非殖民化城市空间:1986-2015年津巴布韦鲁瓦镇城市规划的历史观察

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY New Contree Pub Date : 2018-12-30 DOI:10.4102/nc.v81i0.69
T. Muzorewa, Vongai Z. Nyawo, Mark Nyandoro
{"title":"非殖民化城市空间:1986-2015年津巴布韦鲁瓦镇城市规划的历史观察","authors":"T. Muzorewa, Vongai Z. Nyawo, Mark Nyandoro","doi":"10.4102/nc.v81i0.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article calls for a shift of attention from the colonial urban planning methods to a focus on the post-colonial planning methods being adopted in new towns such as Ruwa. The core of the studies on urban planning in Zimbabwe has been centred on colonial established urban centres tending to promote the reproduction of spatial disparities in urban areas. This article argues that the only way to decolonise urban space in Zimbabwe is through establishing new towns which are not linked to the colonial planning system. All of the major towns in the country except Ruwa were established during the colonial era based on a planning system which segregated the African population. The colonial planning methods produced uneven development between areas occupied by Europeans and Africans. Although urban policies were deracialised during the post-colonial era, the physical nature of the built environment remained the same. While it was possible to change colonial urban policy, it was impossible to change, fundamentally, the spatial physical structures such as buildings, roads, water reticulation and sewerage systems. The spatial form of today’s Zimbabwean urban areas is an embodiment of colonial planning as this change entailed enormous financial costs. Ruwa town, therefore, demonstrates how modern urban development in the southern African country has been achieved on the basis of a totally different experience from the colonial established towns. Using insights from the town, the article illustrates the importance of studying post-colonial planning methods as a way of promoting the decolonisation of urban space.","PeriodicalId":52000,"journal":{"name":"New Contree","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonising urban space: Observations from history in urban planning in Ruwa town, Zimbabwe, 1986-2015\",\"authors\":\"T. Muzorewa, Vongai Z. Nyawo, Mark Nyandoro\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/nc.v81i0.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article calls for a shift of attention from the colonial urban planning methods to a focus on the post-colonial planning methods being adopted in new towns such as Ruwa. The core of the studies on urban planning in Zimbabwe has been centred on colonial established urban centres tending to promote the reproduction of spatial disparities in urban areas. This article argues that the only way to decolonise urban space in Zimbabwe is through establishing new towns which are not linked to the colonial planning system. All of the major towns in the country except Ruwa were established during the colonial era based on a planning system which segregated the African population. The colonial planning methods produced uneven development between areas occupied by Europeans and Africans. Although urban policies were deracialised during the post-colonial era, the physical nature of the built environment remained the same. While it was possible to change colonial urban policy, it was impossible to change, fundamentally, the spatial physical structures such as buildings, roads, water reticulation and sewerage systems. The spatial form of today’s Zimbabwean urban areas is an embodiment of colonial planning as this change entailed enormous financial costs. Ruwa town, therefore, demonstrates how modern urban development in the southern African country has been achieved on the basis of a totally different experience from the colonial established towns. Using insights from the town, the article illustrates the importance of studying post-colonial planning methods as a way of promoting the decolonisation of urban space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Contree\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Contree\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v81i0.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Contree","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v81i0.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文呼吁将人们的注意力从殖民时期的城市规划方法转移到像鲁瓦这样的新城镇所采用的后殖民规划方法上。津巴布韦城市规划研究的核心集中在殖民地建立的城市中心,这些城市中心倾向于促进城市地区空间差异的再现。本文认为,津巴布韦城市空间非殖民化的唯一途径是建立与殖民规划系统无关的新城镇。除了鲁瓦以外,该国所有主要城镇都是在殖民时期根据隔离非洲人口的规划制度建立的。殖民主义的规划方法造成了欧洲人与非洲人占领地区之间的不平衡发展。在后殖民时代,虽然城市政策被去种族化,但建筑环境的物理性质仍然保持不变。虽然有可能改变殖民城市政策,但不可能从根本上改变空间物理结构,如建筑物、道路、水网和污水处理系统。今天津巴布韦城市地区的空间形式是殖民规划的体现,因为这种变化需要巨大的财政成本。因此,鲁瓦镇表明,这个南部非洲国家的现代城市发展是如何在与殖民地建立的城镇完全不同的经验基础上实现的。本文通过对城市的洞察,说明了研究后殖民规划方法作为促进城市空间非殖民化的一种方式的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decolonising urban space: Observations from history in urban planning in Ruwa town, Zimbabwe, 1986-2015
This article calls for a shift of attention from the colonial urban planning methods to a focus on the post-colonial planning methods being adopted in new towns such as Ruwa. The core of the studies on urban planning in Zimbabwe has been centred on colonial established urban centres tending to promote the reproduction of spatial disparities in urban areas. This article argues that the only way to decolonise urban space in Zimbabwe is through establishing new towns which are not linked to the colonial planning system. All of the major towns in the country except Ruwa were established during the colonial era based on a planning system which segregated the African population. The colonial planning methods produced uneven development between areas occupied by Europeans and Africans. Although urban policies were deracialised during the post-colonial era, the physical nature of the built environment remained the same. While it was possible to change colonial urban policy, it was impossible to change, fundamentally, the spatial physical structures such as buildings, roads, water reticulation and sewerage systems. The spatial form of today’s Zimbabwean urban areas is an embodiment of colonial planning as this change entailed enormous financial costs. Ruwa town, therefore, demonstrates how modern urban development in the southern African country has been achieved on the basis of a totally different experience from the colonial established towns. Using insights from the town, the article illustrates the importance of studying post-colonial planning methods as a way of promoting the decolonisation of urban space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Contree
New Contree HISTORY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of CASSAS in the liberation struggle of the southern African region, 1976 to the early 1980s The waning fortunes of traditional leadership in South Africa: From pre-colonial to apartheid periods The place of the Bulhoek massacre in South African history From the Editor-in-Chief’s Desk From the Editor-in-Chief’s Desk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1