反对认识:认知暴力的修辞结构

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Southern Communication Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.1080/1041794X.2022.2101683
C. Graves, Leland G. Spencer
{"title":"反对认识:认知暴力的修辞结构","authors":"C. Graves, Leland G. Spencer","doi":"10.1080/1041794X.2022.2101683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Philosophers have theorized epistemic violence as a form of harm committed against people primarily in their capacities as knowers. In this essay, we apply a modal materialist perspective to understand epistemic violence as a rhetorical process that is made possible through binary, hierarchy, and perfecting tendencies of language. Taken together, such tendencies form a script in which interlocutors are divided into “rational” actors, who are legitimated to define knowledge in particular contexts, pitted against “irrational” actors, who are made enemies of knowledge and excluded from knowledge-creating processes. We then apply this script in a reading of two narratives about transphobia by philosopher Veronica Ivy that discuss forms of epistemic violence. We show how such violence is underwritten by our script at the rhetorical level, concluding with three counter-rhetorical strategies to epistemic violence: fomenting empathy, dislodging supremacist power structures, and practicing radical listening.","PeriodicalId":46274,"journal":{"name":"Southern Communication Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against Knowing: The Rhetorical Structure of Epistemic Violence\",\"authors\":\"C. Graves, Leland G. Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1041794X.2022.2101683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Philosophers have theorized epistemic violence as a form of harm committed against people primarily in their capacities as knowers. In this essay, we apply a modal materialist perspective to understand epistemic violence as a rhetorical process that is made possible through binary, hierarchy, and perfecting tendencies of language. Taken together, such tendencies form a script in which interlocutors are divided into “rational” actors, who are legitimated to define knowledge in particular contexts, pitted against “irrational” actors, who are made enemies of knowledge and excluded from knowledge-creating processes. We then apply this script in a reading of two narratives about transphobia by philosopher Veronica Ivy that discuss forms of epistemic violence. We show how such violence is underwritten by our script at the rhetorical level, concluding with three counter-rhetorical strategies to epistemic violence: fomenting empathy, dislodging supremacist power structures, and practicing radical listening.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Communication Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2022.2101683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2022.2101683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

哲学家们已经将认知暴力理论化为一种主要以知识者的身份对人们造成伤害的形式。在本文中,我们运用模态唯物主义的观点来理解认知暴力作为一种修辞过程,这种修辞过程是通过语言的二元性、层次性和完善性倾向而实现的。综上所述,这些趋势形成了一个剧本,在这个剧本中,对话者被分为“理性”行为者,他们有资格在特定的背景下定义知识,与“非理性”行为者对立,后者是知识的敌人,被排除在知识创造过程之外。然后,我们将这个脚本应用于哲学家维罗妮卡·艾维(Veronica Ivy)关于跨性别恐惧症的两篇叙述的阅读中,这两篇叙述讨论了认知暴力的形式。我们展示了这种暴力是如何在修辞层面上被我们的剧本所支持的,并总结了三种针对认知暴力的反修辞策略:煽动同理心,推翻至上主义的权力结构,以及练习激进的倾听。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Against Knowing: The Rhetorical Structure of Epistemic Violence
ABSTRACT Philosophers have theorized epistemic violence as a form of harm committed against people primarily in their capacities as knowers. In this essay, we apply a modal materialist perspective to understand epistemic violence as a rhetorical process that is made possible through binary, hierarchy, and perfecting tendencies of language. Taken together, such tendencies form a script in which interlocutors are divided into “rational” actors, who are legitimated to define knowledge in particular contexts, pitted against “irrational” actors, who are made enemies of knowledge and excluded from knowledge-creating processes. We then apply this script in a reading of two narratives about transphobia by philosopher Veronica Ivy that discuss forms of epistemic violence. We show how such violence is underwritten by our script at the rhetorical level, concluding with three counter-rhetorical strategies to epistemic violence: fomenting empathy, dislodging supremacist power structures, and practicing radical listening.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Dominant Factors Driving Civic Engagement on of the Bandung City Government’s Social Media Instructor Communicative Behaviors as Cultivators of Students’ Task Value Managing Jealousy within Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships: A Critical Discursive Psychological Approach Explicating the Pathways Among Memorable Message Themes About Religion and Spirituality, Positive Role Models for Aging, and Successful Aging Understanding Media Effects Through Media Technological Attributes: Young People’s Second Screening Use and Political Efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1