一种新的方法改变了人们对建筑围护结构固体部分的期望:测试二氧化碳扩散和建筑材料的保留性能

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.4305/metu.jfa.2023.1.6
Başak YÜNCÜ KARANFİL, A. Tavukçuoğlu
{"title":"一种新的方法改变了人们对建筑围护结构固体部分的期望:测试二氧化碳扩散和建筑材料的保留性能","authors":"Başak YÜNCÜ KARANFİL, A. Tavukçuoğlu","doi":"10.4305/metu.jfa.2023.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary building technology focuses on fully airtight building envelopes supported with mechanical or hybrid ventilation systems for energy-efficient buildings and healthier indoors. In fact, during COVID-19 pandemic and associated lock-downs, people realized how valuable fresh air is in built environments. Experts and governments promoted natural ventilation to meet higher air change rates. If mechanical ventilation is the only option, it is recommended to stop recirculation and feed the indoor air with 100% outdoor air (ASHREA, 2020; REHVA, 2021). These recommendations are quite challenging for a sustainable construction sector aiming at energy efficiency. This challenge presents an opportunity to think out of the box. In other words, this situation awakens curiosity to other undiscovered horizons beyond the common approach which encourages fully airtight built environments and advanced mechanical ventilation solutions. Here, this study asks a striking question: “What if the key to healthier indoor air is the breathable building envelopes?” This question may be considered as a paradigm shift for the building science community obsessed with airtightness. In fact, the concept of breathable walls is not new, but this hitherto underestimated approach is worth reconsidering.","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A NEW APPROACH CHANGING EXPECTATIONS FROM SOLID PARTS OF BUILDING ENVELOPES: TESTING THE CARBON DIOXIDE DIFFUSION AND RETAINING PERFORMANCES OF BUILDING MATERIALS\",\"authors\":\"Başak YÜNCÜ KARANFİL, A. Tavukçuoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.4305/metu.jfa.2023.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary building technology focuses on fully airtight building envelopes supported with mechanical or hybrid ventilation systems for energy-efficient buildings and healthier indoors. In fact, during COVID-19 pandemic and associated lock-downs, people realized how valuable fresh air is in built environments. Experts and governments promoted natural ventilation to meet higher air change rates. If mechanical ventilation is the only option, it is recommended to stop recirculation and feed the indoor air with 100% outdoor air (ASHREA, 2020; REHVA, 2021). These recommendations are quite challenging for a sustainable construction sector aiming at energy efficiency. This challenge presents an opportunity to think out of the box. In other words, this situation awakens curiosity to other undiscovered horizons beyond the common approach which encourages fully airtight built environments and advanced mechanical ventilation solutions. Here, this study asks a striking question: “What if the key to healthier indoor air is the breathable building envelopes?” This question may be considered as a paradigm shift for the building science community obsessed with airtightness. In fact, the concept of breathable walls is not new, but this hitherto underestimated approach is worth reconsidering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2023.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2023.1.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代建筑技术侧重于完全密封的建筑围护结构,支持机械或混合通风系统,以实现节能建筑和更健康的室内环境。事实上,在COVID-19大流行和相关的封锁期间,人们意识到建筑环境中的新鲜空气是多么宝贵。专家和政府提倡自然通风,以满足更高的空气变化率。如果机械通风是唯一的选择,建议停止再循环,用100%的室外空气喂养室内空气(ASHREA, 2020;REHVA, 2021)。这些建议对于以能源效率为目标的可持续建筑行业来说是相当具有挑战性的。这个挑战提供了一个跳出固有思维的机会。换句话说,这种情况唤醒了人们对其他未被发现的视野的好奇心,而不是鼓励完全密封的建筑环境和先进的机械通风解决方案。在这里,这项研究提出了一个引人注目的问题:“如果更健康的室内空气的关键是可呼吸的建筑外壳呢?”这个问题可能被认为是痴迷于密封性的建筑科学界的范式转变。事实上,透气墙的概念并不新鲜,但这种迄今为止被低估的方法值得重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A NEW APPROACH CHANGING EXPECTATIONS FROM SOLID PARTS OF BUILDING ENVELOPES: TESTING THE CARBON DIOXIDE DIFFUSION AND RETAINING PERFORMANCES OF BUILDING MATERIALS
Contemporary building technology focuses on fully airtight building envelopes supported with mechanical or hybrid ventilation systems for energy-efficient buildings and healthier indoors. In fact, during COVID-19 pandemic and associated lock-downs, people realized how valuable fresh air is in built environments. Experts and governments promoted natural ventilation to meet higher air change rates. If mechanical ventilation is the only option, it is recommended to stop recirculation and feed the indoor air with 100% outdoor air (ASHREA, 2020; REHVA, 2021). These recommendations are quite challenging for a sustainable construction sector aiming at energy efficiency. This challenge presents an opportunity to think out of the box. In other words, this situation awakens curiosity to other undiscovered horizons beyond the common approach which encourages fully airtight built environments and advanced mechanical ventilation solutions. Here, this study asks a striking question: “What if the key to healthier indoor air is the breathable building envelopes?” This question may be considered as a paradigm shift for the building science community obsessed with airtightness. In fact, the concept of breathable walls is not new, but this hitherto underestimated approach is worth reconsidering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
TRACING THE EMERGENCE OF A PERIPHERAL WATERFRONT NEIGHBORHOOD IN ISTAVROZBEYLERBEYI ON THE BOSPHORUS SHORES (1760-1805) Un-building: a utopia of receding construction Striving for a new monumentality: the non-classical influence on Gunnar Asplund’s architecture ‘The germ of future extension and perpetuity’: capitalism and the Peabody Trust RESTRUCTURING AND NEW SPATIAL TENDENCIES IN ANKARA FURNITURE SECTOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1