{"title":"创造性思维中的智力对话(基于创造发明的分析)","authors":"A. A. Matyushkina, F.S. Keberlinskaya","doi":"10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-2-141-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the topical issues in the psychology of thinking is the study of conditions for successful solutions of creative tasks and problems. They include the intellectual dialogue. In this context, the authors conducted an empirical study of the intellectual dialogue in creative thinking as a condition for successful problem solving. The study was based on the theory of problem situations and structural level theory. The purpose of the research was to study the forms and functions of the intellectual dialogue at different stages of solving creative problems. Hypotheses: the functions and forms of the intellectual dialogue are related to the stage of solving a creative problem; specific features of creative problem solving determine those personal characteristics of the subjects being co-authors of the intellectual dialogue that are significant for achieving a solution. The study was carried out on a sample of inventors, various specialists in the scientific and technical field of Azerbaijan and Russia, patent holders (N = 17) aged 42 to 80 years old, (65% of males, 35% of females). The researchers used the original methodology (by F. S. Keberlinskaya, A. A. Matyushkina) that is aimed at assessing the forms and functions of the intellectual dialogue with the help of the thinking personalities’ ‘roles’ (Ch. M. Gadzhiyev) in relation to the process of creating their own inventions at its various stages. Diagnostics of personal characteristics was carried out with the help of the “Five-Factor Personality Model Questionnaire” (Robert R. McCrae, Paul T. Costa) adapted by A. B. Khromov, and the test by K. Thomas “Conflict Mode Instrument” (Kenneth W. Thomas, Ralph H. Kilmann) adapted by N. V. Grishina. The results show that the intellectual dialogue performs different functions correlated to the stage of problem solving in the process of creative problem solving that leads to a new invention at the level of discovery in the scientific and technical field and its later implementation in practice. At the stage of problem statement, the internal dialogue is significant for the author of the idea. This dialogue serves to understand the meaning of the problem as potentially solvable. At the stages of hypothesizing and developing final solutions, the role of an external dialogue is essential. This dialogue performs the functions of providing additional information and synthesizing it from different fields of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":34017,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta Novaia seriia Seriia Akmeologiia obrazovaniia Psikhologiia razvitiia","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intellectual dialogue in creative thinking (Based on the analysis of creating inventions)\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Matyushkina, F.S. Keberlinskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-2-141-153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the topical issues in the psychology of thinking is the study of conditions for successful solutions of creative tasks and problems. They include the intellectual dialogue. In this context, the authors conducted an empirical study of the intellectual dialogue in creative thinking as a condition for successful problem solving. The study was based on the theory of problem situations and structural level theory. The purpose of the research was to study the forms and functions of the intellectual dialogue at different stages of solving creative problems. Hypotheses: the functions and forms of the intellectual dialogue are related to the stage of solving a creative problem; specific features of creative problem solving determine those personal characteristics of the subjects being co-authors of the intellectual dialogue that are significant for achieving a solution. The study was carried out on a sample of inventors, various specialists in the scientific and technical field of Azerbaijan and Russia, patent holders (N = 17) aged 42 to 80 years old, (65% of males, 35% of females). The researchers used the original methodology (by F. S. Keberlinskaya, A. A. Matyushkina) that is aimed at assessing the forms and functions of the intellectual dialogue with the help of the thinking personalities’ ‘roles’ (Ch. M. Gadzhiyev) in relation to the process of creating their own inventions at its various stages. Diagnostics of personal characteristics was carried out with the help of the “Five-Factor Personality Model Questionnaire” (Robert