船舶甲板和其他脚下表面的防滑性能与表面粗糙度的关系

Raoul Grönqvist, Jouko Roine, Eero Korhonen, Ahti Rahikainen
{"title":"船舶甲板和其他脚下表面的防滑性能与表面粗糙度的关系","authors":"Raoul Grönqvist,&nbsp;Jouko Roine,&nbsp;Eero Korhonen,&nbsp;Ahti Rahikainen","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90035-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The slip resistance of thirteen deck and other underfoot surfaces commonly used in ships was assessed by measuring the kinetic coefficient of friction between these floorings, contaminated with glycerol, and three types of safety footwear. The floorings were used on decks, stairs and passages as well as in engine-rooms, kitchens and other indoor and outdoor facilities. The kinetic coefficient of friction (μ<sub>k1</sub>) was measured with a prototype apparatus, which simulates the movements of a human foot and the forces applied to the underfoot surface during a sudden slip on the heel.</p><p>The measured average μ<sub>k1</sub>s of the assessed floorings varied from 0.05 to 0.64. Four floorings were classified as very slip-resistant and one as slip-resistant. All the others were classified as slippery. The rough floorings were more slip-resistant than the smooth ones. The correlation between the arithmetical average roughness (<em>R</em><sub>a</sub>) and the average μ<sub>k1</sub> of the assessed surfaces was very significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). When selecting deck and other underfoot surfaces and developing new flooring products, more attention should be paid to their surface texture. From the slip resistance point of view the adequate <em>R</em><sub>a</sub> value was 7–9 μm, so smoother surfaces should be avoided. A raised-pattern on floorings also improved the slip resistance compared to corresponding unpatterned floorings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 291-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90035-T","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships\",\"authors\":\"Raoul Grönqvist,&nbsp;Jouko Roine,&nbsp;Eero Korhonen,&nbsp;Ahti Rahikainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90035-T\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The slip resistance of thirteen deck and other underfoot surfaces commonly used in ships was assessed by measuring the kinetic coefficient of friction between these floorings, contaminated with glycerol, and three types of safety footwear. The floorings were used on decks, stairs and passages as well as in engine-rooms, kitchens and other indoor and outdoor facilities. The kinetic coefficient of friction (μ<sub>k1</sub>) was measured with a prototype apparatus, which simulates the movements of a human foot and the forces applied to the underfoot surface during a sudden slip on the heel.</p><p>The measured average μ<sub>k1</sub>s of the assessed floorings varied from 0.05 to 0.64. Four floorings were classified as very slip-resistant and one as slip-resistant. All the others were classified as slippery. The rough floorings were more slip-resistant than the smooth ones. The correlation between the arithmetical average roughness (<em>R</em><sub>a</sub>) and the average μ<sub>k1</sub> of the assessed surfaces was very significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). When selecting deck and other underfoot surfaces and developing new flooring products, more attention should be paid to their surface texture. From the slip resistance point of view the adequate <em>R</em><sub>a</sub> value was 7–9 μm, so smoother surfaces should be avoided. A raised-pattern on floorings also improved the slip resistance compared to corresponding unpatterned floorings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 291-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90035-T\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090035T\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090035T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

通过测量被甘油污染的地板和三种类型的安全鞋之间的摩擦动力学系数,评估了船舶常用的13种甲板和其他脚底表面的防滑性。这些地板用于甲板、楼梯和通道,以及机舱、厨房和其他室内外设施。利用模拟人足突滑时足部运动和脚底受力的原型装置,测量了足部的动力学摩擦系数μk1。各评价层的实测平均μk1s范围为0.05 ~ 0.64。四层地板被列为非常防滑,一层被列为防滑。其他的都被归为滑头。粗糙的地板比光滑的地板更防滑。评定表面的算术平均粗糙度(Ra)与平均μk1之间的相关性非常显著(p <0.001)。在选择甲板等脚底表面和开发新的地板产品时,更应注意其表面纹理。从抗滑性角度看,Ra值为7 ~ 9 μm为宜,应避免光滑表面。与相应的无花纹地板相比,地板上的凸起图案也提高了防滑性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships

The slip resistance of thirteen deck and other underfoot surfaces commonly used in ships was assessed by measuring the kinetic coefficient of friction between these floorings, contaminated with glycerol, and three types of safety footwear. The floorings were used on decks, stairs and passages as well as in engine-rooms, kitchens and other indoor and outdoor facilities. The kinetic coefficient of friction (μk1) was measured with a prototype apparatus, which simulates the movements of a human foot and the forces applied to the underfoot surface during a sudden slip on the heel.

The measured average μk1s of the assessed floorings varied from 0.05 to 0.64. Four floorings were classified as very slip-resistant and one as slip-resistant. All the others were classified as slippery. The rough floorings were more slip-resistant than the smooth ones. The correlation between the arithmetical average roughness (Ra) and the average μk1 of the assessed surfaces was very significant (p < 0.001). When selecting deck and other underfoot surfaces and developing new flooring products, more attention should be paid to their surface texture. From the slip resistance point of view the adequate Ra value was 7–9 μm, so smoother surfaces should be avoided. A raised-pattern on floorings also improved the slip resistance compared to corresponding unpatterned floorings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The physiology of work Physical ergonomics job design: an accident prevention approach to control upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in manufacturing industry An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1