神学与大学:对沃尔夫教授的回答

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION International Journal of Public Theology Pub Date : 2022-10-18 DOI:10.1163/15697320-20220051
Oliver D. Crisp
{"title":"神学与大学:对沃尔夫教授的回答","authors":"Oliver D. Crisp","doi":"10.1163/15697320-20220051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Wolfe has provided an eloquent and appealing account of the relevance of the study of Christian theology in the modern university, characterizing it in good Thomist fashion as the study of God and all things in relation to God – a very expansive vision of the theological task indeed. She then goes on to explain how Christian theology still has a place in the modern university, and, to my mind, there is little to disagree with in the vision she casts. Nevertheless, it is a particular vision of the theological task, and one that will not be acceptable to all those who practice theology today, let alone those critics of the place of theology in the modern university. In my response to Professor Wolfe’s lecture, I want to draw attention to two issues. First, I want to say something about what we might call the shared task of Christian theology – that is, the core concerns, if there are any such, that most theologians think of as part-and-parcel of theology rightly pursued. Second, I want to say something about why this shared task may still be a suitable pursuit for those at work in the modern university. I think of these remarks as, in many respects, friendly additions to Professor Wolfe’s presentation, rather than as criticisms of it.","PeriodicalId":43324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Theology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theology and the University: A Reply to Professor Wolfe\",\"authors\":\"Oliver D. Crisp\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15697320-20220051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Wolfe has provided an eloquent and appealing account of the relevance of the study of Christian theology in the modern university, characterizing it in good Thomist fashion as the study of God and all things in relation to God – a very expansive vision of the theological task indeed. She then goes on to explain how Christian theology still has a place in the modern university, and, to my mind, there is little to disagree with in the vision she casts. Nevertheless, it is a particular vision of the theological task, and one that will not be acceptable to all those who practice theology today, let alone those critics of the place of theology in the modern university. In my response to Professor Wolfe’s lecture, I want to draw attention to two issues. First, I want to say something about what we might call the shared task of Christian theology – that is, the core concerns, if there are any such, that most theologians think of as part-and-parcel of theology rightly pursued. Second, I want to say something about why this shared task may still be a suitable pursuit for those at work in the modern university. I think of these remarks as, in many respects, friendly additions to Professor Wolfe’s presentation, rather than as criticisms of it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Public Theology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Public Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20220051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20220051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Wolfe教授为现代大学中基督教神学研究的相关性提供了一个雄辩而吸引人的描述,以良好的托马斯主义风格将其描述为对上帝以及与上帝有关的所有事物的研究——这确实是神学任务的一个非常广阔的视野。然后她继续解释基督教神学如何在现代大学中占有一席之地,在我看来,她所描绘的愿景几乎没有什么不同意的。然而,这是对神学任务的一种特殊看法,并不是今天所有从事神学实践的人都能接受的,更不用说那些批评神学在现代大学中地位的人了。在回应沃尔夫教授的演讲时,我想提请大家注意两个问题。首先,我想谈谈我们所谓的基督教神学的共同任务,也就是说,核心问题,如果有的话,大多数神学家认为是神学正确追求的一部分。其次,我想说的是,为什么这个共同的任务可能仍然适合那些在现代大学工作的人。在很多方面,我认为这些评论是对沃尔夫教授的演讲的友好补充,而不是批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theology and the University: A Reply to Professor Wolfe
Professor Wolfe has provided an eloquent and appealing account of the relevance of the study of Christian theology in the modern university, characterizing it in good Thomist fashion as the study of God and all things in relation to God – a very expansive vision of the theological task indeed. She then goes on to explain how Christian theology still has a place in the modern university, and, to my mind, there is little to disagree with in the vision she casts. Nevertheless, it is a particular vision of the theological task, and one that will not be acceptable to all those who practice theology today, let alone those critics of the place of theology in the modern university. In my response to Professor Wolfe’s lecture, I want to draw attention to two issues. First, I want to say something about what we might call the shared task of Christian theology – that is, the core concerns, if there are any such, that most theologians think of as part-and-parcel of theology rightly pursued. Second, I want to say something about why this shared task may still be a suitable pursuit for those at work in the modern university. I think of these remarks as, in many respects, friendly additions to Professor Wolfe’s presentation, rather than as criticisms of it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
On Critiquing Christian Nationalism: Two Recent Books on the Perils of Christian Nationalism Intersex and Medical Health: a Construction of a Public Health Theology Paradigm for Sexual Polymorphism in Indonesia Beyond the Shadows: a Public Theology of Disability Inclusion Triangulated Challenges to Democracy: a Critical Voice of Public Theology to Counter Fear and Escalating Polarization in Indonesia Binding Citizenship as a Bridge between Communities and Institutions: Dialogues between Christian Social Ethics, Political Philosophy and Social Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1