泰国反逃税立法介绍:制度理论视角

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Forum Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/01559982.2022.2092813
Vorakanlaya Natpraypant, Norin Arshed, D. Power
{"title":"泰国反逃税立法介绍:制度理论视角","authors":"Vorakanlaya Natpraypant, Norin Arshed, D. Power","doi":"10.1080/01559982.2022.2092813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 26 April 2016, Thailand introduced new tax evasion legislation which was enacted by Parliament in April 2017. The Act amended previous anti-money laundering legislation, transferred prosecution of serious tax evasion cases from the Revenue Department to an anti-money laundering unit and permitted the seizure of an accused ’ s assets once criminal proceedings had been initiated. Drawing on institutional theory, our study examines why this legislation was introduced. It focusses on the formal institutions and legitimacy. Speci fi cally, it reports on 35 interviews with a range of stakeholders to ascertain their views about the reasons behind this legal change. The results suggest that external and internal legitimacy concerns acted as catalysts for the change. These results have practical implications for those investigating the issue of tax evasion and policy implications for those examining whether legislation will impact the incidence of tax evasion within a country.","PeriodicalId":47566,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Forum","volume":"11 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The introduction of anti-tax evasion legislation in Thailand: an institutional theoretical perspective\",\"authors\":\"Vorakanlaya Natpraypant, Norin Arshed, D. Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01559982.2022.2092813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 26 April 2016, Thailand introduced new tax evasion legislation which was enacted by Parliament in April 2017. The Act amended previous anti-money laundering legislation, transferred prosecution of serious tax evasion cases from the Revenue Department to an anti-money laundering unit and permitted the seizure of an accused ’ s assets once criminal proceedings had been initiated. Drawing on institutional theory, our study examines why this legislation was introduced. It focusses on the formal institutions and legitimacy. Speci fi cally, it reports on 35 interviews with a range of stakeholders to ascertain their views about the reasons behind this legal change. The results suggest that external and internal legitimacy concerns acted as catalysts for the change. These results have practical implications for those investigating the issue of tax evasion and policy implications for those examining whether legislation will impact the incidence of tax evasion within a country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"volume\":\"11 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2022.2092813\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Forum","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2022.2092813","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2016年4月26日,泰国引入了新的逃税立法,该立法于2017年4月由议会颁布。该法案修订了以前的反洗钱立法,将对严重逃税案件的起诉从税务局转移到反洗钱部门,并允许在刑事诉讼程序启动后没收被告的资产。利用制度理论,我们的研究探讨了引入这一立法的原因。它侧重于正式制度和合法性。具体来说,它报告了对一系列利益相关者的35次采访,以确定他们对这一法律变化背后原因的看法。结果表明,外部和内部的合法性问题是这一变化的催化剂。这些结果对那些调查逃税问题的人具有实际意义,对那些审查立法是否会影响一个国家内逃税发生率的人具有政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The introduction of anti-tax evasion legislation in Thailand: an institutional theoretical perspective
On 26 April 2016, Thailand introduced new tax evasion legislation which was enacted by Parliament in April 2017. The Act amended previous anti-money laundering legislation, transferred prosecution of serious tax evasion cases from the Revenue Department to an anti-money laundering unit and permitted the seizure of an accused ’ s assets once criminal proceedings had been initiated. Drawing on institutional theory, our study examines why this legislation was introduced. It focusses on the formal institutions and legitimacy. Speci fi cally, it reports on 35 interviews with a range of stakeholders to ascertain their views about the reasons behind this legal change. The results suggest that external and internal legitimacy concerns acted as catalysts for the change. These results have practical implications for those investigating the issue of tax evasion and policy implications for those examining whether legislation will impact the incidence of tax evasion within a country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Forum
Accounting Forum BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Accounting Forum publishes authoritative yet accessible articles which advance our knowledge of theory and practice in all areas of accounting, business finance and related subjects. The journal both promotes greater understanding of the role of business in the global environment, and provides a forum for the intellectual exchange of academic research in business fields, particularly in the accounting profession. Covering a range of topical issues in accounting, business finance and related fields, Accounting Forum''s main areas of interest are: accounting theory; auditing; financial accounting; finance and accounting education; management accounting; small business; social and environmental accounting; and taxation. Of equal interest to practitioners, academics, and students, each issue of the journal includes peer-reviewed articles, notes and comments section.
期刊最新文献
Carbon disclosure, greenhouse gas emissions and market value of FTSE 350 firms – evidence from voluntary carbon disclosers versus non-disclosers The EU Taxonomy, sustainability reporting and financial institutions: understanding the elements driving regulatory uncertainty Environmental and social accountability in emerging economies: strategic pressures from and responses to vulnerable local communities What roles does accounting play in the fight against corruption? Insights from a systematic literature review An analysis of the effect of employee tenure on WACC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1