Amjed Hassan, M. Mahmoud, M. Kamal, A. Al-Majed, A. Al-Nakhli, S. M. S. Hussain, S. Patil
{"title":"热化学流体与Gemini表面活性剂缓解凝析气堆积的比较研究","authors":"Amjed Hassan, M. Mahmoud, M. Kamal, A. Al-Majed, A. Al-Nakhli, S. M. S. Hussain, S. Patil","doi":"10.2118/206023-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Accumulation of condensate liquid around the production well can cause a significant reduction in gas production. Several methods are used to mitigate the condensate bank and maintain the gas production. The most effective approaches are altering the rock wettability or inducing multiple fractures around the wellbore. This paper presents a comparison study for two effective approaches in mitigating the condensate bank. The performance of thermochemical fluids (TCF) and gemini surfactant (GS) in removing the condensate liquid and improve the formation productivity is studied.\n In this work, several experiments were carried out including coreflooding, capillary pressure, and relative permeability measurements. The profiles of condensate saturations show that GS can mitigate the condensate bank by 84%, while TCF removed around 63% of the condensate liquid. Also, GS and TCF treatments can increase the relative permeability to condensate liquid by factors of 1.89 and 1.22 respectively, due to the wettability alteration mechanism. Capillary pressure calculations show that GS can reduce the capillary pressure by around 40% on average, while TCF leads to a 70% reduction in the capillary forces.\n Overall, injection of GS into the condensate region can lead to changing the wettability condition due to the chemical adsorption of GS on the pore surface, and thereby reduce the capillary forces and improve the condensate mobility. On the other hand, TCF injection can improve rock permeability and reduce capillary pressure. Both treatments (GS and TCF) showed very attractive performance in mitigating the condensate bank and improving the formation production for the long term. Finally, an integrated approach is presented that can mitigate the condensate damage by around 95%, utilizing the effective mechanisms of GS and TCF chemicals.","PeriodicalId":10965,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigation of Gas Condensate Banking Using Thermochemical Fluids and Gemini Surfactant: A Comparison Study\",\"authors\":\"Amjed Hassan, M. Mahmoud, M. Kamal, A. Al-Majed, A. Al-Nakhli, S. M. S. Hussain, S. Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/206023-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Accumulation of condensate liquid around the production well can cause a significant reduction in gas production. Several methods are used to mitigate the condensate bank and maintain the gas production. The most effective approaches are altering the rock wettability or inducing multiple fractures around the wellbore. This paper presents a comparison study for two effective approaches in mitigating the condensate bank. The performance of thermochemical fluids (TCF) and gemini surfactant (GS) in removing the condensate liquid and improve the formation productivity is studied.\\n In this work, several experiments were carried out including coreflooding, capillary pressure, and relative permeability measurements. The profiles of condensate saturations show that GS can mitigate the condensate bank by 84%, while TCF removed around 63% of the condensate liquid. Also, GS and TCF treatments can increase the relative permeability to condensate liquid by factors of 1.89 and 1.22 respectively, due to the wettability alteration mechanism. Capillary pressure calculations show that GS can reduce the capillary pressure by around 40% on average, while TCF leads to a 70% reduction in the capillary forces.\\n Overall, injection of GS into the condensate region can lead to changing the wettability condition due to the chemical adsorption of GS on the pore surface, and thereby reduce the capillary forces and improve the condensate mobility. On the other hand, TCF injection can improve rock permeability and reduce capillary pressure. Both treatments (GS and TCF) showed very attractive performance in mitigating the condensate bank and improving the formation production for the long term. Finally, an integrated approach is presented that can mitigate the condensate damage by around 95%, utilizing the effective mechanisms of GS and TCF chemicals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/206023-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206023-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mitigation of Gas Condensate Banking Using Thermochemical Fluids and Gemini Surfactant: A Comparison Study
Accumulation of condensate liquid around the production well can cause a significant reduction in gas production. Several methods are used to mitigate the condensate bank and maintain the gas production. The most effective approaches are altering the rock wettability or inducing multiple fractures around the wellbore. This paper presents a comparison study for two effective approaches in mitigating the condensate bank. The performance of thermochemical fluids (TCF) and gemini surfactant (GS) in removing the condensate liquid and improve the formation productivity is studied.
In this work, several experiments were carried out including coreflooding, capillary pressure, and relative permeability measurements. The profiles of condensate saturations show that GS can mitigate the condensate bank by 84%, while TCF removed around 63% of the condensate liquid. Also, GS and TCF treatments can increase the relative permeability to condensate liquid by factors of 1.89 and 1.22 respectively, due to the wettability alteration mechanism. Capillary pressure calculations show that GS can reduce the capillary pressure by around 40% on average, while TCF leads to a 70% reduction in the capillary forces.
Overall, injection of GS into the condensate region can lead to changing the wettability condition due to the chemical adsorption of GS on the pore surface, and thereby reduce the capillary forces and improve the condensate mobility. On the other hand, TCF injection can improve rock permeability and reduce capillary pressure. Both treatments (GS and TCF) showed very attractive performance in mitigating the condensate bank and improving the formation production for the long term. Finally, an integrated approach is presented that can mitigate the condensate damage by around 95%, utilizing the effective mechanisms of GS and TCF chemicals.