PG53 COVID - 19插管模拟:为UCLH新常态做准备

Rose English, Jeremy Hill, Maximilian Neun, A. Hulme, Anna M. Collinson, E. Hoogenboom
{"title":"PG53 COVID - 19插管模拟:为UCLH新常态做准备","authors":"Rose English, Jeremy Hill, Maximilian Neun, A. Hulme, Anna M. Collinson, E. Hoogenboom","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In situ simulation is an effective tool for rehearsing high risk situations (Patterson et al, 2013), detecting latent risks and testing operational readiness (Kobayashi et al, 2006). In anticipation of an influx of patients requiring intubation for COVID-19, we used simulation to identify and mitigate latent risks, rehearse team dynamics and improve staff confidence before the start of the pandemic. Summary of Project In March 2020, we delivered eleven in-situ simulations in the emergency department and the newly appointed intensive care overflow area in theatres. Participants were expected to perform a rapid sequence induction (RSI) using a new COVID-19 RSI checklist and airway grab box on an airway mannequin. Extra staff observed in active roles, delivering feedback on technical and non-technical skills. Post-simulation debrief identified learning points and latent threats requiring system changes. These were shared with staff dynamically throughout the process. We produced and distributed an exemplar video as an educational tool for those unable to attend. Feedback assessed how the training had influenced participants’ clinical practice and preparedness. Results Participants included anaesthetic, intensive care and emergency department doctors, nurses and operating department practitioners. Table 1 shows examples of learning points identified: Discussion Simulations were well attended. Debriefs yielded technical and non-technical learning points. Participants valued the opportunity to rehearse non-usual steps and communication in PPE. The majority reported reduced anxiety levels as a result of the training. Identified latent threats triggered revisions to policy, RSI checklist and airway grab box contents. Challenges included a need to preserve PPE, short preparation time and limited staff availability of both facilitators and participants due to ongoing elective work. Recommendations Our experience supports the use of in situ simulation for rapid staff training, as well as timely testing and refinement of new systems prior to clinical use in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reference Kobayashi L, Shapiro MJ, Sucov A, Woolard R, Boss RM, Dunbar J, Sciamacco R, Karpik K and Jay G. Portable advanced medical simulation for new emergency department testing and orientation. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(6):pp. 691–5. Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, LeMaster T. and Wears RL. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(6):pp. 468–77.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PG53 COVID 19 Intubation Simulation: Preparing for the new normal at UCLH\",\"authors\":\"Rose English, Jeremy Hill, Maximilian Neun, A. Hulme, Anna M. Collinson, E. Hoogenboom\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background In situ simulation is an effective tool for rehearsing high risk situations (Patterson et al, 2013), detecting latent risks and testing operational readiness (Kobayashi et al, 2006). In anticipation of an influx of patients requiring intubation for COVID-19, we used simulation to identify and mitigate latent risks, rehearse team dynamics and improve staff confidence before the start of the pandemic. Summary of Project In March 2020, we delivered eleven in-situ simulations in the emergency department and the newly appointed intensive care overflow area in theatres. Participants were expected to perform a rapid sequence induction (RSI) using a new COVID-19 RSI checklist and airway grab box on an airway mannequin. Extra staff observed in active roles, delivering feedback on technical and non-technical skills. Post-simulation debrief identified learning points and latent threats requiring system changes. These were shared with staff dynamically throughout the process. We produced and distributed an exemplar video as an educational tool for those unable to attend. Feedback assessed how the training had influenced participants’ clinical practice and preparedness. Results Participants included anaesthetic, intensive care and emergency department doctors, nurses and operating department practitioners. Table 1 shows examples of learning points identified: Discussion Simulations were well attended. Debriefs yielded technical and non-technical learning points. Participants valued the opportunity to rehearse non-usual steps and communication in PPE. The majority reported reduced anxiety levels as a result of the training. Identified latent threats triggered revisions to policy, RSI checklist and airway grab box contents. Challenges included a need to preserve PPE, short preparation time and limited staff availability of both facilitators and participants due to ongoing elective work. Recommendations Our experience supports the use of in situ simulation for rapid staff training, as well as timely testing and refinement of new systems prior to clinical use in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reference Kobayashi L, Shapiro MJ, Sucov A, Woolard R, Boss RM, Dunbar J, Sciamacco R, Karpik K and Jay G. Portable advanced medical simulation for new emergency department testing and orientation. