertion, the Periotest Value (PTV) index was measured by the Periotest® device in two periods, three month after implant installation when the healing abutment was placed and six months after permanent restoration. The stability was measured by Periotest®, and the obtained numbers were analyzed by the Wilcoxon test. Results: The mean values of PTVs in the group of short implants were as much as -1.13±0.91 and -1.46±0.91 before and after loading, respectively. Moreover, the mean values of PTVs in the standard implant group were as much as -1.6±1.12 and -1.8±0.67 before and after loading, respectively. The difference between short implants before and after loading was not significant. Furthermore, the PTVs in standard implants showed no significant difference before and after loading. Also there was no significant difference between short and standard implants at both times before and after loading. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between short and standard implants in terms of stability; therefore, they can be a good alternative to standard implants in atrophic jaws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"63-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/JDMT.2020.44952.1327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JDMT.2020.44952.1327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在确定植入物在骨内稳定性的不同非侵入性方法中,使用一种称为Periotest®的动态装置。它的设计是为了提供牙齿活动度的客观测量。本研究的目的是评估使用Periotest®装置的短标准种植体的应力传递和稳定性。方法:本研究评估了15个短种植体和15个标准种植体对非系统损害患者的候选种植体。植入种植体后,使用Periotest®设备在植入种植体后放置愈合基台后3个月和永久修复后6个月两个阶段测量牙周值(Periotest Value, PTV)指数。稳定性采用Periotest®进行测量,所得数据采用Wilcoxon检验进行分析。结果:短种植体组的PTVs在加载前和加载后的平均值分别为-1.13±0.91和-1.46±0.91。此外,标准种植体组的ptv在加载前和加载后的平均值分别高达-1.6±1.12和-1.8±0.67。短种植体在加载前后的差异不显著。此外,标准种植体的PTVs在加载前后没有显着差异。此外,短种植体与标准种植体在加载前后均无显著差异。结论:短种植体与标准种植体在稳定性方面无显著差异;因此,在萎缩的颌骨中,它们可以成为标准植入物的良好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Stability in Short Implants Compared to Standard Implants using Periotest ®: A Pilot Study
Introduction: Among different non-invasive approaches for determining the stability of the implant within the bone is to use a dynamic device called Periotest®.It is designed to provide objective measurement of tooth mobility. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the stress transfer and stability in short and standard dental implants using Periotest® device. Methods: This study evaluated 15 short and 15 standard implants for non-systemically compromised patients who were candidates for dental implant. After the implant insertion, the Periotest Value (PTV) index was measured by the Periotest® device in two periods, three month after implant installation when the healing abutment was placed and six months after permanent restoration. The stability was measured by Periotest®, and the obtained numbers were analyzed by the Wilcoxon test. Results: The mean values of PTVs in the group of short implants were as much as -1.13±0.91 and -1.46±0.91 before and after loading, respectively. Moreover, the mean values of PTVs in the standard implant group were as much as -1.6±1.12 and -1.8±0.67 before and after loading, respectively. The difference between short implants before and after loading was not significant. Furthermore, the PTVs in standard implants showed no significant difference before and after loading. Also there was no significant difference between short and standard implants at both times before and after loading. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between short and standard implants in terms of stability; therefore, they can be a good alternative to standard implants in atrophic jaws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Citric Acid in Endodontics: A Review The Evaluation of the Effect of Coffee Staining and 16% Carbamide Peroxide Bleaching on the Color Change of Chairside CAD/CAM Ceramics Intentional Replantation: an Approach to Save Hopeless Natural Teeth (A Case Report) The Effect of Linear and Angular Midline Deviation on Smile Attractiveness Regarding Facial Height Evaluation of the Polymerization Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1