最后的欢呼效应:期末时间标志增加了金融冒险

Xinlong Li, Avni M Shah
{"title":"最后的欢呼效应:期末时间标志增加了金融冒险","authors":"Xinlong Li, Avni M Shah","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3702775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are people more likely to take financial risks at the end of a work week? Using a unique panel dataset of peer-to-peer lending loans from Prosper Marketplace, Inc, we investigate whether temporal landmarks associated with the end of a period influence financial risk-taking. We find that investors are more likely to select riskier loans at the last day of a work week (i.e., Fridays) relative to other weekdays (Monday through Thursday). Our results are robust to the inclusion of investor experience, supply-side (e.g., loan availability) and demand-side (e.g., number of investors) control variables as well as time, and geographic fixed effects. Consistent with a mental accounting framework where end-of-period landmarks trigger a last hurrah effect, we find that alternative end-of-period markers (i.e., the Wednesday or Thursday preceding a holiday weekend, the last day of the month) also lead to significant increases in risk-taking. We use a variety of robustness checks as well as a laboratory experiment to rule out several alternative explanations. Finally, we demonstrate that this end-of-period effect has financial repercussions downstream yielding significantly worse returns relative to investments made on other days. We conclude by discussing how this can affect consumers’ financial decision making and policy.","PeriodicalId":8731,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","volume":"55 50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Last Hurrah Effect: End-of-Period Temporal Landmarks Increase Financial Risk-Taking\",\"authors\":\"Xinlong Li, Avni M Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3702775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Are people more likely to take financial risks at the end of a work week? Using a unique panel dataset of peer-to-peer lending loans from Prosper Marketplace, Inc, we investigate whether temporal landmarks associated with the end of a period influence financial risk-taking. We find that investors are more likely to select riskier loans at the last day of a work week (i.e., Fridays) relative to other weekdays (Monday through Thursday). Our results are robust to the inclusion of investor experience, supply-side (e.g., loan availability) and demand-side (e.g., number of investors) control variables as well as time, and geographic fixed effects. Consistent with a mental accounting framework where end-of-period landmarks trigger a last hurrah effect, we find that alternative end-of-period markers (i.e., the Wednesday or Thursday preceding a holiday weekend, the last day of the month) also lead to significant increases in risk-taking. We use a variety of robustness checks as well as a laboratory experiment to rule out several alternative explanations. Finally, we demonstrate that this end-of-period effect has financial repercussions downstream yielding significantly worse returns relative to investments made on other days. We conclude by discussing how this can affect consumers’ financial decision making and policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"55 50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3702775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3702775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们是否更有可能在一周的工作结束时承担财务风险?利用Prosper Marketplace, Inc .提供的独特的p2p贷款面板数据集,我们调查了与一段时期结束相关的时间标志是否会影响金融风险承担。我们发现,相对于其他工作日(周一至周四),投资者更有可能在工作周的最后一天(即周五)选择风险更高的贷款。我们的结果对于包括投资者经验、供应方(例如,贷款可用性)和需求方(例如,投资者数量)控制变量以及时间和地理固定效应都是稳健的。与期末里程碑触发最后狂欢效应的心理会计框架一致,我们发现,其他期末标记(即假期周末前的周三或周四,一个月的最后一天)也会导致冒险行为显著增加。我们使用各种鲁棒性检查以及实验室实验来排除几种替代解释。最后,我们证明了这种期末效应对下游的财务影响,相对于其他日子的投资,产生了明显更差的回报。最后,我们将讨论这将如何影响消费者的金融决策和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Last Hurrah Effect: End-of-Period Temporal Landmarks Increase Financial Risk-Taking
Are people more likely to take financial risks at the end of a work week? Using a unique panel dataset of peer-to-peer lending loans from Prosper Marketplace, Inc, we investigate whether temporal landmarks associated with the end of a period influence financial risk-taking. We find that investors are more likely to select riskier loans at the last day of a work week (i.e., Fridays) relative to other weekdays (Monday through Thursday). Our results are robust to the inclusion of investor experience, supply-side (e.g., loan availability) and demand-side (e.g., number of investors) control variables as well as time, and geographic fixed effects. Consistent with a mental accounting framework where end-of-period landmarks trigger a last hurrah effect, we find that alternative end-of-period markers (i.e., the Wednesday or Thursday preceding a holiday weekend, the last day of the month) also lead to significant increases in risk-taking. We use a variety of robustness checks as well as a laboratory experiment to rule out several alternative explanations. Finally, we demonstrate that this end-of-period effect has financial repercussions downstream yielding significantly worse returns relative to investments made on other days. We conclude by discussing how this can affect consumers’ financial decision making and policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Religious Diversity Play Roles in Corporate Environmental Decisions? Distrust or Speculation? The Socioeconomic Drivers of U.S. Cryptocurrency Investments The Efficient Horizon of Expectation and Stock Prices Being Present: The Influence of Mindfulness on Financial Decisions Algorithmic Trading in Experimental Markets with Human Traders: A Literature Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1