{"title":"联合国的民主。赞成与反对","authors":"Raino Malnes","doi":"10.1080/08039410.1996.9666017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Raino Maines, ‘Democracy in the United Nations. For and Against’, Forum for Development Studies, 1996: 1, pp. 5–34. This article concludes with four observations: - there are divergent and weighty reasons for preferring democratic procedures to other modes of decision-making in the UN. - there are significant moral and pragmatic objections against the existing constitutional structure of the UN. - U Thant's statement that ‘it is hard to imagine another system by which the voting in the United Nations could be more equitably arranged’ (Childers and Urquhart, 1994, 125) is problematic. - it is far from clear that any prima facie cogent call for reform of the UN succeeds in establishing that reform is called for, all things considered.","PeriodicalId":85307,"journal":{"name":"Population bulletin of the United Nations","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democracy in the United Nations. For and Against\",\"authors\":\"Raino Malnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08039410.1996.9666017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Raino Maines, ‘Democracy in the United Nations. For and Against’, Forum for Development Studies, 1996: 1, pp. 5–34. This article concludes with four observations: - there are divergent and weighty reasons for preferring democratic procedures to other modes of decision-making in the UN. - there are significant moral and pragmatic objections against the existing constitutional structure of the UN. - U Thant's statement that ‘it is hard to imagine another system by which the voting in the United Nations could be more equitably arranged’ (Childers and Urquhart, 1994, 125) is problematic. - it is far from clear that any prima facie cogent call for reform of the UN succeeds in establishing that reform is called for, all things considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population bulletin of the United Nations\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population bulletin of the United Nations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.1996.9666017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population bulletin of the United Nations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.1996.9666017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary Raino Maines, ‘Democracy in the United Nations. For and Against’, Forum for Development Studies, 1996: 1, pp. 5–34. This article concludes with four observations: - there are divergent and weighty reasons for preferring democratic procedures to other modes of decision-making in the UN. - there are significant moral and pragmatic objections against the existing constitutional structure of the UN. - U Thant's statement that ‘it is hard to imagine another system by which the voting in the United Nations could be more equitably arranged’ (Childers and Urquhart, 1994, 125) is problematic. - it is far from clear that any prima facie cogent call for reform of the UN succeeds in establishing that reform is called for, all things considered.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
