一个跨专业学习项目的定性评估

Annette M. Jinks BA MA PhD RN NDN Cert Ed, Helen Armitage MSc PGDEd RGN RSCN, Richard Pitt BA[Hons] MPhil FETCert DipN[Lond] Cert Ed RGN RMN
{"title":"一个跨专业学习项目的定性评估","authors":"Annette M. Jinks BA MA PhD RN NDN Cert Ed,&nbsp;Helen Armitage MSc PGDEd RGN RSCN,&nbsp;Richard Pitt BA[Hons] MPhil FETCert DipN[Lond] Cert Ed RGN RMN","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00219.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study described in this paper focuses on an interprofessional learning (IPL) in practice project. The project entailed appointing a number of IPL in practice facilitators whose task it was to assist clinical teams to develop opportunities for students to engage in IPL. The evaluation described focuses on one of the initial project sites, a rehabilitation ward in a community hospital. The evaluation aimed to establish a range of differing perspectives on the project including service users, steering group members, the clinical team and participating students. Narrative data were collected using focus groups, one-to-one interviews, documentary analysis and postal and electronic questionnaires. Triangulation approaches were used to analyse data and the findings were largely positive. Lessons learnt included such things as practical difficulties of introducing IPL in practice, effective use of lay persons in professional education and the difficulties of engaging medical staff in such initiatives. Limitations of the study include difficulties in getting students to participate in either focus group discussions or one-to-one interviews; therefore, alternative data sources had to be deployed, such as e-mail contact. Conclusions are that even when an experienced IPL facilitator is in post there is a need to foster practice staffs’ commitment to IPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00219.x","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project\",\"authors\":\"Annette M. Jinks BA MA PhD RN NDN Cert Ed,&nbsp;Helen Armitage MSc PGDEd RGN RSCN,&nbsp;Richard Pitt BA[Hons] MPhil FETCert DipN[Lond] Cert Ed RGN RMN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00219.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study described in this paper focuses on an interprofessional learning (IPL) in practice project. The project entailed appointing a number of IPL in practice facilitators whose task it was to assist clinical teams to develop opportunities for students to engage in IPL. The evaluation described focuses on one of the initial project sites, a rehabilitation ward in a community hospital. The evaluation aimed to establish a range of differing perspectives on the project including service users, steering group members, the clinical team and participating students. Narrative data were collected using focus groups, one-to-one interviews, documentary analysis and postal and electronic questionnaires. Triangulation approaches were used to analyse data and the findings were largely positive. Lessons learnt included such things as practical difficulties of introducing IPL in practice, effective use of lay persons in professional education and the difficulties of engaging medical staff in such initiatives. Limitations of the study include difficulties in getting students to participate in either focus group discussions or one-to-one interviews; therefore, alternative data sources had to be deployed, such as e-mail contact. Conclusions are that even when an experienced IPL facilitator is in post there is a need to foster practice staffs’ commitment to IPL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning in Health and Social Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00219.x\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning in Health and Social Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00219.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00219.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文的研究重点是一个跨专业学习(IPL)的实践项目。该项目需要任命一些IPL实践辅导员,他们的任务是协助临床团队为学生提供参与IPL的机会。所描述的评估侧重于最初项目地点之一,即一家社区医院的康复病房。评估的目的是建立对项目的一系列不同观点,包括服务使用者、指导小组成员、临床团队和参与的学生。采用焦点小组、一对一访谈、文献分析、邮寄和电子问卷等方式收集叙事数据。三角测量法被用于分析数据,结果基本上是积极的。所吸取的经验教训包括在实践中引入IPL的实际困难、在专业教育中有效利用非专业人员以及让医务人员参与这类倡议的困难。本研究的局限性包括难以让学生参与焦点小组讨论或一对一访谈;因此,必须部署替代数据源,例如电子邮件联系人。结论是,即使有经验丰富的IPL促进者在岗位上,也需要促进实践人员对IPL的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project

The study described in this paper focuses on an interprofessional learning (IPL) in practice project. The project entailed appointing a number of IPL in practice facilitators whose task it was to assist clinical teams to develop opportunities for students to engage in IPL. The evaluation described focuses on one of the initial project sites, a rehabilitation ward in a community hospital. The evaluation aimed to establish a range of differing perspectives on the project including service users, steering group members, the clinical team and participating students. Narrative data were collected using focus groups, one-to-one interviews, documentary analysis and postal and electronic questionnaires. Triangulation approaches were used to analyse data and the findings were largely positive. Lessons learnt included such things as practical difficulties of introducing IPL in practice, effective use of lay persons in professional education and the difficulties of engaging medical staff in such initiatives. Limitations of the study include difficulties in getting students to participate in either focus group discussions or one-to-one interviews; therefore, alternative data sources had to be deployed, such as e-mail contact. Conclusions are that even when an experienced IPL facilitator is in post there is a need to foster practice staffs’ commitment to IPL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiential placements and scaffolding for reflection A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project Becoming a lecturer in nurse education: the work-place learning of clinical experts as newcomers Lost in translation: barriers to learning in health professional clinical education Undergraduate socialization in medical education: ideals of professional physicians’ practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1