R. McCrae, Paul T. Costa) adapted by A. B. Khromov, and the test by K. Thomas “Conflict Mode Instrument” (Kenneth W. Thomas, Ralph H. Kilmann) adapted by N. V. Grishina. The results show that the intellectual dialogue performs different functions correlated to the stage of problem solving in the process of creative problem solving that leads to a new invention at the level of discovery in the scientific and technical field and its later implementation in practice. At the stage of problem statement, the internal dialogue is significant for the author of the idea. This dialogue serves to understand the meaning of the problem as potentially solvable. At the stages of hypothesizing and developing final solutions, the role of an external dialogue is essential. This dialogue performs the functions of providing additional information and synthesizing it from different fields of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta Novaia seriia Seriia Akmeologiia obrazovaniia Psikhologiia razvitiia\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta Novaia seriia Seriia Akmeologiia obrazovaniia Psikhologiia razvitiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-2-141-153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta Novaia seriia Seriia Akmeologiia obrazovaniia Psikhologiia razvitiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-2-141-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
思维心理学中的一个热门问题是研究成功解决创造性任务和问题的条件。它们包括智力对话。在此背景下,作者对创造性思维中的智力对话作为成功解决问题的条件进行了实证研究。本研究基于问题情境理论和结构层次理论。本研究的目的是研究在解决创造性问题的不同阶段,智力对话的形式和功能。假设:智力对话的功能和形式与解决创造性问题的阶段有关;创造性解决问题的具体特征决定了作为智力对话的共同作者的那些个人特征,这些特征对实现解决方案具有重要意义。这项研究的样本包括发明者、阿塞拜疆和俄罗斯科学技术领域的各种专家、年龄在42至80岁之间的专利持有人(N = 17)(65%的男性,35%的女性)。研究人员使用了最初的方法(由F. S. Keberlinskaya, A. A. Matyushkina提出),目的是在思考人格的“角色”(Ch. M. Gadzhiyev)的帮助下,评估智力对话的形式和功能,这与他们在不同阶段创造自己发明的过程有关。人格特征诊断采用A. B. Khromov改编的“五因素人格模型问卷”(Robert R. McCrae, Paul T. Costa)和N. V. Grishina改编的K. Thomas“冲突模式量表”(Kenneth W. Thomas, Ralph H. Kilmann)进行。研究结果表明,在创造性解决问题的过程中,智力对话在问题解决阶段发挥了不同的作用,从而导致科学技术领域的发现层面的新发明及其后来在实践中的实施。在问题陈述阶段,内部对话对想法的作者来说是重要的。这种对话有助于理解问题的意义,认为问题是可以解决的。在假设和发展最终解决方案的阶段,外部对话的作用是必不可少的。这种对话的功能是提供额外的信息,并将来自不同知识领域的信息综合起来。
Intellectual dialogue in creative thinking (Based on the analysis of creating inventions)
One of the topical issues in the psychology of thinking is the study of conditions for successful solutions of creative tasks and problems. They include the intellectual dialogue. In this context, the authors conducted an empirical study of the intellectual dialogue in creative thinking as a condition for successful problem solving. The study was based on the theory of problem situations and structural level theory. The purpose of the research was to study the forms and functions of the intellectual dialogue at different stages of solving creative problems. Hypotheses: the functions and forms of the intellectual dialogue are related to the stage of solving a creative problem; specific features of creative problem solving determine those personal characteristics of the subjects being co-authors of the intellectual dialogue that are significant for achieving a solution. The study was carried out on a sample of inventors, various specialists in the scientific and technical field of Azerbaijan and Russia, patent holders (N = 17) aged 42 to 80 years old, (65% of males, 35% of females). The researchers used the original methodology (by F. S. Keberlinskaya, A. A. Matyushkina) that is aimed at assessing the forms and functions of the intellectual dialogue with the help of the thinking personalities’ ‘roles’ (Ch. M. Gadzhiyev) in relation to the process of creating their own inventions at its various stages. Diagnostics of personal characteristics was carried out with the help of the “Five-Factor Personality Model Questionnaire” (Robert R. McCrae, Paul T. Costa) adapted by A. B. Khromov, and the test by K. Thomas “Conflict Mode Instrument” (Kenneth W. Thomas, Ralph H. Kilmann) adapted by N. V. Grishina. The results show that the intellectual dialogue performs different functions correlated to the stage of problem solving in the process of creative problem solving that leads to a new invention at the level of discovery in the scientific and technical field and its later implementation in practice. At the stage of problem statement, the internal dialogue is significant for the author of the idea. This dialogue serves to understand the meaning of the problem as potentially solvable. At the stages of hypothesizing and developing final solutions, the role of an external dialogue is essential. This dialogue performs the functions of providing additional information and synthesizing it from different fields of knowledge.