意大利的解雇条例

Riccardo Del Punta
{"title":"意大利的解雇条例","authors":"Riccardo Del Punta","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2022.2109242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regulation of dismissal has always played a central role in Italian labour law, whose main developments have been marked by reforms concerning this subject. Hence, the introduction of major legislation protecting against unjustified dismissal, symbolised by Article 18 of the 1970 Workers’ Rights Statute, heralded the ‘golden age’ of labour law. Conversely, the growing flexibilisation, which has affected Italian (and European) labour law especially since the 2000s, has led to a liberalisation, albeit partial, of the legal regulations concerning dismissal. In both cases, the ensuing debates have been highly charged politically and been much publicised in the media. This has always made a non-ideological approach to the subject difficult. The result, as will be seen, is a decidedly complicated system, made up of successive layers, and which needs to be streamlined. However, the political consensus for a new reform has not yet been reached, partly because of the difficult external context (the 2007–2008 financial crisis and its repercussions; the pandemic), and the issue is not currently on the government’s agenda. It must also be said that the successive reforms (in 2012 and 2015) did not so much concern the concept of ‘unfair dismissal’ as such, but rather the remedies regime of unfair dismissal, ie the consequences arising from a judicial finding of the unlawfulness of a dismissal. This does not mean, however, that the concept of justification of dismissal is free from controversy, at least as far as economic dismissal is concerned. In contrast, there is greater consensus on the subject of disciplinary dismissal. Having said that, the article will be organised as follows. Section 2 will provide an overview of how dismissal legislation has evolved in Italy and the reforms that have taken place. Sections 3–6 will deal with the different types of dismissal provided for under Italian law, which are respectively disciplinary dismissal, economic dismissal,","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"39 1","pages":"188 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Regulation of Dismissal in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Del Punta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2022.2109242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The regulation of dismissal has always played a central role in Italian labour law, whose main developments have been marked by reforms concerning this subject. Hence, the introduction of major legislation protecting against unjustified dismissal, symbolised by Article 18 of the 1970 Workers’ Rights Statute, heralded the ‘golden age’ of labour law. Conversely, the growing flexibilisation, which has affected Italian (and European) labour law especially since the 2000s, has led to a liberalisation, albeit partial, of the legal regulations concerning dismissal. In both cases, the ensuing debates have been highly charged politically and been much publicised in the media. This has always made a non-ideological approach to the subject difficult. The result, as will be seen, is a decidedly complicated system, made up of successive layers, and which needs to be streamlined. However, the political consensus for a new reform has not yet been reached, partly because of the difficult external context (the 2007–2008 financial crisis and its repercussions; the pandemic), and the issue is not currently on the government’s agenda. It must also be said that the successive reforms (in 2012 and 2015) did not so much concern the concept of ‘unfair dismissal’ as such, but rather the remedies regime of unfair dismissal, ie the consequences arising from a judicial finding of the unlawfulness of a dismissal. This does not mean, however, that the concept of justification of dismissal is free from controversy, at least as far as economic dismissal is concerned. In contrast, there is greater consensus on the subject of disciplinary dismissal. Having said that, the article will be organised as follows. Section 2 will provide an overview of how dismissal legislation has evolved in Italy and the reforms that have taken place. Sections 3–6 will deal with the different types of dismissal provided for under Italian law, which are respectively disciplinary dismissal, economic dismissal,\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"188 - 207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2022.2109242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2022.2109242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解雇条例在意大利劳动法中一直起着中心作用,意大利劳动法的主要发展是关于这一问题的改革。因此,以1970年《工人权利条例》第18条为标志的防止无理解雇的主要立法的引入,预示着劳动法的“黄金时代”。相反,自2000年代以来,越来越多的灵活性影响了意大利(和欧洲)的劳动法,导致了有关解雇的法律法规的自由化,尽管是部分自由化。在这两种情况下,随后的辩论都高度政治化,并在媒体上大肆宣传。这总是使得用非意识形态的方法来研究这个问题变得困难。结果,正如我们将看到的,是一个非常复杂的系统,由连续的层组成,需要精简。然而,新改革的政治共识尚未达成,部分原因在于艰难的外部环境(2007-2008年金融危机及其影响;大流行),这个问题目前不在政府的议程上。还必须指出的是,连续的改革(2012年和2015年)并没有过多地关注“不公平解雇”的概念,而是关注不公平解雇的补救制度,即解雇的非法司法裁决所产生的后果。然而,这并不意味着解雇理由的概念没有争议,至少就经济解雇而言是如此。相比之下,在纪律解雇问题上有更大的共识。话虽如此,文章将组织如下。第2节将概述解雇立法在意大利是如何演变的,以及已经发生的改革。第3-6节将处理意大利法律规定的不同类型的解雇,分别是纪律解雇、经济解雇、
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Regulation of Dismissal in Italy
The regulation of dismissal has always played a central role in Italian labour law, whose main developments have been marked by reforms concerning this subject. Hence, the introduction of major legislation protecting against unjustified dismissal, symbolised by Article 18 of the 1970 Workers’ Rights Statute, heralded the ‘golden age’ of labour law. Conversely, the growing flexibilisation, which has affected Italian (and European) labour law especially since the 2000s, has led to a liberalisation, albeit partial, of the legal regulations concerning dismissal. In both cases, the ensuing debates have been highly charged politically and been much publicised in the media. This has always made a non-ideological approach to the subject difficult. The result, as will be seen, is a decidedly complicated system, made up of successive layers, and which needs to be streamlined. However, the political consensus for a new reform has not yet been reached, partly because of the difficult external context (the 2007–2008 financial crisis and its repercussions; the pandemic), and the issue is not currently on the government’s agenda. It must also be said that the successive reforms (in 2012 and 2015) did not so much concern the concept of ‘unfair dismissal’ as such, but rather the remedies regime of unfair dismissal, ie the consequences arising from a judicial finding of the unlawfulness of a dismissal. This does not mean, however, that the concept of justification of dismissal is free from controversy, at least as far as economic dismissal is concerned. In contrast, there is greater consensus on the subject of disciplinary dismissal. Having said that, the article will be organised as follows. Section 2 will provide an overview of how dismissal legislation has evolved in Italy and the reforms that have taken place. Sections 3–6 will deal with the different types of dismissal provided for under Italian law, which are respectively disciplinary dismissal, economic dismissal,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1