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(6):pp. 691–5. Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, LeMaster T. and Wears RL. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(6):pp. 468–77.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现场模拟是演练高风险情况(Patterson et al ., 2013)、发现潜在风险和测试作战准备情况(Kobayashi et al ., 2006)的有效工具。由于预计COVID-19需要插管的患者会大量涌入,我们在大流行开始之前使用模拟来识别和减轻潜在风险,排练团队动态并提高员工信心。2020年3月,我们在急诊科和新指定的手术室重症监护溢出区进行了11次现场模拟。预计参与者将使用新的COVID-19 RSI检查表和气道抓取盒在气道人体模型上执行快速序列诱导(RSI)。额外的员工被观察到积极的角色,提供技术和非技术技能的反馈。模拟后汇报确定了需要系统更改的学习点和潜在威胁。这些信息在整个过程中与员工动态共享。我们制作并分发了一个示范视频,作为无法参加的人的教育工具。反馈评估了培训如何影响参与者的临床实践和准备工作。结果参与者包括麻醉科、重症监护科和急诊科医生、护士和手术科从业人员。表1显示了确定的学习点的示例:汇报产生了技术和非技术的学习要点。与会者很重视这次演练个人防护装备非常规步骤和沟通的机会。大多数人报告说,训练的结果是焦虑水平降低了。确定了潜在威胁,触发了对政策、RSI检查表和气道抓取箱内容的修订。挑战包括需要保存个人防护装备,准备时间短,由于正在进行的选择性工作,辅助人员和参与者的可用性有限。我们的经验支持在COVID-19大流行背景下使用现场模拟进行快速工作人员培训,以及在临床使用之前及时测试和改进新系统。参考文献Kobayashi L, Shapiro MJ, Sucov A, Woolard R, Boss RM, Dunbar J, Sciamacco R, Karpik K, Jay G.便携式先进医学模拟新急诊科测试和定位。中华医学杂志,2006;13(6):pp。691 - 5。Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, LeMaster T.和Wears RL。现场模拟:高风险急诊科安全威胁检测与团队合作训练。中华医学杂志,2013;22(6):pp。468 - 77。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PG53 COVID 19 Intubation Simulation: Preparing for the new normal at UCLH
Background In situ simulation is an effective tool for rehearsing high risk situations (Patterson et al, 2013), detecting latent risks and testing operational readiness (Kobayashi et al, 2006). In anticipation of an influx of patients requiring intubation for COVID-19, we used simulation to identify and mitigate latent risks, rehearse team dynamics and improve staff confidence before the start of the pandemic. Summary of Project In March 2020, we delivered eleven in-situ simulations in the emergency department and the newly appointed intensive care overflow area in theatres. Participants were expected to perform a rapid sequence induction (RSI) using a new COVID-19 RSI checklist and airway grab box on an airway mannequin. Extra staff observed in active roles, delivering feedback on technical and non-technical skills. Post-simulation debrief identified learning points and latent threats requiring system changes. These were shared with staff dynamically throughout the process. We produced and distributed an exemplar video as an educational tool for those unable to attend. Feedback assessed how the training had influenced participants’ clinical practice and preparedness. Results Participants included anaesthetic, intensive care and emergency department doctors, nurses and operating department practitioners. Table 1 shows examples of learning points identified: Discussion Simulations were well attended. Debriefs yielded technical and non-technical learning points. Participants valued the opportunity to rehearse non-usual steps and communication in PPE. The majority reported reduced anxiety levels as a result of the training. Identified latent threats triggered revisions to policy, RSI checklist and airway grab box contents. Challenges included a need to preserve PPE, short preparation time and limited staff availability of both facilitators and participants due to ongoing elective work. Recommendations Our experience supports the use of in situ simulation for rapid staff training, as well as timely testing and refinement of new systems prior to clinical use in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reference Kobayashi L, Shapiro MJ, Sucov A, Woolard R, Boss RM, Dunbar J, Sciamacco R, Karpik K and Jay G. Portable advanced medical simulation for new emergency department testing and orientation. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13(6):pp. 691–5. Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, LeMaster T. and Wears RL. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(6):pp. 468–77.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice. Virtual tabletop simulations for primary care pandemic preparedness and response. Developing a simulation programme to train airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital. Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice? Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1